The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Robust Concurrent Remote Entanglement Between Two Superconducting Qubits
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
An arbitrary polarization qubit can be optimally cloned using the HOM effect by interfering it on a beam splitter with an ancilla in a maximally mixed polarization state.
“For example, an arbitrary polarization qubit |1 s = α |1 H + β |1 V , where |α| 2 + |β| 2 = 1, can be optimally cloned using the HOM effect by interfering it on a beam splitter with an ancilla that is in a maximally mixed polarization state”
From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [114]
The Overview of Experiment and Protocol describes microwave photons interfering at a beam-splitter equivalent, and the Error Analysis mentions Hong–Ou–Mandel interference. Neither passage addresses cloning a polarization qubit with a maximally mixed ancilla. Searches for optimal cloning, polarization, and a mixed-state ancilla found no passage supporting that claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredOptimal 1→2 cloning of a qudit can be achieved with a fidelity F_cloning = 1/2 + 1/(d+1).
“Optimal 1 → 2 cloning (i.e. two clones of one original state) of a qudit can be achieved with a fidelity of F cloning = 1 2 + 1 d+1 [114][115][116][117].”
From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [114]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Entanglement of Formation of an Arbitrary State of Two Qubits
Wootters, W. K. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.2245 · Cited by 8,290
Kimble, H. J. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07127 · Cited by 6,023
Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference
Hong, C. K., Ou, Z. Y., & Mandel, L. (1987) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.59.2044 · Cited by 4,369
Strong coupling of a single photon to a superconducting qubit using circuit quantum electrodynamics
Wallraff, A., Schuster, D. I., Blais, A., Frunzio, L., Huang, R. S., Majer, J., Kumar, S., Girvin, S. M., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02851 · Cited by 3,796
Self-citationModular entanglement of atomic qubits using photons and phonons
Hucul, D., Inlek, I. V., Vittorini, G., Crocker, C., Debnath, S., Clark, S. M., & Monroe, C. (2015) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys3150 · Cited by 311
Single microwave-photon detector using an artificial Λ-type three-level system
Inomata, K., Lin, Z., Koshino, K., Oliver, W. D., Tsai, J.-S., Yamamoto, T., & Nakamura, Y. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms12303 · Cited by 203
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 42
- 10.1002/andp.19013090310 · DOI
- 10.1002/andp.19053220607 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRev.130.2529 · DOI · Paper page
- C. Cohen-Tannoudji, 1998, Atom-Photon Interactions, 10.1002/9783527617197 · DOI · Paper page
- S. Haroche, 2006, Exploring the Quantum, 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198509141.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature05461 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature06126 · DOI
- 10.1038/nphys1845 · DOI
- 10.1038/nphys2612 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.217401 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.035132 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.240501 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.170501 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.2773988 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature09035 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature06118 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1221856 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature12016 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature15759 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nphys3605 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.59.1025 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.71.060310 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.89.022317 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.76.042319 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.93.033817 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevX.4.041010 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.062320 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1063/1.4959241 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevX.6.011022 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.050507 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.014506 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.722 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.067901 · DOI
- 10.1088/0957-4484/22/31/315302 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.240502 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.4883373 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.5.011001 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.080501 · DOI · Paper page
- H. Carmichael, 1993, An Open Systems Approach to Quantum Optics, 10.1007/978-3-540-47620-7 · DOI · Paper page
- C. Gardiner, 2004, Quantum Noise
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.120501 · DOI
- M. A. Nielsen, 2004, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect
Bouchard, F., Sit, A., Zhang, Y., Fickler, R., Miatto, F. M., Yao, Y., Sciarrino, F., & Karimi, E. (2021) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/abcd7a · Cited by 232
Single microwave-photon detector using an artificial Λ-type three-level system
Inomata, K., Lin, Z., Koshino, K., Oliver, W. D., Tsai, J.-S., Yamamoto, T., & Nakamura, Y. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms12303 · Cited by 203
McKenna, T. P., Witmer, J. D., Patel, R. N., Jiang, W., Van Laer, R., Arrangoiz-Arriola, P., Wollack, E. A., Herrmann, J. F., & Safavi-Naeini, A. H. (2020) · Optica · doi:10.1364/optica.397235 · Cited by 130
Metadata
- Authors
- Narla, A., Shankar, S., Hatridge, M., Leghtas, Z., Sliwa, K. M., Zalys-Geller, E., Mundhada, S. O., Pfaff, W., Frunzio, L., Schoelkopf, R. J., & Devoret, M. H.
- Venue
- Physical Review X
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2016-09-06
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 2160-3308
- Cited by
- 115
- References
- 6
- Language
- en
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (DMR 1119826, PHY1309996)
- Army Research Office (W911NF-14-1-0011)
- Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FP057123-C)
- Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
- Yale Institute for Nanoscience and Quantum Engineering
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
