The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Experimental Investigation of Criteria for Continuous Variable Entanglement
Open accessAbstract
We generate a pair of entangled beams from the interference of two amplitude squeezed beams. The entanglement is quantified in terms of EPR paradox and inseparability criteria, with both results clearly beating the standard quantum limit. We experimentally analyze the effect of decoherence on each criterion and demonstrate qualitative differences. We also characterize the number of required and excess photons present in the entangled beams and provide contour plots of the efficacy of quantum information protocols in terms of these variables.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.47.777 · Cited by 16,654
Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels
Bennett, C. H., Brassard, G., Crépeau, C., Jozsa, R., Peres, A., & Wootters, W. K. (1993) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.70.1895 · Cited by 13,703
Peres-Horodecki Separability Criterion for Continuous Variable Systems
Simon, R. (2000) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.84.2726 · Cited by 2,245
Inseparability Criterion for Continuous Variable Systems
Duan, L.-M., Giedke, G., Cirac, J. I., & Zoller, P. (2000) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.84.2722 · Cited by 2,064
DiVincenzo, D. P. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.270.5234.255 · Cited by 1,651
Cited by
Experimental criteria for steering and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox
Cavalcanti, E. G., Jones, S. J., Wiseman, H. M., & Reid, M. D. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.80.032112 · Cited by 608
Howell, J. C., Bennink, R. S., Bentley, S. J., & Boyd, R. W. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.92.210403 · Cited by 522
Squeezed states of light and their applications in laser interferometers
Schnabel, R. (2017) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.04.001 · Cited by 513
Self-citationExperimental EPR-steering using Bell-local states
Saunders, D. J., Jones, S. J., Wiseman, H. M., & Pryde, G. J. (2010) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1766 · Cited by 448
Integrated photonic platform for quantum information with continuous variables
Lenzini, F., Janousek, J., Thearle, O., Villa, M., Haylock, B., Kasture, S., Cui, L., Phan, H.-P., Dao, D. V., Yonezawa, H., et al. (2018) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aat9331 · Cited by 159
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bowen, W. P., Schnabel, R., Lam, P. K., & Ralph, T. C.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2003-01-29
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 043601-043601
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2963222283
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 17.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimental Investigation of Criteria for Continuous Variable Entanglement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.90.043601
- The paper
- Bowen, W. P., Schnabel, R., Lam, P. K., & Ralph, T. C. (2003). Experimental Investigation of Criteria for Continuous Variable Entanglement. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.90.043601
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
