Experimental Realization of a Quantum Autoencoder: The Compression of Qutrits via Machine Learning
Open accessAbstract
With quantum resources a precious commodity, their efficient use is highly desirable. Quantum autoencoders have been proposed as a way to reduce quantum memory requirements. Generally, an autoencoder is a device that uses machine learning to compress inputs, that is, to represent the input data in a lower-dimensional space. Here, we experimentally realize a quantum autoencoder, which learns how to compress quantum data using a classical optimization routine. We demonstrate that when the inherent structure of the dataset allows lossless compression, our autoencoder reduces qutrits to qubits with low error levels. We also show that the device is able to perform with minimal prior information about the quantum data or physical system and is robust to perturbations during its optimization routine.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A local version of the autoencoder cost function was proposed and shown to train well for large-scale problems.
“Recently, a local version of this cost function was also proposed and was shown to train well for large-scale problems [166].”
From Variational quantum algorithms (2021) · cites this paper as [166]
The supplied passage labeled Abstract describes a different autoencoder cost function based on junk-mode occupation, and another reports training a device with that function. The experiment compressed qutrits to qubits; our copy does not show that this cost function was proposed as a local version or trained well on large-scale problems. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition
Nielsen, M. A., & Chuang, I. L. (2012) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511976667 · Cited by 8,436 · see citing works
Biamonte, J., Wittek, P., Pancotti, N., Rebentrost, P., Wiebe, N., & Lloyd, S. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature23474 · Cited by 4,779 · see citing works
Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S., & Maccone, L. (2011) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2011.35 · Cited by 3,894 · see citing works
Deep learning with coherent nanophotonic circuits
Shen, Y., Harris, N. C., Skirlo, S., Prabhu, M., Baehr-Jones, T., Hochberg, M., Sun, X., Zhao, S., Larochelle, H., Englund, D., et al. (2017) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2017.93 · Cited by 3,340 · see citing works
A survey of deep neural network architectures and their applications
Liu, W., Wang, Z., Liu, X., Zeng, N., Liu, Y., & Alsaadi, F. E. (2017) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2016.12.038 · Cited by 3,239 · see citing works
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition
Nielsen, M. A., & Chuang, I. L. (2011) · Cited by 2,724 · see citing works
Deep learning for visual understanding: A review
Guo, Y., Liu, Y., Oerlemans, A., Lao, S., Wu, S., & Lew, M. S. (2016) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2015.09.116 · Cited by 2,504 · see citing works
Experimental realization of any discrete unitary operator
Reck, M., Zeilinger, A., Bernstein, H. J., & Bertani, P. (1994) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.73.58 · Cited by 2,155 · see citing works
Proceedings of the 56th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing
(2024) · doi:10.1145/3618260 · Cited by 1,842 · see citing works
Machine learning & artificial intelligence in the quantum domain: a review of recent progress
Dunjko, V., & Briegel, H. J. (2018) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aab406 · Cited by 1,132 · see citing works
Carolan, J., Harrold, C., Sparrow, C., Martín-López, E., Russell, N. J., Silverstone, J. W., Shadbolt, P. J., Matsuda, N., Oguma, M., Itoh, M., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aab3642 · Cited by 1,093 · see citing works
Quantum autoencoders for efficient compression of quantum data
Romero, J., Olson, J. P., & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2017) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/aa8072 · Cited by 559 · see citing works
Quantum generalisation of feedforward neural networks
Wan, K. H., Dahlsten, O., Kristjánsson, H., Gardner, R., & Kim, M. S. (2017) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-017-0032-4 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
Experimental Realization of Quantum Artificial Intelligence
Zhaokai, L., Xiaomei, L., Nanyang, X., & jiangfeng, D. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1410.1054 · Cited by 261 · see citing works
Experimental Realization of a Quantum Support Vector Machine
Li, Z., Liu, X., Xu, N., & Du, J. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.140504 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Experimental quantum Hamiltonian learning
Wang, J., Paesani, S., Santagati, R., Knauer, S., Gentile, A. A., Wiebe, N., Petruzzella, M., O’Brien, J. L., Rarity, J., Laing, A., et al. (2017) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys4074 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
Unconditional violation of the shot-noise limit in photonic quantum metrology
Slussarenko, S., Weston, M. M., Chrzanowski, H. M., Shalm, L. K., Verma, V. B., Nam, S. W., & Pryde, G. J. (2017) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/s41566-017-0011-5 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Self-citationEntanglement-Based Machine Learning on a Quantum Computer
Cai, X., Wu, D., Su, Z.-E., Chen, M.-C., Wang, X., Li, L., Liu, N.-L., Lu, C., & Pan, J.-W. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.110504 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Experimental Machine Learning of Quantum States
Gao, J., Qiao, L., Jiao, Z., Ma, Y., Hu, C.-Q., Ren, R.-J., Yang, A.-L., Tang, H. L., Yung, M., & Jin, X. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.240501 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Quantum autoencoders via quantum adders with genetic algorithms
Lamata, L., Alvarez-Rodriguez, U., Martín-Guerrero, J. D., Sanz, M., & Solano, E. (2018) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/aae22b · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Quantum autoencoders via quantum adders with genetic algorithms
Lamata, L., Alvarez-Rodriguez, U., Martín‐Guerrero, J. D., Sanz, M., & Solano, E. (2019) · LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Quantum Data Compression of a Qubit Ensemble
Rozema, L. A., Mahler, D. H., Hayat, A., Turner, P. S., & Steinberg, A. M. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.160504 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Causal Asymmetry in a Quantum World
Thompson, J., Garner, A. J., Mahoney, J. R., et al. (2018) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Autonomous calibration of single spin qubit operations
Frank, F., Unden, T., Zoller, J., Said, R. S., Calarco, T., Montangero, S., Naydenov, B., & Jelezko, F. (2017) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-017-0049-8 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Optical implementation of the encoding of two qubits to a single qutrit
Bartůšková, L., Černoch, A., Filip, R., Fiurášek, J., Soubusta, J., & Dušek, M. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.74.022325 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Causal Asymmetry in a Quantum World
Thompson, J., Garner, A. J. P., Mahoney, J. R., et al. (2018) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.8.031013 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- G. R. Steinbrecher, J. P. Olson, D. Englund, and J. Carolan, arXiv:1808.10047. · arXiv
- Y. Ding, L. Lamata, M. Sanz, X. Chen, and E. Solano, arXiv:1807.10643. · arXiv
- See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/ supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.060501 for further details.
- M. Krenn, M. Malik, T. Scheidl, R. Ursin, and A. Zeilinger, in Optics in Our Time, edited by M. D. Al-Amri, M. El-Gomati, and M. S. Zubairy (Springer International Pub- lishing, Cham, 2016), pp. 455-482.
- S. Yu, F. Albarrán-Arriagada, J. C. Retamal, Y.-T. Wang, W. Liu, Z.-J. Ke, Y. Meng, Z.-P. Li, J.-S. Tang, E. Solano, L. Lamata, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, arXiv:1808.09241. · arXiv
- A. Laing, Quantum photonic circuits and high dimensional systems, Ph.D. thesis, University of Bristol, 2011.
- E. Martín-López, Photonic quantum information processing with the complex Hadamard operator, Ph. D. thesis, Uni- versity of Bristol, 2014.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Variational quantum algorithms
Cerezo, M., Arrasmith, A., Babbush, R., Benjamin, S. C., Endo, S., Fujii, K., McClean, J. R., Mitarai, K., Yuan, X., Cincio, L., et al. (2021) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-021-00348-9 · Cited by 3,385 · see citing works
“Quantum autoencoders have seen experimental implementation on quantum hardware [142], and will likely be an important primitive in quantum machine learning.”
BackgroundNoisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms
Bharti, K., Cervera-Lierta, A., Kyaw, T. H., Haug, T., Alperin-Lea, S., Anand, A., Degroote, M., Heimonen, H., Kottmann, J. S., Menke, T., et al. (2022) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.94.015004 · Cited by 1,726 · see citing works
Cost function dependent barren plateaus in shallow parametrized quantum circuits
Cerezo, M., Sone, A., Volkoff, T., Cincio, L., & Coles, P. J. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-21728-w · Cited by 1,047 · see citing works
Photonic quantum information processing: a concise review
Slussarenko, S., & Pryde, G. J. (2019) · Applied Physics Reviews · doi:10.1063/1.5115814 · Cited by 644 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Pepper, A., Tischler, N., & Pryde, G. J.
- Affiliations
- Griffith University (AU)
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2019-02-11
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 060501-060501
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2952384119
- Cited by
- 97
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 5.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Australian Research Council (DP160101911)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Keywords
- quantum autoencoders, quantum data compression, lossless compression, robustness to disturbances
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review