Cited by 422Quantum many-body systemsAdvanced Condensed Matter PhysicsTheoretical and Computational Physics

Quantum Orders in an Exact Soluble Model

Open access
Wen, Xiao-Gang·2003·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We find all the exact eigenstates and eigenvalues of a spin-$1/2$ model on square lattice: $H=16g\ensuremath{\sum}_{\mathbit{i}}{S}_{\mathbit{i}}^{y}{S}_{\mathbit{i}+\stackrel{^}{\mathbit{x}}}^{x}{S}_{\mathbit{i}+\stackrel{^}{\mathbit{x}}+\stackrel{^}{\mathbit{y}}}^{y}{S}_{\mathbit{i}+\stackrel{^}{\mathbit{y}}}^{x}$. We show that the ground states for $g<0$ and $g>0$ have different quantum orders described by $Z2A$ and $Z2B$ projective symmetry groups. The phase transition at $g=0$ represents a new kind of phase transition that changes quantum orders but not symmetry. Both the $Z2A$ and $Z2B$ states contain ${Z}_{2}$ lattice gauge theories at low energies. They have robust topologically degenerate ground states and gapless edge excitations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.90.016803

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ZXXZ variant of the surface code helps symmetrize the X- and Z-basis logical error rates.

    “We also remove certain Hadamard gates to implement the ZXXZ variant of the surface code44,45, which helps symmetrize the X- and Z-basis logical error rates.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wen, X.-G.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Wen, Xiao-Gang
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2003-01-10
Volume
90
Issue
1
Pages
016803-016803
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2045176588
Cited by
422
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 14
FWCI
4.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Advanced Condensed Matter Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Theoretical and Computational Physics
Keywords
quantum order, projective symmetry group, exact eigenstates, ground state degeneracy, Z2 lattice gauge theory, quantum phase transitions, topological order

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review