Cited by 134Quantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum Information and CryptographyNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories

All-Versus-Nothing Violation of Local Realism by Two-Photon, Four-Dimensional Entanglement

Open access
Yang, Tao, Zhang, Qiang, Zhang, Jun, Yin, Juan, Zhao, Zhi, Żukowski, Marek, Chen, Zeng-Bing, Pan, Jian-Wei·2005·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We develop and exploit a source of two-photon, four-dimensional entanglement to report the first two-particle all-versus-nothing test of local realism with a linear optics setup, but without resorting to a noncontextuality assumption. Our experimental results are in good agreement with quantum mechanics while in extreme contradiction to local realism. Potential applications of our experiment are briefly discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.95.240406

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This polarization-path entanglement was independently realized by Barbieri et al. (2005) using type-I nonlinear crystals, and by Yang et al. (2005) using a type-II nonlinear crystal.

    “It was independently realized by Barbieri et al (2005) using type-I nonlinear crystals, and by Yang et al (2005) using a type-II nonlinear crystal.”

    From Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry (2012) · cites this paper as Yang et al (2005)

  • Experimental demonstrations of the two-photon hyper-entanglement protocol were done by Yang et al. 2005 and Cinelli et al. (2005).

    “Experimental demonstrations of such a protocol were done by Yang et al. 2005 andCinelli et al. (2005) 45 using a two-photon hyper-entangled state in Eq. ( 40) (for hyperentanglement see section IV.B.2).”

    From Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry (2012) · cites this paper as Yang et al. 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, T., Zhang, Q., Zhang, J., Yin, J., Zhao, Z., Żukowski, M., Chen, Z.-B., & Pan, J.-W.
Affiliations
  • University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • University of Gdańsk (PL)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2005-12-09
Volume
95
Issue
24
Pages
240406-240406
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2003382933
Cited by
134
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Keywords
local realism, two-photon entanglement, linear optics, noncontextuality, Bell nonlocality, quantum foundations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review