Cited by 70

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Conditional-Phase Switch at the Single-Photon Level

Resch, Kevin J., Lundeen, Jeffrey S., Steinberg, Aephraim M.·2002·Physical Review Letters

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.89.037904

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Early experiments involved a parity check of two polarisation qubits on a polarising beam splitter and a two-photon conditional phase switch.

    “polarisation qubits on a polarising beam splitter (Pittman et al. 2002b), and a two-photon conditional phase switch (Resch et al. 2002).”

    From Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits (2007) · cites this paper as Resch et al. 2002

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. C. H. Bennett, 1984, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems & Signal Processing, Bangalore, India
  2. W. T. Buttler, 1998, Phys. Rev. Lett., 81, 3283, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.3283 · DOI
  3. N. A. Gershenfeld, 1997, Science, 275, 350, 10.1126/science.275.5298.350 · DOI · Paper page
  4. J. A. Jones, 1998, Nature (London), 393, 344, 10.1038/30687 · DOI · Paper page
  5. D. G. Cory, 1998, Phys. Rev. Lett., 81, 2152, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.2152 · DOI · Paper page
  6. B. E. Kane, 1998, Nature (London), 393, 133, 10.1038/30156 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Q. A. Turchette, 1995, Phys. Rev. Lett., 75, 4710, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.4710 · DOI · Paper page
  8. A. Rauschenbeutel, 1999, Phys. Rev. Lett., 83, 5166, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.5166 · DOI
  9. G. Nogues, 1999, Nature (London), 400, 239, 10.1038/22275 · DOI
  10. P. W. H. Pinkse, 2000, Nature (London), 404, 365, 10.1038/35006006 · DOI
  11. A. Sørensen, 1999, Phys. Rev. Lett., 82, 1971, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.1971 · DOI
  12. C. Monroe, 1995, Phys. Rev. Lett., 75, 4714, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.4714 · DOI · Paper page
  13. G. K. Brennen, 1999, Phys. Rev. Lett., 82, 1060, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.1060 · DOI
  14. D. Jaksch, 2000, Phys. Rev. Lett., 85, 2208, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.2208 · DOI · Paper page
  15. K. J. Resch, 2001, Phys. Rev. Lett., 87, 123603, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.123603 · DOI
  16. K. J. Resch, 2002, J. Mod. Opt., 49, 487, 10.1080/09500340110088623 · DOI
  17. S. E. Harris, 1999, Phys. Rev. Lett., 82, 4611, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.4611 · DOI
  18. M. M. Kash, 1999, Phys. Rev. Lett., 82, 5229, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.5229 · DOI
  19. J. D. Franson, 1997, Phys. Rev. Lett., 78, 3852, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.3852 · DOI
  20. M. A. Nielsen, 2000, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information
  21. R. Loudon, 1973, The Quantum Theory of Light
  22. J. W. Noh, 1991, Phys. Rev. Lett., 67, 1426, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.1426 · DOI
  23. K. J. Resch, 2002, Phys. Rev. Lett., 88, 113601, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.113601 · DOI
  24. G. T. Foster, 2000, Phys. Rev. Lett., 85, 3149, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.3149 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Resch, K. J., Lundeen, J. S., & Steinberg, A. M.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2002-06-28
Volume
89
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 0031-9007
  • 1079-7114
Cited by
70
References
7
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review