Cited by 459Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesRelativity and Gravitational Theory

C P T Violation Implies Violation of Lorentz Invariance

Open access
Greenberg, O. W.·2002·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

A interacting theory that violates CPT invariance necessarily violates Lorentz invariance. On the other hand, CPT invariance is not sufficient for out-of-cone Lorentz invariance. Theories that violate CPT by having different particle and antiparticle masses must be nonlocal.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.89.231602

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CPT violation implies Lorentz violation for local field theories.

    “Conversely, however, CPT violation implies Lorentz violation for local field theories [134].”

    From Modern Tests of Lorentz Invariance (2005) · cites this paper as [134]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. [2][2] R. Jost, Helv. Phys. Acta 30, 409 (1957). -
  2. [4][4] D.Colladay and V.A. Kosteleck´ y, Phys. Rev. D 55, 6760 (1997); 58, 116002 (1998). -
  3. [5][5] V.A. Kosteleck´ y and R. Lehnert, Phys. Rev. D 63, 065008 (2001). -
  4. [6][6] Proc. Meeting on CPT and Lorentz Symmetry , (World Scientific, Singapore, 1999), ed. V.A. Kosteleck´ y. -
  5. [7][7] H. Murayama and T. Yanagida, Phys. Lett. B 520, 263 (2001); hep-ph/0010178. - · arXiv
  6. [8][8] G. Barenboim, et al, JHEP 0210, 001 (2002); hep-ph/0108199. - · arXiv
  7. [9][9] G. Barenboim, L. Borissov and J. Lykken, Phys.Lett.B 534, 106 (2002); hepph/0201080. -
  8. [14][14] M. Chretien and R.E. Peierls, Nuovo Cimento 10, 668 (1953) and Proc. Roy. Soc. A 223, 468 (1954). -
  9. [15][15] R. Marnelius, Phys. Rev. D 10, 341 (1974) gives a later discussion of nonlocal theories.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Greenberg, O. W.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Greenberg, O. W.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2002-11-18
Volume
89
Issue
23
Pages
231602-231602
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W1964922929
Cited by
459
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 25
FWCI
7.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Keywords
CPT violation, Lorentz violation, nonlocal theory, interacting quantum field theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review