Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 348

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Long-Distance Decoy-State Quantum Key Distribution in Optical Fiber

Open access
Rosenberg, Danna, Harrington, Jim W., Rice, Patrick R., Hiskett, Philip A., Peterson, Charles G., Hughes, Richard J., Lita, Adriana E., Nam, Sae Woo, Nordholt, Jane E.·2007·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

The theoretical existence of photon-number-splitting attacks creates a security loophole for most quantum key distribution (QKD) demonstrations that use a highly attenuated laser source. Using ultralow-noise, high-efficiency transition-edge sensor photodetectors, we have implemented the first version of a decoy-state protocol that incorporates finite statistics without the use of Gaussian approximations in a one-way QKD system, enabling the creation of secure keys immune to photon-number-splitting attacks and highly resistant to Trojan horse attacks over 107 km of optical fiber.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.98.010503

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. 10.1007/BF00191318 · DOI · Paper page
  2. C. H. Bennett, 1984, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems, and Signal Processing
  3. G. Brassard, 1994, Proceedings of EUROCRYPT ’93, Lofthus, Norway
  4. 10.1109/18.476316 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.1330 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1103/PhysRevA.61.052304 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1049/el:20045038 · DOI
  8. 10.1088/1367-2630/8/9/193 · DOI
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.057901 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.230504 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.230503 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.070502 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.012326 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1103/PhysRevA.73.022320 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1063/1.113674 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1103/PhysRevA.71.061803 · DOI · Paper page
  17. R. J. Hughes, 2005, Proc. SPIE-Int. Soc. Opt. Eng., 5893, 1
  18. 10.1063/1.2164307 · DOI
  19. T. Sugimoto, 2000, IEICE Trans. Fundamentals, E83-A, 1987
  20. H. Krawczyk, 1994, Proceedings of Crypto ’93, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
  21. D. Gottesman, 2004, Quantum Inf. Comput., 4, 325, 10.26421/QIC4.5-1 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.010505 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 348

Metadata

Authors
Rosenberg, D., Harrington, J. W., Rice, P. R., Hiskett, P. A., Peterson, C. G., Hughes, R. J., Lita, A. E., Nam, S. W., & Nordholt, J. E.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2007-01-05
Volume
98
Issue
1
Pages
010503-010503
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W1998921964
Cited by
348
References
2
FWCI
34.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-Distance Decoy-State Quantum Key Distribution in Optical Fiber. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.98.010503
The paper
Rosenberg, D., Harrington, J. W., Rice, P. R., Hiskett, P. A., Peterson, C. G., Hughes, R. J., Lita, A. E., Nam, S. W., & Nordholt, J. E. (2007). Long-Distance Decoy-State Quantum Key Distribution in Optical Fiber. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.98.010503

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.