The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Experimental Demonstration of a Nondestructive Controlled-NOT Quantum Gate for Two Independent Photon Qubits
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
None of the previously demonstrated quantum logic gates inspired by the KLM approach used the original KLM proposal of a simple measurement-induced nonlinearity.
“While a number of quantum logic gates inspired by the KLM approach have been demonstrated [17-24], none of these gates used the original KLM proposal of a simple measurement induced nonlinearity: either the gates are not heralded (the resultant output photons themselves have to be measured and destroyed) or rely on additional entanglement effects”
From Realization of a Knill-Laflamme-Milburn controlled-NOT photonic quantum circuit combining effective optical nonlinearities (2011) · cites this paper as [21]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels
Bennett, C. H., Brassard, G., Crépeau, C., Jozsa, R., Peres, A., & Wootters, W. K. (1993) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.70.1895 · Cited by 13,703
Gisin, N., Ribordy, G., Tittel, W., & Zbinden, H. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.145 · Cited by 8,515
Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer
Shor, P. W. (1997) · SIAM Journal on Computing · doi:10.1137/s0097539795293172 · Cited by 8,472
A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics
Knill, E., Laflamme, R., & Milburn, G. J. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35051009 · Cited by 5,880
Experimental quantum teleportation
Bouwmeester, D., Pan, J.-W., Mattle, K., Eibl, M., Weinfurter, H., & Zeilinger, A. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/37539 · Cited by 5,545
Self-citationNew High-Intensity Source of Polarization-Entangled Photon Pairs
Kwiat, P. G., Mattle, K., Weinfurter, H., Zeilinger, A., Sergienko, A. V., & Shih, Y. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.75.4337 · Cited by 3,102
Gottesman, D., & Chuang, I. L. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/46503 · Cited by 1,860
Demonstration of an all-optical quantum controlled-NOT gate
O'Brien, J. L., Pryde, G. J., White, A. G., Ralph, T. C., & Branning, D. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02054 · Cited by 992
Experimental controlled-NOT logic gate for single photons in the coincidence basis
Pittman, T. B., Fitch, M. J., Jacobs, B. C., & Franson, J. D. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.68.032316 · Cited by 328
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2881 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature01494 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature01492 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.5166 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.63.030301 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.062311 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.012314 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.040503 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.257902 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.040301 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.4083 · DOI
- M. Zukowski, 1995, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 755, 91, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1995.tb38959.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.1345 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.4435 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.1370 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits
Kok, P., Munro, W. J., Nemoto, K., Ralph, T. C., Dowling, J. P., & Milburn, G. J. (2007) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.135 · Cited by 2,904
Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry
Pan, J.-W., Chen, Z.-B., Lu, C.-Y., Weinfurter, H., Zeilinger, A., & Żukowski, M. (2012) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.84.777 · Cited by 1,410
“Complete Bell-state measurement was realized for ions (Riebe et al., 2004; Barrett et al., 2004), and for photons (Kim, Kulik, and Shih, 2001) using nonlinearity and can also be performed prababilistically with linear optics, as realized by Zhao et al. (2005b), and by Walther and Zeilinger (2005).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationAspuru-Guzik, A., & Walther, P. (2012) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys2253 · Cited by 952
Demonstration of a Simple Entangling Optical Gate and Its Use in Bell-State Analysis
Langford, N. K., Weinhold, T. J., Prevedel, R., Resch, K. J., Gilchrist, A., O’Brien, J. L., Pryde, G. J., & White, A. G. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.210504 · Cited by 262
Demonstration of an Optical Quantum Controlled-NOT Gate without Path Interference
Okamoto, R., Hofmann, H. F., Takeuchi, S., & Sasaki, K. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.210506 · Cited by 251
Ralph, T. C., Hayes, A. J. F., & Gilchrist, A. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.100501 · Cited by 172
Noise Thresholds for Optical Quantum Computers
Dawson, C. M., Haselgrove, H. L., & Nielsen, M. A. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.020501 · Cited by 127
Integrated-optics heralded controlled-NOT gate for polarization-encoded qubits
Zeuner, J., Sharma, A. N., Tillmann, M., Heilmann, R., Gräfe, M., Moqanaki, A., Szameit, A., & Walther, P. (2018) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-018-0068-0 · Cited by 95
Okamoto, R., O’Brien, J. L., Hofmann, H. F., & Takeuchi, S. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1018839108 · Cited by 92
Noise thresholds for optical cluster-state quantum computation
Dawson, C. M., Haselgrove, H. L., & Nielsen, M. A. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.73.052306 · Cited by 79
High-fidelityZ-measurement error encoding of optical qubits
O’Brien, J. L., Pryde, G. J., White, A. G., & Ralph, T. C. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.060303 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, Z., Zhang, A.-N., Chen, Y.-A., Zhang, H., Du, J.-F., Yang, T., & Pan, J.-W.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2005-01-25
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 0031-9007
- 1079-7114
- Cited by
- 141
- References
- 9
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
