Cited by 360Semiconductor Quantum Structures and DevicesStrong Light-Matter InteractionsQuantum optics and atomic interactions

Resonance Fluorescence from a Coherently Driven Semiconductor Quantum Dot in a Cavity

Open access
Muller, A., Flagg, E. B., Bianucci, P., Wang, X. Y., Deppe, D. G., Ma, W., Zhang, J., Salamo, G. J. +2 more·2007·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We show that resonance fluorescence, i.e., the resonant emission of a coherently driven two-level system, can be realized with a semiconductor quantum dot. The dot is embedded in a planar optical microcavity and excited in a waveguide mode so as to discriminate its emission from residual laser scattering. The transition from the weak to the strong excitation regime is characterized by the emergence of oscillations in the first-order correlation function of the fluorescence, g(tau), as measured by interferometry. The measurements correspond to a Mollow triplet with a Rabi splitting of up to 13.3 microeV. Second-order correlation measurements further confirm nonclassical light emission.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.99.187402

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [19]D. Fattal, R. Beausoleil, and Y. Yamamoto, Arxiv preprint quant-ph/0606204 (2006). · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Muller, A., Flagg, E. B., Bianucci, P., Wang, X. Y., Deppe, D. G., Ma, W., Zhang, J., Salamo, G. J., Xiao, M., & Shih, C. K.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • University of Central Florida (US)
  • University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2007-11-01
Volume
99
Issue
18
Pages
187402-187402
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2032389904
Cited by
360
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 26
FWCI
10.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Strong Light-Matter Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
Keywords
resonance fluorescence, semiconductor quantum dots, optical microcavities, cavity quantum electrodynamics, coherent driving, two-level system, Mollow triplet, Rabi splitting, waveguide modes, first-order correlation function, second-order correlation function, nonclassical light

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review