Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,572

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Steering, Entanglement, Nonlocality, and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox

Open access
Wiseman, H. M., Jones, S. J., Doherty, A. C.·2007·Physical Review Letters
DOI 10.1103/physrevlett.98.140402
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The concept of steering was introduced by Schrödinger in 1935 as a generalization of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox for arbitrary pure bipartite entangled states and arbitrary measurements by one party. Until now, it has never been rigorously defined, so it has not been known (for example) what mixed states are steerable (that is, can be used to exhibit steering). We provide an operational definition, from which we prove (by considering Werner states and isotropic states) that steerable states are a strict subset of the entangled states, and a strict superset of the states that can exhibit Bell nonlocality. For arbitrary bipartite Gaussian states we derive a linear matrix inequality that decides the question of steerability via Gaussian measurements, and we relate this to the original Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.98.140402

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. E. Schrödinger, 1935, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc., 31, 553, 10.1017/S0305004100013554 · DOI · Paper page
  2. E. Schrödinger, 1936, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc., 32, 446, 10.1017/S0305004100019137 · DOI · Paper page
  3. E. Schrödinger, 1926, Ann. Phys. (Berlin), 79, 361, 10.1002/andp.19263840404 · DOI · Paper page
  4. E. Schrodinger, 1926, Ann. Phys. (Berlin), 79, 489, 10.1002/andp.19263840602 · DOI · Paper page
  5. E. Schrodinger, 1926, Ann. Phys. (Berlin), 80, 437, 10.1002/andp.19263851302 · DOI · Paper page
  6. E. Schrodinger, 1926, Ann. Phys. (Berlin), 81, 109, 10.1002/andp.19263861802 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1088/0305-4470/21/13/016 · doi:10.1088/0305-4470/21/13/016
  8. 10.1023/A:1026056716397 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.032110 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1007/s10702-006-1852-1 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/0375-9601(91)90805-I · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.5239 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1103/PhysRevA.40.913 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1088/0305-4470/34/1/307 · DOI
  15. 10.1103/PhysRevA.73.062105 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1103/PhysRevA.59.4206 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.040404 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.032316 · DOI · Paper page
  19. K. Zhou, 1996, Optimal and Robust Control
  20. 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.012304 · DOI
  21. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.127901 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.150501 · DOI

Cited by

See all 1,572

Metadata

Authors
Wiseman, H. M., Jones, S. J., & Doherty, A. C.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Published
2007-04-06
Volume
98
Issue
14
Pages
140402-140402
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.98.140402
OpenAlex
W2068343535
Cited by
1,572
References
4
FWCI
6.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Licence
link.aps.org/licenses/aps-default-license (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Steering, Entanglement, Nonlocality, and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.98.140402
The paper
Wiseman, H. M., Jones, S. J., & Doherty, A. C. (2007). Steering, Entanglement, Nonlocality, and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.98.140402

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.