Cited by 1,043Quantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum Information and CryptographyMechanical and Optical Resonators

Experimental violation of a Bell's inequality with efficient detection

Rowe, M. A., Kielpinski, D., Meyer, V., Sackett, C. A., Itano, W. M., Monroe, C., Wineland, D. J.·2001·Nature

Abstract

Local realism is the idea that objects have definite properties whether or not they are measured, and that measurements of these properties are not affected by events taking place sufficiently far away. Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen used these reasonable assumptions to conclude that quantum mechanics is incomplete. Starting in 1965, Bell and others constructed mathematical inequalities whereby experimental tests could distinguish between quantum mechanics and local realistic theories. Many experiments have since been done that are consistent with quantum mechanics and inconsistent with local realism. But these conclusions remain the subject of considerable interest and debate, and experiments are still being refined to overcome 'loopholes' that might allow a local realistic interpretation. Here we have measured correlations in the classical properties of massive entangled particles (9Be+ ions): these correlations violate a form of Bell's inequality. Our measured value of the appropriate Bell's 'signal' is 2.25 +/- 0.03, whereas a value of 2 is the maximum allowed by local realistic theories of nature. In contrast to previous measurements with massive particles, this violation of Bell's inequality was obtained by use of a complete set of measurements. Moreover, the high detection efficiency of our apparatus eliminates the so-called 'detection' loophole.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/35057215

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The detection loophole was first closed in an ion-trap experiment by Rowe et al. (2001) utilizing the nearly perfect detection efficiency of fluorescence detection of single ions.

    “It was first closed in an ion-trap experiment by Rowe et al. (2001) utilizing the nearly perfect detection efficiency of fluorescence detection of single ions.”

    From Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry (2012) · cites this paper as Rowe et al. (2001)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rowe, M. A., Kielpinski, D., Meyer, V., Sackett, C. A., Itano, W. M., Monroe, C., & Wineland, D. J.
Affiliations
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Rowe, M. A.
Venue
Nature
Published
2001-02-15
Volume
409
Issue
6822
Pages
791-794
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1986718451
Cited by
1,043
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 71 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 54 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 62 · 2012: 70
FWCI
29.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
  • Nature
Funders
  • National Security Agency
  • Agricultural Research Development Agency
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology
  • Office of Naval Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Mechanical and Optical Resonators
Keywords
Bell inequality violation, local realism, ion trap, detection loophole, quantum nonlocality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review