Cited by 132Quantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture

Quantum Dense Coding with Atomic Qubits

Schaetz, T., Barrett, M. D., Leibfried, D., Chiaverini, J., Britton, J., Itano, W. M., Jost, J. D., Langer, C. +1 more·2004·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We report the implementation of quantum dense coding on individual atomic qubits with the use of two trapped 9Be+ ions. The protocol is implemented with a complete Bell measurement that distinguishes the four operations used to encode two bits of classical information. We measure an average transmission fidelity of 0.85(1) and determine a channel capacity of 1.16(1).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.93.040505

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Performance of the PPBS gates is limited almost exclusively by mode matching, primarily spatial.

    “Performance of the PPBS gates are limited almost exclusively by mode matching, primarily spatial, making these gates promising candidates for micro-or integrated-optical implementations, where nonclassical mode matching in excess of 99% can be expected [21].”
  • The PPBS gates are promising candidates for micro- or integrated-optical implementations.

    “Performance of the PPBS gates are limited almost exclusively by mode matching, primarily spatial, making these gates promising candidates for micro-or integrated-optical implementations, where nonclassical mode matching in excess of 99% can be expected [21].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schaetz, T., Barrett, M. D., Leibfried, D., Chiaverini, J., Britton, J., Itano, W. M., Jost, J. D., Langer, C., & Wineland, D. J.
Affiliations
National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2004-07-22
Volume
93
Issue
4
Pages
040505-040505
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2097200546
Cited by
132
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
7.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Keywords
quantum dense coding, atomic qubits, trapped ions, quantum channel capacity, transmission fidelity, quantum information encoding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review