PreprintCited by 261Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Information and CryptographyQuantum many-body systems

Experimental Realization of Quantum Artificial Intelligence

Open access
Zhaokai, Li, Xiaomei, Liu, Nanyang, Xu, jiangfeng, Du·2014·arXiv

Abstract

Machines are possible to have some artificial intelligence like human beings owing to particular algorithms or software. Such machines could learn knowledge from what people taught them and do works according to the knowledge. In practical learning cases, the data is often extremely complicated and large, thus classical learning machines often need huge computational resources. Quantum machine learning algorithm, on the other hand, could be exponentially faster than classical machines using quantum parallelism. Here, we demonstrate a quantum machine learning algorithm on a four-qubit NMR test bench to solve an optical character recognition problem, also known as the handwriting recognition. The quantum machine learns standard character fonts and then recognize handwritten characters from a set with two candidates. To our best knowledge, this is the first artificial intelligence realized on a quantum processor. Due to the widespreading importance of artificial intelligence and its tremendous consuming of computational resources, quantum speedup would be extremely attractive against the challenges from the Big Data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1410.1054

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Quantum computing technology is one of the most promising tools in the ML area.

    “Instantaneous processing of huge datasets and solving the optimization task make the quantum computing technology one of the most promising tools in the ML area [13].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhaokai, L., Xiaomei, L., Nanyang, X., & jiangfeng, D.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2014
Volume
114
Issue
14
Pages
140504-140504
ISSN
0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1529944915
Cited by
261
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2
FWCI
8.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61376128, 91021005, 11227901)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB01030400)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
Keywords
quantum support vector machine, quantum machine learning, quantum advantage, handwriting recognition, NMR quantum computing, four-qubit systems, character recognition, big data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review