Theory of Control of the Spin-Photon Interface for Quantum Networks
Open accessAbstract
A cavity coupling, a charged nanodot, and a fiber can act as a quantum interface, through which a stationary spin qubit and a flying photon qubit can be interconverted via a cavity-assisted Raman process. This Raman process can be made to generate or annihilate an arbitrarily shaped single-photon wave packet by pulse shaping the controlling laser field. This quantum interface forms the basis for many essential functions of a quantum network, including sending, receiving, transferring, swapping, and entangling qubits at distributed quantum nodes as well as a deterministic source and an efficient detector of a single-photon wave packet with arbitrarily specified shape and average photon number. Numerical study of errors from noise and system parameters on the operations shows high fidelity and robust tolerance.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Quantum dots are attractive solid-state devices because they can be embedded in high-quality nanostructure cavities and waveguides to generate ultra-bright sources of single and entangled photons, provide a light-matter interface, and can in principle be scaled to large quantum networks.
“Among different types of single-photon emitters [6,7], quantum dots (QDs) are attractive solid-state devices since they can be embedded in high-quality nanostructure cavities and waveguides to generate ultra-bright sources of single and entangled photons [7][8][9][10].QDs also provide a light-matter interface [11][12][13] and can in principle be scaled to large quantum networks [14].”
From On-demand semiconductor single-photon source with near-unity indistinguishability (2013) · cites this paper as [14]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Quantum computation with quantum dots
Loss, D., & DiVincenzo, D. P. (1998) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.57.120 · Cited by 6,840 · see citing works
Vahala, K. J. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01939 · Cited by 4,878 · see citing works
Quantum Computations with Cold Trapped Ions
Cirac, J. I., & Zoller, P. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.74.4091 · Cited by 3,733 · see citing works
High-Q photonic nanocavity in a two-dimensional photonic crystal
Akahane, Y., Asano, T., Song, B.-S., & Noda, S. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02063 · Cited by 2,741 · see citing works
Vacuum Rabi splitting with a single quantum dot in a photonic crystal nanocavity
Yoshie, T., Scherer, A., Hendrickson, J., Khitrova, G., Gibbs, H. M., Rupper, G., Ell, C., Shchekin, O. B., & DEPPE, D. G. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03119 · Cited by 2,255 · see citing works
Quantum State Transfer and Entanglement Distribution among Distant Nodes in a Quantum Network
Cirac, J. I., Zoller, P., Kimble, H. J., & Mabuchi, H. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.3221 · Cited by 2,215 · see citing works
Strong coupling in a single quantum dot–semiconductor microcavity system
Reithmaier, J. P., Sek, G., Löffler, A., Hofmann, C., Kuhn, S., Reitzenstein, S., Keldysh, L. V., Kulakovskiĭ, V. D., Reinecke, T. L., & Forchel, A. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02969 · Cited by 2,063 · see citing works
Quantum Information Processing Using Quantum Dot Spins and Cavity QED
Imamog¯lu, A., Awschalom, D. D., Burkard, G., DiVincenzo, D. P., Loss, D., Sherwin, M., & Small, A. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.4204 · Cited by 1,995 · see citing works
Demonstration of a Fundamental Quantum Logic Gate
Monroe, C., Meekhof, D. M., King, B. E., Itano, W. M., & Wineland, D. J. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.75.4714 · Cited by 1,586 · see citing works
Whither the Future of Controlling Quantum Phenomena?
RABITZ, H. A., de Vivie‐Riedle, R., Motzkus, M., & Kompa, K. L. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.288.5467.824 · Cited by 1,150 · see citing works
An All-Optical Quantum Gate in a Semiconductor Quantum Dot
Li, X., Wu, Y., Steel, D. G., Gammon, D., Stievater, T. H., Katzer, D. S., Park, D., Piermarocchi, C., & Sham, L. J. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1083800 · Cited by 899 · see citing works
Self-citationObservation of entanglement between a single trapped atom and a single photon
Blinov, B. B., Moehring, D. L., Duan, L., & Monroe, C. R. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02377 · Cited by 660 · see citing works
Distributed quantum computation over noisy channels
Cirac, J. I., EKERT, A. K., Huelga, S. F., & Macchiavello, C. (1999) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.59.4249 · Cited by 656 · see citing works
Quantum theory of optical feedback via homodyne detection
Wiseman, H. M., & Milburn, G. J. (1993) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.70.548 · Cited by 630 · see citing works
Continuous generation of single photons with controlled waveform in an ion-trap cavity system
Keller, M., Lange, B., Hayasaka, K., Lange, W., & WALTHER, H. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02961 · Cited by 629 · see citing works
Bayer, M., & Forchel, A. (2002) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.65.041308 · Cited by 450 · see citing works
Cavity QED and quantum-information processing with “hot” trapped atoms
Duan, L.-M., Kuzmich, A., & Kimble, H. J. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.67.032305 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Theory of quantum optical control of a single spin in a quantum dot
Chen, P., Piermarocchi, C., Sham, L. J., Gammon, D., & Steel, D. G. (2004) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.69.075320 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Self-citationOptical RKKY Interaction between Charged Semiconductor Quantum Dots
Piermarocchi, C., Chen, P., Sham, L. J., & Steel, D. G. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.167402 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Self-citationPhotonic crystals for confining, guiding, and emitting light
Scherer, A., Painter, O. J., Vučković, J., et al. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology · doi:10.1109/tnano.2002.1005421 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Fan, X., Palinginis, P., Lacey, S., et al. (2000) · Optics Letters · doi:10.1364/ol.25.001600 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Nanodot-Cavity Electrodynamics and Photon Entanglement
Yao, W., Liu, R., & Sham, L. J. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.92.217402 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Physical Implementation of Quantum Computation
DiVincenzo, D. P. (2000) · Fortschritte der Physik · doi:10.1002/1521-3978(200009)48:9/11
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [14]A. Scherer, O. Painter, J. Vuckovic, M. Loncar, and T. Yoshie, IEEE Transcations on Nanotechonology 1 , 4 (2002).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ladd, T. D., Jelezko, F., Laflamme, R., Nakamura, Y., Monroe, C., & O’Brien, J. L. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08812 · Cited by 3,592 · see citing works
On-demand semiconductor single-photon source with near-unity indistinguishability
He, Y.-M., He, Y., Wei, Y.-J., Wu, D., Atatüre, M., Schneider, C., Höfling, S., Kamp, M., Lu, C.-Y., & Pan, J.-W. (2013) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2012.262 · Cited by 559 · see citing works
Resonance Fluorescence from a Coherently Driven Semiconductor Quantum Dot in a Cavity
Muller, A., Flagg, E. B., Bianucci, P., Wang, X. Y., Deppe, D. G., Ma, W., Zhang, J., Salamo, G. J., Xiao, M., & Shih, C. K. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.187402 · Cited by 360 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yao, W., Liu, R.-B., & Sham, L. J.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2005-07-13
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 030504-030504
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2040161854
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 17.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
- Keywords
- spin-photon interface, quantum interface, spin qubits, single-photon wave packets, pulse shaping, quantum networks, quantum memory, nanodots, fiber coupling, qubit entanglement, quantum state transfer, noise immunity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
