The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measurement of Quantum Weak Values of Photon Polarization
Open accessAbstract
We experimentally determine weak values for a single photon's polarization, obtained via a weak measurement that employs a two-photon entangling operation, and postselection. The weak values cannot be explained by a semiclassical wave theory, due to the two-photon entanglement. We observe the variation in the size of the weak value with measurement strength, obtaining an average measurement of the S1 Stokes parameter more than an order of magnitude outside of the operator's spectrum for the smallest measurement strengths.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information
Nielsen, M. A., Chuang, I., & Grover, L. K. (2002) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1463744 · Cited by 21,895
Demonstration of an all-optical quantum controlled-NOT gate
O'Brien, J. L., Pryde, G. J., White, A. G., Ralph, T. C., & Branning, D. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02054 · Cited by 992
Self-citationQuantum Process Tomography of a Controlled-NOT Gate
O'Brien, J. L., Pryde, G. J., Gilchrist, A., James, D. F. V., Langford, N. K., Ralph, T. C., & White, A. G. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.080502 · Cited by 499
Self-citationOptical Telecom Networks as Weak Quantum Measurements with Postselection
Brunner, N., Acín, A., Collins, D., Gisin, N., & Scarani, V. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.180402 · Cited by 86
Cited by
Colloquium: Understanding quantum weak values: Basics and applications
Dressel, J., Malik, M., Miatto, F. M., Jordan, A. N., & Boyd, R. W. (2014) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.86.307 · Cited by 698
Experimental observation of the spin Hall effect of light on a nanometal film via weak measurements
Zhou, X., Xiao, Z., Luo, H., & Wen, S. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.85.043809 · Cited by 310
Procedure for Direct Measurement of General Quantum States Using Weak Measurement
Lundeen, J. S., & Bamber, C. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.070402 · Cited by 281
Weak Values and the Leggett-Garg Inequality in Solid-State Qubits
Williams, N. S., & Jordan, A. N. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.026804 · Cited by 265
Full characterization of polarization states of light via direct measurement
Salvail, J. Z., Agnew, M., Johnson, A. S., Bolduc, E., Leach, J., & Boyd, R. W. (2013) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2013.24 · Cited by 196
Metadata
- Authors
- Pryde, G. J., O’Brien, J. L., White, A. G., Ralph, T. C., & Wiseman, H. M.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2005-06-09
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 220405-220405
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2111051692
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 5.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measurement of Quantum Weak Values of Photon Polarization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.94.220405
- The paper
- Pryde, G. J., O’Brien, J. L., White, A. G., Ralph, T. C., & Wiseman, H. M. (2005). Measurement of Quantum Weak Values of Photon Polarization. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.94.220405
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
