The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Demonstration of Fidelity Improvement Using Dynamical Decoupling with Superconducting Qubits
Open accessAbstract
Quantum computers must be able to function in the presence of decoherence. The simplest strategy for decoherence reduction is dynamical decoupling (DD), which requires no encoding overhead and works by converting quantum gates into decoupling pulses. Here, using the IBM and Rigetti platforms, we demonstrate that the DD method is suitable for implementation in today's relatively noisy and small-scale cloud-based quantum computers. Using DD, we achieve substantial fidelity gains relative to unprotected, free evolution of individual superconducting transmon qubits. To a lesser degree, DD is also capable of protecting entangled two-qubit states. We show that dephasing and spontaneous emission errors are dominant in these systems, and that different DD sequences are capable of mitigating both effects. Unlike previous work demonstrating the use of quantum error correcting codes on the same platforms, we make no use of postselection and hence report unconditional fidelity improvements against natural decoherence.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Recently, DD experiments were performed on the 16-qubit IBMQX5, 5-qubit IBMQX4, and the 19-qubit Rigetti Acorn chips (Pokharel et al. , 2018), where the gain in substantial gate fidelity relative to unprotected, free evolution of individual transmon qubits was demonstrated.”
From Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms (2022) · cites this paper as Pokharel et al., 2018
Citations
Cites
Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond
Preskill, J. (2018) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79 · Cited by 8,830
Quantum computation with quantum dots
Loss, D., & DiVincenzo, D. P. (1998) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.57.120 · Cited by 6,840
Scully, M. O., & Zubairy, M. S. (1997) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511813993 · Cited by 6,589
A silicon-based nuclear spin quantum computer
Kane, B. E. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/30156 · Cited by 3,779
Quantum Computations with Cold Trapped Ions
Cirac, J. I., & Zoller, P. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.74.4091 · Cited by 3,733
Coherent control of macroscopic quantum states in a single-Cooper-pair box
Nakamura, Y., Pashkin, Y. A., & Tsai, J. S. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/19718 · Cited by 2,386
Dynamical Decoupling of Open Quantum Systems
Viola, L., Knill, E., & Lloyd, S. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.82.2417 · Cited by 1,808
The ‘transition probability’ in the state space of a—algebra
Uhlmann, A. (1976) · Reports on Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1016/0034-4877(76)90060-4 · Cited by 1,649
Dynamical suppression of decoherence in two-state quantum systems
Viola, L., & Lloyd, S. (1998) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.58.2733 · Cited by 1,617
Coherent control of macroscopic quantum states in a single-Cooper-pair box
Nakamura, Y., Pashkin, Y. A., & Tsai, J. S. (1999) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 1,509
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms
Bharti, K., Cervera-Lierta, A., Kyaw, T. H., Haug, T., Alperin-Lea, S., Anand, A., Degroote, M., Heimonen, H., Kottmann, J. S., Menke, T., et al. (2022) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.94.015004 · Cited by 2,231
A quantum engineer's guide to superconducting qubits
Krantz, P., Kjærgaard, M., Yan, F., Orlando, T. P., Gustavsson, S., & Oliver, W. D. (2019) · Applied Physics Reviews · doi:10.1063/1.5089550 · Cited by 2,321
Benchmarking an 11-qubit quantum computer
Wright, K., Beck, K. M., Debnath, S., Amini, J., Nam, Y., Grzesiak, N., Chen, J.-S., Pisenti, N. C., Chmielewski, M., Collins, C., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13534-2 · Cited by 575
t|ket⟩: a retargetable compiler for NISQ devices
Sivarajah, S., Dilkes, S., Cowtan, A., Simmons, W., Edgington, A., & Duncan, R. (2021) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ab8e92 · Cited by 475
Tannu, S. S., & Qureshi, M. K. (2019) · Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems · doi:10.1145/3297858.3304007 · Cited by 306
Digital zero noise extrapolation for quantum error mitigation
Giurgica-Tiron, T., Hindy, Y., LaRose, R., Mari, A., & Zeng, W. J. (2020) · 2020 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) · doi:10.1109/qce49297.2020.00045 · Cited by 241
Dynamical decoupling for superconducting qubits: A performance survey
Ezzell, N., Pokharel, B., Tewala, L., Quiroz, G., & Lidar, D. A. (2023) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.20.064027 · Cited by 205
Self-citationDemonstration of non-Markovian process characterisation and control on a quantum processor
White, G. A. L., Hill, C. D., Pollock, F. A., Hollenberg, L. C. L., & Modi, K. K. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20113-3 · Cited by 137
Suppression of Crosstalk in Superconducting Qubits Using Dynamical Decoupling
Tripathi, V., Chen, H., Khezri, M., Yip, K.-W., Levenson-Falk, E. M., & Lidar, D. A. (2022) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.18.024068 · Cited by 148
Self-citationDetector tomography on IBM quantum computers and mitigation of an imperfect measurement
Chen, Y., Farahzad, M., Yoo, S., & Wei, T.-C. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.100.052315 · Cited by 142
Mitiq: A software package for error mitigation on noisy quantum computers
LaRose, R., Mari, A., Kaiser, S., Karalekas, P. J., Alves, A. A., Czarnik, P., Mandouh, M. E., Gordon, M. H., Hindy, Y., Robertson, A., et al. (2022) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2022-08-11-774 · Cited by 176
Mitigating Realistic Noise in Practical Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum Devices
Sun, J., Yuan, X., Tsunoda, T., Vedral, V., Benjamin, S. C., & Endo, S. (2021) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.15.034026 · Cited by 105
Demonstration of quantum volume 64 on a superconducting quantum computing system
Jurcevic, P., Javadi-Abhari, A., Bishop, L. S., Lauer, I., Bogorin, D. F., Brink, M., Capelluto, L., Günlük, O., Itoko, T., Kanazawa, N., et al. (2021) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/abe519 · Cited by 85
Wittler, N., Roy, F., Pack, K., Werninghaus, M., Roy, A. S., Egger, D. J., Filipp, S., Wilhelm, F. K., & Machnes, S. (2021) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.15.034080 · Cited by 103
Gauge-Symmetry Protection Using Single-Body Terms
Halimeh, J. C., Lang, H., Mildenberger, J., Zhang, J., & Hauke, P. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.040311 · Cited by 81
Entanglement Purification and Protection in a Superconducting Quantum Network
Yan, H., Zhong, Y., Chang, H.-S., Bienfait, A., Chou, M.-H., Conner, C. R., Dumur, É., Grebel, J., Povey, R. G., & Cleland, A. N. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.128.080504 · Cited by 79
ADAPT: Mitigating Idling Errors in Qubits via Adaptive Dynamical Decoupling
Das, P., Tannu, S., Dangwal, S., & Qureshi, M. (2021) · IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture (MICRO) · doi:10.1145/3466752.3480059 · Cited by 78
Digitized Counterdiabatic Quantum Algorithm for Protein Folding
Chandarana, P., Hegade, N. N., Montalban, I., Solano, E., & Chen, X. (2023) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.20.014024 · Cited by 68
Engineering Dynamical Sweet Spots to Protect Qubits from 1/f Noise
Huang, Z., Mundada, P., Gyenis, A., Schuster, D., Houck, A., & Koch, J. (2021) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.15.034065 · Cited by 72
Quantum Crosstalk Robust Quantum Control
Zhou, Z., Sitler, R., Oda, Y., Schultz, K., & Quiroz, G. (2023) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.131.210802 · Cited by 63
Quantum Optimization: Potential, Challenges, and the Path Forward
Abbas, A., (NNSA), U. N. N. S. A., Ambainis, A., Augustino, B., Bärtschi, A., Buhrman, H., Coffrin, C., Cortiana, G., Dunjko, V., Egger, D., et al. (2023) · OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) · doi:10.2172/2229681 · Cited by 65
Error-mitigated simulation of quantum many-body scars on quantum computers with pulse-level control
Chen, I.-C., Burdick, B., Yao, Y., Orth, P. P., & Iadecola, T. (2022) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.4.043027 · Cited by 63
Error per single-qubit gate below 10−4 in a superconducting qubit
Li, Z., Liu, P., Zhao, P., Mi, Z., Xu, H., Liang, X., Su, T., Sun, W., Xue, G., Zhang, J.-N., et al. (2023) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-023-00781-x · Cited by 72
Experimental test of non-macrorealistic cat states in the cloud
Ku, H.-Y., Lambert, N., Chan, F.-J., Emary, C., Chen, Y.-N., & Nori, F. (2020) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-020-00321-x · Cited by 55
Suppressing Quantum Circuit Errors Due to System Variability
Nation, P. D., & Treinish, M. (2023) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.4.010327 · Cited by 56
Demonstration of Algorithmic Quantum Speedup
Pokharel, B., & Lidar, D. A. (2023) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.130.210602 · Cited by 66
Self-citationA Hybrid Quantum-Classical Approach to Mitigating Measurement Errors in Quantum Algorithms
Kwon, H., & Bae, J. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Computers · doi:10.1109/tc.2020.3009664 · Cited by 54
Quantum Fourier Transform Using Dynamic Circuits
Bäumer, E., Tripathi, V., Seif, A., Lidar, D. A., & Wang, D. S. (2024) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.150602 · Cited by 49
Self-citationQuantum Annealing vs. QAOA: 127 Qubit Higher-Order Ising Problems on NISQ Computers
Pelofske, E., Bärtschi, A., & Eidenbenz, S. (2023) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-32041-5_13 · Cited by 47
Short-depth QAOA circuits and quantum annealing on higher-order ising models
Pelofske, E., Bärtschi, A., & Eidenbenz, S. (2024) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-024-00825-w · Cited by 49
Simulating Open Quantum System Dynamics on NISQ Computers with Generalized Quantum Master Equations
Wang, Y., Mulvihill, E., Hu, Z., Lyu, N., Shivpuje, S., Liu, Y., Soley, M. B., Geva, E., Batista, V. S., & Kais, S. (2023) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00316 · Cited by 49
Real-time calibration with spectator qubits
Majumder, S., de Castro, L. A., & Brown, K. R. (2020) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-020-0251-y · Cited by 44
Engineering Dynamically Decoupled Quantum Simulations with Trapped Ions
Morong, W., Collins, K. S., De, A., Stavropoulos, E., You, T., & Monroe, C. R. (2023) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.4.010334 · Cited by 42
VAQEM: A Variational Approach to Quantum Error Mitigation
Ravi, G. S., Smith, K. N., Gokhale, P., Mari, A., Earnest, N., Javadi-Abhari, A., & Chong, F. T. (2022) · IEEE International Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA) · doi:10.1109/hpca53966.2022.00029 · Cited by 19
Mundada, P., Barbosa, A., Maity, S., Wang, Y., Merkh, T., Stace, T. M., Nielson, F. F., Carvalho, A. R. R., Hush, M., Biercuk, M. J., et al. (2023) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.20.024034 · Cited by 51
Better-than-classical Grover search via quantum error detection and suppression
Pokharel, B., & Lidar, D. A. (2024) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-023-00794-6 · Cited by 49
Self-citationPredicting Non-Markovian Superconducting-Qubit Dynamics from Tomographic Reconstruction
Zhang, H., Pokharel, B., Levenson-Falk, E. M., & Lidar, D. A. (2022) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.17.054018 · Cited by 40
Self-citationYang, B., Raymond, R., & Uno, S. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.106.012423 · Cited by 40
Simulating Chemistry on Bosonic Quantum Devices
Dutta, R., Cabral, D. G. A., Lyu, N., Vu, N. P., Wang, Y., Allen, B., Dan, X., Cortiñas, R. G., Khazaei, P., Schäfer, M., et al. (2024) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00544 · Cited by 44
Self-citationNon-Markovian Noise Characterization with the Transfer Tensor Method
Chen, Y., Ma, K., Zheng, Y.-C., Allcock, J., Zhang, S., & Hsieh, C. (2020) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.13.034045 · Cited by 37
Hamiltonian open quantum system toolkit
Chen, H., & Lidar, D. A. (2022) · Communications Physics · doi:10.1038/s42005-022-00887-2 · Cited by 36
Self-citationQuantum Error Correction: Noise-Adapted Techniques and Applications
Jayashankar, A., & Mandayam, P. (2022) · Journal of the Indian Institute of Science · doi:10.1007/s41745-022-00332-x · Cited by 41
Well-conditioned multi-product formulas for hardware-friendly Hamiltonian simulation
Vazquez, A. C., Egger, D. J., Ochsner, D., & Woerner, S. (2023) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2023-07-25-1067 · Cited by 38
Pulse variational quantum eigensolver on cross-resonance-based hardware
Egger, D. J., Capecci, C., Pokharel, B., Barkoutsos, P. K., Fischer, L. E., Guidoni, L., & Tavernelli, I. (2023) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.5.033159 · Cited by 40
Self-citationQudit Dynamical Decoupling on a Superconducting Quantum Processor
Tripathi, V., Goss, N., Vezvaee, A., Nguyen, L. B., Siddiqi, I. A., & Lidar, D. A. (2025) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.134.050601 · Cited by 30
Self-citationHeralded nonlocal quantum gates for distributed quantum computation in a decoherence-free subspace
Su, W., Qin, W., Miranowicz, A., Li, T., & Nori, F. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.110.052612 · Cited by 27
Swain, M., Rai, A., Behera, B. K., & Panigrahi, P. K. (2019) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-019-2331-5 · Cited by 28
Hamiltonian simulation for hyperbolic partial differential equations by scalable quantum circuits
Sato, Y., Kondo, R., Hamamura, I., Onodera, T., & Yamamoto, N. (2024) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.6.033246 · Cited by 49
Impact of time-correlated noise on zero-noise extrapolation
Schultz, K., LaRose, R., Mari, A., Quiroz, G., Shammah, N., Clader, B. D., & Zeng, W. J. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.106.052406 · Cited by 28
Quantifying non-Markovian Memory in a Superconducting Quantum Computer
Morris, J., Pollock, F. A., & Modi, K. K. (2022) · Open Systems & Information Dynamics · doi:10.1142/s123016122250007x · Cited by 47
Adaptive variational simulation for open quantum systems
Chen, H., Gomes, N., Niu, S., & de Jong, W. A. (2024) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2024-02-13-1252 · Cited by 24
Dan, X., Geva, E., & Batista, V. S. (2025) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01565 · Cited by 28
Improving the estimation of environment parameters via initial probe-environment correlations
Ather, H., & Chaudhry, A. Z. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.104.012211 · Cited by 22
Extracting quantum dynamical resources: consumption of non-Markovianity for noise reduction
Berk, G. D., Milz, S., Pollock, F. A., & Modi, K. K. (2023) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-023-00774-w · Cited by 32
Suppressing Coherent Two-Qubit Errors via Dynamical Decoupling
Qiu, J., Zhou, Y., Hu, C.-K., Yuan, J., Zhang, L., Chu, J., Huang, W., Liu, W., Luo, K., Ni, Z., et al. (2021) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.16.054047 · Cited by 19
Testing Platform-Independent Quantum Error Mitigation on Noisy Quantum Computers
Russo, V., Mari, A., Shammah, N., LaRose, R., & Zeng, W. J. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering · doi:10.1109/tqe.2023.3305232 · Cited by 30
Pulse-efficient quantum machine learning
Melo, A., Earnest, N., & Tacchino, F. (2023) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2023-10-09-1130 · Cited by 28
High-fidelity robust qubit control by phase-modulated pulses
Kuzmanović, M., Björkman, I., McCord, J. J., Dogra, S., & Paraoanu, G. S. (2024) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.6.013188 · Cited by 20
Entangling Transmons with Low-Frequency Protected Superconducting Qubits
Maiani, A., Kjærgaard, M., & Schrade, C. (2022) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.3.030329 · Cited by 20
Navigating the Dynamic Noise Landscape of Variational Quantum Algorithms with QISMET
Ravi, G. S., Smith, K. N., Baker, J. M., Kannan, T., Earnest, N., Javadi-Abhari, A., Hoffmann, H., & Chong, F. T. (2023) · International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS) · doi:10.1145/3575693.3575739 · Cited by 27
Suppressing Correlated Noise in Quantum Computers via Context-Aware Compiling
Seif, A., Liao, H., Tripathi, V., Krsulich, K., Malekakhlagh, M., Amico, M., Jurcevic, P., & Javadi-Abhari, A. (2024) · Proceedings - International Symposium on Computer Architecture/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/isca59077.2024.00031 · Cited by 23
Learning how to dynamically decouple by optimizing rotational gates
Rahman, A., Egger, D. J., & Arenz, C. (2024) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.22.054074 · Cited by 26
Accelerated adiabatic quantum search algorithm via pulse control in a non-Markovian environment
Ren, F.-H., Wang, Z.-M., & Wu, L.-A. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.102.062603 · Cited by 18
Programming physical quantum systems with pulse-level control
Smith, K. N., Ravi, G. S., Alexander, T., Bronn, N. T., Carvalho, A. R. R., Cervera-Lierta, A., Chong, F. T., Chow, J. M., Cubeddu, M., Hashim, A., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Physics · doi:10.3389/fphy.2022.900099 · Cited by 24
Modeling Low- and High-Frequency Noise in Transmon Qubits with Resource-Efficient Measurement
Tripathi, V., Chen, H., Levenson-Falk, E. M., & Lidar, D. A. (2024) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.5.010320 · Cited by 16
Self-citationProcess tomography of robust dynamical decoupling with superconducting qubits
Souza, A. M. (2021) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-021-03176-z · Cited by 16
Testing Scalable Bell Inequalities for Quantum Graph States on IBM Quantum Devices
Yang, B., Raymond, R., Imai, H., Chang, H., & Hiraishi, H. (2022) · IEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems · doi:10.1109/jetcas.2022.3201730 · Cited by 19
TimeStitch: Exploiting Slack to Mitigate Decoherence in Quantum Circuits
Smith, K. N., Ravi, G. S., Murali, P., Baker, J. M., Earnest, N., Javadi-Abhari, A., & Chong, F. T. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing · doi:10.1145/3548778 · Cited by 54
VarSaw: Application-tailored Measurement Error Mitigation for Variational Quantum Algorithms
Dangwal, S., Ravi, G. S., Das, P., Smith, K. N., Baker, J. M., & Chong, F. T. (2023) · International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS) · doi:10.1145/3623278.3624764 · Cited by 18
Implementing a Ternary Decomposition of the Toffoli Gate on Fixed-FrequencyTransmon QutritsPreprint
Galda, A., Cubeddu, M., Kanazawa, N., Narang, P., & Earnest, N. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.00558 · Cited by 35
Optimizing quantum algorithms on bipotent architectures
Ji, Y., Koenig, K. F., & Polian, I. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.108.022610 · Cited by 14
Quantum-Centric Computational Study of Methylene Singlet and Triplet States
Liepuoniute, I., Doney, K. D., Moreno, J. R., Job, J., Friend, W. S., & Jones, G. O. (2025) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.5c00075 · Cited by 38
Protectability of IBMQ Qubits by Dynamical Decoupling Technique
Mena, A., & Wu, L.-A. (2022) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym15010062 · Cited by 13
Defining Best Practices for Quantum Benchmarks
Amico, M., Zhang, H., Jurcevic, P., Bishop, L. S., Nation, P., Wack, A., & McKay, D. C. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) · doi:10.1109/qce57702.2023.00084 · Cited by 16
Mitigating controller noise in quantum gates using optimal control theory
Aroch, A., Kosloff, R., & Kallush, S. (2024) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2024-09-25-1482 · Cited by 14
Goto, H., Ho, Y., & Kanao, T. (2023) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.5.043137 · Cited by 12
Roszak, K., & Korbicz, J. K. (2023) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2023-02-16-923 · Cited by 11
Multi-ion Frequency Reference Using Dynamical Decoupling
Pelzer, L., Dietze, K., Martínez-Lahuerta, V. J., Krinner, L., Kramer, J., Dawel, F., Spethmann, N., Hammerer, K., & Schmidt, P. O. (2024) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.033203 · Cited by 11
Dynamically generated decoherence-free subspaces and subsystems on superconducting qubits
Quiroz, G., Pokharel, B., Boen, J., Tewala, L., Tripathi, V., Williams, D., Wu, L.-A., Titum, P., Schultz, K., & Lidar, D. A. (2024) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ad6805 · Cited by 15
Self-citationSimulation of a Diels–Alder reaction on a quantum computer
Liepuoniute, I., Motta, M., Pellegrini, T., Rice, J. E., Gujarati, T. P., Gil, S., & Jones, G. O. (2024) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/d4cp01314j · Cited by 17
Benchmarking quantum state transfer on quantum devices
Huang, Y.-T., Lin, J.-D., Ku, H.-Y., & Chen, Y.-N. (2021) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.023038 · Cited by 13
Error Mitigation in Quantum Computers through Instruction SchedulingPreprint
Smith, K. N., Ravi, G. S., Murali, P., Baker, J. M., Earnest, N., Javadi-Abhari, A., & Chong, F. T. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.01760 · Cited by 11
Quantum Control Modelling, Methods, and Applications
Dehaghani, N. B., Перейра, Ф. Л., & Aguiar, A. P. (2022) · doi:10.21467/exr.2.1.5037 · Cited by 10
Empirical Learning of Dynamical Decoupling on Quantum Processors
Tong, C., Zhang, H., & Pokharel, B. (2025) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/h7pq-s159 · Cited by 10
Self-citationError rate reduction of single-qubit gates via noise-aware decomposition into native gates
Maldonado, T. J., Flick, J., Krastanov, S., & Galda, A. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-10339-0 · Cited by 15
Demonstration of Algorithmic Quantum Speedup for an Abelian Hidden Subgroup Problem
Singkanipa, P., Kasatkin, V., Zhou, Z., Quiroz, G., & Lidar, D. A. (2025) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.15.021082 · Cited by 10
Self-citationPosition Papers for the ASCR Workshop on Basic Research Needs in Quantum Computing and Networking
Lougovski, P., Parekh, O., Broz, J., Byrd, M., Chembo, Y. K., de Jong, W. A., Figueroa, E. V., Humble, T. S., Larson, J. M., Quiroz, G., et al. (2023) · OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) · doi:10.2172/2283320 · Cited by 10
Ji, Y., & Polian, I. (2024) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e26070586 · Cited by 12
Protecting logical qubits with dynamical decoupling
Han, J.-X., Zhang, J., Xue, G., Yu, H., & Long, G. (2025) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/lm8x-r48q · Cited by 10
Many-qubit protection-operation dilemma from the perspective of many-body localization
Silveri, M., & Orell, T. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-33657-3 · Cited by 9
Operational Markovianization in randomized benchmarking
Figueroa–Romero, P., Papič, M., Auer, A., Hsieh, M.-H., Modi, K. K., & de Vega, I. (2024) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ad3f44 · Cited by 11
Experimental pairwise entanglement estimation for an N-qubit system
Thompson, N. L., Nguyen, N. H., Behrman, E., & Steck, J. E. (2020) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-020-02877-1 · Cited by 10
Stabilizing two-qubit entanglement with dynamically decoupled active feedback
Greenfield, S., Martin, L. S., Motzoi, F., Whaley, K. B., Dressel, J., & Levenson-Falk, E. M. (2024) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.21.024022 · Cited by 8
Umer, M., Mastorakis, E., Evangelou, S., & Angelakis, D. G. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.111.012626 · Cited by 12
Coote, P. W., Dimov, R., Maity, S., Hartnett, G. S., Biercuk, M. J., & Baum, Y. (2025) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.6.010332 · Cited by 11
Variational Quantum Algorithms in the era of Early Fault Tolerance
Dangwal, S., Vittal, S., Seifert, L. M., Chong, F. T., & Ravi, G. S. (2025) · Proceedings - International Symposium on Computer Architecture/Proceedings · doi:10.1145/3695053.3731112 · Cited by 13
Yan, R., & Feng, Z. (2020) · Optics & Laser Technology · doi:10.1016/j.optlastec.2020.106699 · Cited by 8
DISQ: Dynamic Iteration Skipping for Variational Quantum Algorithms
Zhang, J., Wang, H., Ravi, G. S., Chong, F. T., Han, S., Mueller, F., & Chen, Y. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) · doi:10.1109/qce57702.2023.00120 · Cited by 12
Estimation of the Laser Frequency Noise Spectrum by Continuous Dynamical Decoupling
Zhang, M., Xie, Y., Zhang, J., Wang, W., Wu, C.-W., Chen, T., Wu, W., & Chen, P. (2021) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.15.014033 · Cited by 8
Designing arbitrary single-axis rotations robust against perpendicular time-dependent noise
Li, B., Calderon-Vargas, F. A., Zeng, J., & Barnes, E. (2021) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ac22ea · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Pokharel, B., Anand, N., Fortman, B., & Lidar, D. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern California (US)
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2018-11-29
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 220502-220502
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2884173913
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 15
- FWCI
- 7.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Bulletin of the American Physical Society
- Funders
- Oracle
- Lockheed Martin
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Keywords
- dynamical decoupling, superconducting qubits, transmon qubits, decoherence suppression, gate fidelity, dephasing, spontaneous emission, entanglement protection, two-qubit gates, IBM Quantum
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
