The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 8 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Biased Bilayer Graphene: Semiconductor with a Gap Tunable by the Electric Field Effect
Open accessAbstract
We demonstrate that the electronic gap of a graphene bilayer can be controlled externally by applying a gate bias. From the magnetotransport data (Shubnikov-de Haas measurements of the cyclotron mass), and using a tight-binding model, we extract the value of the gap as a function of the electronic density. We show that the gap can be changed from zero to midinfrared energies by using fields of less, approximately < 1 V/nm, below the electric breakdown of SiO2. The opening of a gap is clearly seen in the quantum Hall regime.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The paper reports that bilayer graphene can be converted into a semiconductor whose band gap is externally tunable by gate bias, with the gap ranging from zero to mid-infrared energies. Magnetotransport measurements and tight-binding modeling show clear gap signatures, including a zero Hall conductivity plateau and an asymmetric cyclotron mass.
Key findings
- In biased bilayer graphene, a plateau at zero Hall conductivity appears at the neutrality point, unlike the pristine case; the longitudinal resistivity at neutrality exceeded 150 kΩ at 4 K for the biased device, compared with 6 kΩ for the unbiased device under the same conditions.
- The cyclotron mass depends asymmetrically on carrier density, and comparison with tight-binding theory yields an interlayer hopping parameter of 0.22 eV and indicates gaps larger than 0.2 eV.
- A small-bias linear fit to the screened theory gives a gap of about 1.2 meV per volt relative to a gate voltage of 25 V, while the theory predicts gap saturation at the interlayer hopping scale.
- The model agrees well with angle-resolved photoemission data, except in the gap saturation regime around densities of about 50 × 10¹² cm⁻².
Methods
- Bilayer graphene devices were prepared by micromechanical cleavage on 300 nm SiO₂ and patterned into Hall bars; carrier density was controlled by a Si backgate and by NH₃ chemical doping, with transport measured by lock-in techniques in fields up to 12 T and temperatures from 4 to 300 K.
- Shubnikov–de Haas oscillations were measured versus temperature and fitted to extract the cyclotron mass as a function of carrier density.
- The data were interpreted with a Bernal-stacked bilayer tight-binding model using in-plane hopping of 3.1 eV and interlayer hopping of 0.22 eV, including a self-consistent Hartree treatment of screening; Hall conductivity was modeled for a zigzag-edged ribbon in a magnetic field.
Limitations
- The paper states that the Hartree approach is reliable only when the gap is small compared with the interlayer hopping; for hole doping it underestimates the cyclotron mass while the unscreened model overestimates it, so the true gap lies between these limits and a better screening treatment is needed when the electrostatic energy becomes comparable to the interlayer hopping.
- The paper notes that the comparison with angle-resolved photoemission data works well except in the gap saturation regime at high density.
- Evident from the text: for the transport devices, the gap values are inferred by fitting a tight-binding/Hartree model to magnetotransport rather than measured directly by a spectroscopic probe.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 8 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The opening of a gap is clearly seen in the quantum Hall regime.”
§ Biased Bilayer Graphene: Semiconductor with a Gap Tunable by the Electric Field Effect > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“which is absent in the unbiased case”
§ Biased Bilayer Graphene: Semiconductor with a Gap Tunable by the Electric Field Effect > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“by comparing the observed behavior with our tightbinding results, we show that the gap can be tuned to values larger than 0.2 eV”
§ Biased Bilayer Graphene: Semiconductor with a Gap Tunable by the Electric Field Effect > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“in the biased device, xx at n 0 exceeded 150 kOhm at 4 K, as compared to 6 kOhm for the unbiased case under the same conditions”
§ Biased Bilayer Graphene: Semiconductor with a Gap Tunable by the Electric Field Effect > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“in a magnetic field, a pronounced plateau at zero Hall conductivity xy 0 is found for the biased bilayer”
§ Biased Bilayer Graphene: Semiconductor with a Gap Tunable by the Electric Field Effect > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the cyclotron mass, m c , in the bilayer biased by chemical doping is an asymmetric function of carrier density, n”
§ Biased Bilayer Graphene: Semiconductor with a Gap Tunable by the Electric Field Effect > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The linear increase of m c with jnj and the pronounced asymmetry between hole-and electron-doping of the biased bilayer are clearly seen here.”
§ Biased Bilayer Graphene: Semiconductor with a Gap Tunable by the Electric Field Effect > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We show that the gap can be changed from zero to midinfrared energies by using fields of & 1 V=nm, below the electric breakdown of SiO 2 .”
§ Biased Bilayer Graphene: Semiconductor with a Gap Tunable by the Electric Field Effect > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: The breakdown field for SiO2 is 1 V/nm (i.e., 300 V for the used oxide thickness).
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The linear increase of m c with jnj and the pronounced asymmetry between hole-and electron-doping of the biased bilayer are clearly seen here.”
§ Biased Bilayer Graphene: Semiconductor with a Gap Tunable by the Electric Field Effect > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The energy gap is revealed by the appearance of the N 0 plateau at xy 0 [see the curve labeled ''doped'' in Fig. 1(a)].”
§ Biased Bilayer Graphene: Semiconductor with a Gap Tunable by the Electric Field Effect > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 10
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
- Probably not a substantial claim. 1
In the paper
“The N 0 plateau is strikingly absent, so that a double step of 8e 2 =h in height occurs at n 0, indicating a metallic state at the neutrality point [3].”
§ Biased Bilayer Graphene: Semiconductor with a Gap Tunable by the Electric Field Effect > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [3] 3. K. S. Novoselov et al., Nature Phys. 2, 177 (2006).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this case two flat bands with energies ÿeV=2 and eV=2 appear, similar to the case of zero magnetic field.The other two zero energy bands become dispersive inside the gap, showing the band-crossing phenomenon.”
§ Biased Bilayer Graphene: Semiconductor with a Gap Tunable by the Electric Field Effect > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the hole doping region in Fig. 1(b), the Hartree approach underestimates the value of m c whereas the simple unscreened result overestimates it.”
§ Biased Bilayer Graphene: Semiconductor with a Gap Tunable by the Electric Field Effect > Abstract
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The emerged plateau was accompanied by a huge peak in longitudinal resistivity xx , indicating an insulating state”
§ Biased Bilayer Graphene: Semiconductor with a Gap Tunable by the Electric Field Effect > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“which provides a clear signature of a gap and allows its estimate”
§ Biased Bilayer Graphene: Semiconductor with a Gap Tunable by the Electric Field Effect > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“we have cross-checked our theory against angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) data [8] and found excellent agreement.”
§ Biased Bilayer Graphene: Semiconductor with a Gap Tunable by the Electric Field Effect > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [8] 8. Theory of the gap opening within the continuum model was previously given by E. McCann, Phys. Rev. B 74, 161403 (2006).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Zero potential difference and zero gap are expected at n 2n 0 in both unscreened and screened cases, as seen from Eqs. (1) and ( 2) and the fact that nn; 0 0.”
§ Biased Bilayer Graphene: Semiconductor with a Gap Tunable by the Electric Field Effect > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The charge in layers 1 and 2 of the bilayer is equal to -ne/2.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Note that at the zero Hall plateau the current carried around the ribbon loop is zero, I 0, which implies, from the theory view point, a diverging longitudinal resistivity at low T”
§ Biased Bilayer Graphene: Semiconductor with a Gap Tunable by the Electric Field Effect > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This opens a gap of eV in size.”
§ Biased Bilayer Graphene: Semiconductor with a Gap Tunable by the Electric Field Effect > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At this particular density the gap closes and the theoretical value becomes independent of the screening assumptions.”
§ Biased Bilayer Graphene: Semiconductor with a Gap Tunable by the Electric Field Effect > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“a more accurate treatment of screening is needed when eV becomes of the order of t ? .”
§ Biased Bilayer Graphene: Semiconductor with a Gap Tunable by the Electric Field Effect > Abstract
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The coefficient 7:2 10 10 cm ÿ2 =V is determined by the geometry of the resulting capacitor and is in agreement with the values of n 1 found experimentally [1][2][3].”
§ Biased Bilayer Graphene: Semiconductor with a Gap Tunable by the Electric Field Effect > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [1][2][3]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The authors state this as an assumption.
The charge in layers 1 and 2 of the bilayer is equal to -ne/2.
“Assuming equal charge ÿne=2 in layers 1 and 2 of the bilayer”
The paper relies on this without support.
The breakdown field for SiO2 is 1 V/nm (i.e., 300 V for the used oxide thickness).
“Note that the breakdown field for SiO 2 is 1 V=nm (i.e., 300 V for the used oxide thickness)”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The electric field induced between the two layers can be considered as a result of the effect of charged surfaces placed above and below bilayer graphene.
“The electric field induced between the two layers can be considered as a result of the effect of charged surfaces placed above and below bilayer graphene .”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Laughlin is cited under the wrong reference number
MinorThe text attributes an argument to Laughlin [14], while the reference list assigns 14 to a note and lists Laughlin at 15.
“As pointed out by Laughlin [14], changing the magnetic flux through the ribbon loop by a flux quantum causes the states to move rigidly towards one edge.”
“14. The unbiased case, in the continuum approximation, was studied in Ref. [5]. 15. R. B. Laughlin, Phys. Rev. B 23, 5632 (1981).”
Citations
Cites
Electric Field Effect in Atomically Thin Carbon Films
Novoselov, K. S., Geim, A. K., Morozov, S. V., Jiang, D., Zhang, Y., Dubonos, S. V., Grigorieva, I. V., & Firsov, A. A. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1102896 · Cited by 66,834
Self-citationGeim, A. K., & Novoselov, K. S. (2007) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat1849 · Cited by 39,979
Self-citationTwo-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene
Novoselov, K. S., Geim, A. K., Morozov, S. V., Jiang, D., Katsnelson, M. I., Grigorieva, I. V., Dubonos, S. V., & Firsov, A. A. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04233 · Cited by 21,611
Self-citationExperimental observation of the quantum Hall effect and Berry's phase in graphene
Zhang, Y., Tan, Y.-W., Stormer, H. L., & Kim, P. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04235 · Cited by 13,435
Detection of individual gas molecules adsorbed on graphene
Schedin, F., Geim, A. K., Morozov, S. V., Hill, E. W., Blake, P., Katsnelson, M. I., & Novoselov, K. S. (2007) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat1967 · Cited by 8,028
Self-citationControlling the Electronic Structure of Bilayer Graphene
Ohta, T., Bostwick, A., Seyller, T. K., Horn, K., & Rotenberg, E. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1130681 · Cited by 3,346
Halperin, B. I. (1982) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.25.2185 · Cited by 2,547
Quantized Hall conductivity in two dimensions
Laughlin, R. B. (1981) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.23.5632 · Cited by 2,162
Landau-Level Degeneracy and Quantum Hall Effect in a Graphite Bilayer
McCann, E., & Fal’ko, V. I. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.086805 · Cited by 2,060
Unconventional quantum Hall effect and Berry’s phase of 2π in bilayer graphene
Novoselov, K. S., McCann, E., Morozov, S. V., Fal’ko, V. I., Katsnelson, M. I., Zeitler, U., Jiang, D., Schedin, F., & Geim, A. K. (2006) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys245 · Cited by 1,967
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,401–1,500 of 2,039
The mass effects on two-dimensional relativistic fermions
Li, M., Lee, S., & Kang, T. W. (2008) · Current Applied Physics · doi:10.1016/j.cap.2008.07.012 · Cited by 5
Tunable nonlinear excitonic optical response in biased bilayer graphene
Quintela, M. F. C. M., Peres, N. M. R., & Pedersen, T. G. (2024) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.110.085433 · Cited by 6
“Furthermore, the presence of various non–zero tensor components which include non–diagonal components also provides a greater freedom when experimentally probing the optical response of BBG. structures[33–38], especially when an interlayer twist angle is introduced[39–43].”
BackgroundSelf-citationThreshold voltage roll-off modelling of bilayer graphene field-effect transistors
Saeidmanesh, M., Ismail, R., Khaledian, M., et al. (2013) · Semiconductor Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/0268-1242/28/12/125020 · Cited by 5
“Moreover, the potential difference can be realized by applying different voltages to the top and back gates in double-gate MOSFETs, which means the band-gap can be controlled by gate bias [11].”
BackgroundEffect of impurity doping in gapped bilayer graphene
Han, Q., Yan, B., Jia, Z., Niu, J., Yu, D., & Wu, X. (2015) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.4934489 · Cited by 5
Gate-Tunable Landau Level Filling and Spectroscopy in Coupled Massive and Massless Electron Systems
Cheng, B., Wu, Y., Wang, P., et al. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.026601 · Cited by 5
Electron transport of step-shaped graphene nanoribbon
Li, H., Li, H., Zheng, Y., et al. (2011) · Physica B Condensed Matter · doi:10.1016/j.physb.2011.01.034 · Cited by 5
Performance and Characterization of Two-Dimensional Material Graphene Conductivity—A Review
Nandee, R., Chowdhury, M. A., Ahmed, M. U., et al. (2019) · Materials Performance and Characterization · doi:10.1520/mpc20180144 · Cited by 5
Electron transmission through a stacking domain boundary in multilayer graphene
Nam, N. N. T., & Koshino, M. (2015) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.91.214113 · Cited by 5
Sun, H., Fang, L., Wang, Y., Chi, Y., & Liu, R. (2014) · IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Nanoscale Architectures (NANOARCH) · doi:10.1145/2770287.2770321 · Cited by 5
“In addition, several other work demonstrated that better transport control can be obtained by top gate in singlelayer graphene (SLG) or bilayer graphene (BLG) transistors compared to MLG transistors [7], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24].”
BackgroundEffect of weak impurities on conductivity of uniaxially strained graphene
Sagalianov, I. Y., Prylutskyy, Y. І., Radchenko, T. M., et al. (2017) · doi:10.1109/ysf.2017.8126607 · Cited by 5
“Calculated density of electronic states for pristine (defectfree) graphene (not shown here) coincides with well-known curves in the literature [2, 4, 10, 11].”
BackgroundFang, S.-C., Zheng, X.-J., Lin, H., et al. (2020) · Journal of Physics Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/1361-648x/abb685 · Cited by 5
Probing layer localization in twisted graphene bilayers via cyclotron resonance
Lu, C.-K., & Fertig, H. A. (2014) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.90.115436 · Cited by 5
Anisotropic RKKY interaction in doped magnetic ordered bilayer graphene
Soori, Y., & Rezania, H. (2020) · Physica E Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures · doi:10.1016/j.physe.2020.114458 · Cited by 5
Bandgap scaling in bilayer graphene antidot lattices
Petersen, R., & Pedersen, T. G. (2015) · Journal of Physics Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/27/22/225502 · Cited by 5
Lu, D., Xiao, Y., Yan, X., et al. (2011) · Chemical Physics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2011.09.032 · Cited by 5
Twist dependent magneto-optical response in twisted bilayer graphene
Zuber, J., & Zhang, C. (2021) · Journal of Physics Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/1361-648x/ac1c30 · Cited by 5
Designer fermion models in functionalized graphene bilayers
García-Martínez, N. A., & Fernández-Rossier, J. (2019) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.1.033173 · Cited by 5
Rut, G., & Rycerz, A. (2014) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.89.045421 · Cited by 5
Zhang, J., Xu, C., Guo, Z. X., et al. (2022) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/d2cp03060h · Cited by 5
Zitterbewegung in bilayer graphene: Effects of trigonal warping and electric field
Jung, E., Park, D., & Park, C.-S. (2013) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.87.115438 · Cited by 5
Ghazaryan, A. G., Matevosyan, H. H., & Sedrakian, K. V. (2020) · Journal of Nanophotonics · doi:10.1117/1.jnp.14.046009 · Cited by 5
Electric-field-induced rich magneto-absorption spectra of ABC-stacked trilayer graphene
Lin, Y.-P., Lin, C., Chang, C.-P., et al. (2015) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c5ra15045k · Cited by 5
Integrated Circuits/Microchips
Yeap, K. H., & Hoyos, J. J. S. (2020) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.83313 · Cited by 5
Anomalous ac electric field effect in bilayer graphene
Kleinert, P. (2009) · Physica B Condensed Matter · doi:10.1016/j.physb.2009.07.155 · Cited by 5
Layer-by-layer assembly of multilayer optical lattices: A theoretical proposal
Hao, L. (2021) · The European Physical Journal D · doi:10.1140/epjd/s10053-021-00161-0 · Cited by 5
Kühne, M. (2018) · Springer theses · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-02366-9_2 · Cited by 5
Ghazaryan, A. G. (2021) · Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1134/s1063776121050034 · Cited by 5
Horii, K., Nakasuga, T., Hirahara, T., Tajima, S., Ebisuoka, R., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T., & Yagi, R. (2019) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.100.245420 · Cited by 5
Spin-layer locked gapless states in gated bilayer graphene
Jaskólski, W., & Ayuela, A. (2019) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c9ra07319a · Cited by 5
The Synthesis, Properties, and Applications of Heteroatom-Doped Graphenes
Chang, Y., & Chiang, W. (2016) · Advanced structured materials · doi:10.1007/978-81-322-2668-0_3 · Cited by 5
Theory of Weak-Field Magnetoresistance in Bilayer Graphene
Ando, T. (2019) · Journal of the Physical Society of Japan · doi:10.7566/jpsj.88.044707 · Cited by 5
Yang, S., Liu, C.-S., Yu, S., et al. (2025) · Chinese Physics Letters · doi:10.1088/0256-307x/42/9/090705 · Cited by 5
Phase transition of polarons in bilayer graphene nanoribbons
Cassiano, T. D. S. A., Silva, G. M. E., & Neto, P. H. D. O. (2023) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/1402-4896/acecc2 · Cited by 5
Carrier density and light helicity dependence of photocurrent in mono- and bilayer graphene
Qian, X., Cao, B., Wang, Z., Shen, X., Soci, C., Eginligil, M., & Yu, T. (2018) · Semiconductor Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/1361-6641/aae2f1 · Cited by 5
Aysan, I. I., Görkan, T., Ozdemir, I., et al. (2020) · Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jmgm.2020.107726 · Cited by 5
First-principles theoretical investigation of graphene layers for sensor applications
Fujimoto, Y. (2017) · Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology · doi:10.1177/1847980417737645 · Cited by 5
“Among them, one of the most remarkable properties is that graphene shows extremely high charge mobility.(3) Furthermore, graphene as well as carbon nanotubes (CNTs) is also sensitive to adsorbates.”
BackgroundKhabthani, J. J., Missaoui, A., Mayou, D., et al. (2021) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.104.245125 · Cited by 4
Majidi, R. (2024) · Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing · doi:10.1016/j.mssp.2024.108542 · Cited by 4
Sub-MeV dark matter detection with bilayer graphene
Das, A., Jang, J., & Min, H. (2024) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.043020 · Cited by 4
“Most importantly, a tunable energy gap can be opened up to ∼ 300 meV between the valence and conduction bands by externally applying a gate voltage across the BLG surface [50, 59–62].”
BackgroundZhang, S., Li, C., Shang, J., et al. (2020) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/d0cp03141k · Cited by 4
Anomalous quantum oscillations in AA and AB bilayer graphene
Алисултанов, З. З., & Abdullaev, G. O. (2023) · Physica B Condensed Matter · doi:10.1016/j.physb.2023.414720 · Cited by 4
Li, Y. (2015) · Springer theses · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25376-3_6 · Cited by 4
Carbonous‐Based Optoelectronic Devices
Nasr, N., Shahzad, K., Ahmad, I., Dee, C. F., Bais, B. B., & Zhao, T. (2022) · doi:10.1002/9783527829682.ch5 · Cited by 4
Chemical vapor deposition (CVD) growth of graphene films
Drogowska-Horná, K., Frank, O., & Kalbáč, M. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-102848-3.00014-1 · Cited by 4
Erratum: Valley-based field-effect transistors in graphene [Phys. Rev. B86, 165411 (2012)]
Lue, N.-Y., Chen, Y.-C., & Wu, G. Y. (2013) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.87.039904 · Cited by 4
Na, M. Y., Lee, S., Kim, D. H., et al. (2015) · Han-guk hyeonmigyeong hakoeji/Applied microscopy · doi:10.9729/am.2015.45.1.23 · Cited by 4
“For example, bandgap opens with external perpendicular electric field in case of AB-stacked (Bernal) bilayer and ABC-stacked (rhombohedral) trilayer graphene, while ABA-stacked trilayer has no bandgap under same electric field (Castro et al., 2007; Zhang et al., 2009; Lui et al., 2011).”
BackgroundLazzús, J. A., Palma-Chilla, L., & Flores, J. C. (2025) · Physica B Condensed Matter · doi:10.1016/j.physb.2025.417998 · Cited by 4
Bio-Inspired Engineering of 3D Carbon Nanostructures
Kumar, R., Kim, H., & Oh, I. (2015) · Springer series in biomaterials science and engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-22861-7_12 · Cited by 4
Wafer-scale synthesis of two-dimensional ultrathin films
Singh, A. K., Thakurta, B., Giri, A., et al. (2023) · Chemical Communications · doi:10.1039/d3cc04610a · Cited by 4
Guan, Z., Li, J. Z., & Duan, W. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1510.09022 · Cited by 4
Thermoelectric properties of bilayer graphene structures with bandgap opening
Briones-Torres, J. A., Pérez-Álvarez, R., Molina-Valdovinos, S., et al. (2022) · Physica E Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures · doi:10.1016/j.physe.2022.115432 · Cited by 4
Observation of Band Gap in Epitaxial Bilayer Graphene Field Effect Transistors
Tanabe, S., Sekine, Y., Kageshima, H., Nagase, M., & Hibino, H. (2011) · Japanese Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.7567/jjap.50.04dn04 · Cited by 4
Semi-hydrogenated polyaniline sheet: A half-metal with exotic properties
Tagani, M. B. (2019) · Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.166027 · Cited by 4
Lam, K., & Liang, G. (2009) · International Workshop on Computational Electronics · doi:10.1109/iwce.2009.5091098 · Cited by 4
Bias free gap creation in bilayer graphene
Davenport, A. R., & Hague, J. P. (2014) · Journal of Physics Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/26/22/225601 · Cited by 4
“scale production outside our reach [8], but bilayer graphene may offer a solution [9, 10].”
BackgroundMinimal conductivity and signatures of quantum criticality in ballistic graphene bilayer
Rut, G., & Rycerz, A. (2014) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/107/47005 · Cited by 4
Graphene transistors — A new contender for future electronics
Schwierz, F. (2010) · IEEE International Conference on Solid-State and Integrated Circuit Technology · doi:10.1109/icsict.2010.5667602 · Cited by 4
Doping and band gap control at poly(vinylidene fluoride)/graphene interface
Cai, J. Y., Wang, J., Gao, H., et al. (2018) · Journal of Physics D Applied Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6463/aabb98 · Cited by 4
Sun, J.-H., Xu, D.-H., Zhou, Y., et al. (2014) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.90.125429 · Cited by 4
Dey, S., & Sensarma, R. (2016) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.235107 · Cited by 5
Stacking-Specific Reversible Oxidation of Bilayer Graphene
Park, B., Jeong, G., Lim, E., et al. (2021) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c04026 · Cited by 4
Stacking sensitive topological phases in a bilayer Kane-Mele-Hubbard model at quarter filling
Mishra, A., & Lee, S. (2019) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.100.045146 · Cited by 4
Carbon Based Nanoelectromechanical Resonators.
Wu, C. C. (2012) · Deep Blue (University of Michigan) · Cited by 4
Double-exponential current-voltage (I-V) behavior of bilayer graphene-based Schottky diode
Kutluoğlu, E. E., Orhan, E. O., Tataroğlu, A., et al. (2021) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/1402-4896/ac2af5 · Cited by 4
Xu, W., & Dong, H. (2011) · InTech eBooks · doi:10.5772/14328 · Cited by 4
“It has already been used to realize high-speed and high-frequency electronic devices such as field-effect transistors (Castro et al., 2007), p-n junctions (González & Perfetto, 2008), high-frequency devices (Lin et al.”
MethodDo, V. N., Le, H. A., & Vu, V. T. (2017) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.95.165130 · Cited by 4
Compression-induced crimping of boron nanotubes from borophenes: a DFT study
Qin, X., Liu, J., Mu, Y., et al. (2022) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/d2cp01824a · Cited by 4
Graphene: Synthesis and Functionalization
Terasawa, T., & Saiki, K. (2017) · Nanostructure science and technology · doi:10.1007/978-4-431-56496-6_4 · Cited by 4
Gap Opening in Graphene via Locally Introduced Electric Field
Abbasian, H. (2023) · physica status solidi (RRL) - Rapid Research Letters · doi:10.1002/pssr.202200302 · Cited by 4
Chegel, R., & Behzad, S. (2023) · Physica E Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures · doi:10.1016/j.physe.2023.115859 · Cited by 4
Bilayer graphene phonovoltaic-FET:In situphonon recycling
Melnick, C., & Kaviany, M. (2017) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.96.205444 · Cited by 4
Linear and third-order nonlinear optical properties of Germanene nanotubes
Chegel, R. (2024) · Physica E Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures · doi:10.1016/j.physe.2024.116171 · Cited by 4
Acharjee, S., Boruah, A., Devi, R., & Dutta, N. (2024) · Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0174626 · Cited by 5
Chiral states induced by symmetry breaking terms in α − T 3 lattices
Nascimento, J. P. G., Cunha, S. M., Paz, M. L. Á., Filho, R. N. C., Pereira, J. M., Peeters, F. M., & da Costa, D. R. (2025) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/b4tj-5rky · Cited by 5
Manipulating interface states in monolayer–bilayer graphene planar junctions
Zhao, F. P., Xu, L., & Zhang, J. (2016) · Journal of Physics Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/28/18/185001 · Cited by 4
Yan, Z. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1812.02191 · Cited by 9
Lam, K., & Liang, G. (2011) · Nanoscience and technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-22984-8_16 · Cited by 4
Electronic transport of bilayer graphene with asymmetry line defects
Zhao, X., Wu, Y.-J., Chen, C., Liang, Y., & Kou, S.-P. (2016) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/25/11/117303 · Cited by 4
Large area ultra-thin graphene films for functional photovoltaic devices
Dasari, M. R., Hautzinger, M. P., Fan-Hagenstein, H., et al. (2018) · Journal of materials research/Pratt's guide to venture capital sources · doi:10.1557/jmr.2018.198 · Cited by 4
The second-order combination Raman modes of bilayer graphene in the range of 1800-2150 cm-1
Li, Q., Zhang, X., Jiang-Bin, W., Lü, Y., Tan, P., Feng, Z., Jia, L. X., Cui, W., & Liu, Q. (2014) · Acta Physica Sinica · doi:10.7498/aps.63.147802 · Cited by 4
Ahmadi, Z., Goudarzi, H., & Jafari, A. (2016) · International Journal of Modern Physics B · doi:10.1142/s0217979216501228 · Cited by 5
Gate-independent energy gap in noncovalently intercalated bilayer graphene on SiC(0001)
Li, Y. (2016) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.245144 · Cited by 4
Hofstadter butterflies in magnetically modulated graphene bilayer: An algebraic approach
Arora, M., Sachdeva, R., & Ghosh, S. (2022) · Physica E Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures · doi:10.1016/j.physe.2022.115311 · Cited by 4
Controlling the activation energy of graphene-like thin films through disorder induced localization
Coleman, C., McIntosh, R., & Bhattacharyya, S. (2013) · Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4817067 · Cited by 4
Wanigasekara, S., Kattel, B., Rudayni, F., et al. (2021) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c02228 · Cited by 4
Tunable electronic properties of biased bilayer stanane via electric field
Zhang, J., Xu, C., Guo, Z. X., et al. (2020) · Chemical Physics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2020.137436 · Cited by 4
Kevorkyants, R. (2012) · Molecular Simulation · doi:10.1080/08927022.2012.666798 · Cited by 4
Rezania, H., & Azizi, F. (2025) · Physica E Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures · doi:10.1016/j.physe.2025.116276 · Cited by 5
Electrical conductivity of undoped bilayer Graphene: Beyond nearest neighbor approximation
Abbasi, A., & Rezania, H. (2019) · Chemical Physics · doi:10.1016/j.chemphys.2019.05.011 · Cited by 4
Dirac fermions duality in graphene: Ripples and fractional dimensions as function of temperature
Flores, J. C., & Palma-Chilla, L. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-31944-y · Cited by 4
Strain and electric field effect on arsenene and antimonene heterobilayers
Huang, B., Wu, J., Chen, C., et al. (2020) · Materials Research Express · doi:10.1088/2053-1591/ab6a4b · Cited by 4
Electronic States and Transport Properties of Carbon Crystalline: Graphene, Nanotube, and Graphite
Iye, Y. (2011) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-44-453153-7.00068-7 · Cited by 4
Structure and lattice symmetry tailoring in monolayer SnTe epitaxially grown on Au(111)
Liao, Q., Xie, S., Xu, S., Zhang, L., Tao, Y., Tian, Q., Zhang, C., Li, B., Tian, Y., Yin, L., et al. (2024) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/5.0219722 · Cited by 4
Valley relaxation in a single-electron bilayer graphene quantum dot
Wang, L., & Burkard, G. (2024) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.110.035409 · Cited by 4
A disorder induced field effect transistor in bilayer and trilayer graphene
Xu, D., Liu, H., Sacksteder, V., IV, Song, J., Jiang, H., Sun, Q.-F., & Xie, X. C. (2013) · Journal of Physics Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/25/10/105303 · Cited by 7
First Principles Calculations of Hydrogen Storage on Calcium-Decorated, Boron-Doped Bilayer Graphene
Zhu, X. (2018) · Journal of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering · doi:10.4236/msce.2018.611001 · Cited by 4
“335 nm, which is the thinnest of two-dimensional nanomaterials [8] [9].”
Optical properties of gated bilayer graphene quantum dots with trigonal warping
Albert, M., Miravet, D., Saleem, Y., Sadecka, K., Korkusiński, M., Bester, G., & Hawrylak, P. (2024) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.110.155421 · Cited by 4
Device characteristics and tight binding based modeling of bilayer graphene field-effect transistor
Ghobadi, N., & Abdi, Y. (2013) · Current Applied Physics · doi:10.1016/j.cap.2013.02.016 · Cited by 4
Wavefront dislocations in graphene systems revealed by transport measurement
Zhuang, Y.-C., & Sun, Q. (2023) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.107.235423 · Cited by 4
“The electric field breaks the inversion symmetry and induces a continuously voltage-tunable band gap [53].”
BackgroundElectronic structure and transport in materials with flat bands: 2D materials and quasicrystals
de Laissardière, G. T., Venkateswarlu, S., Missaoui, A., Jemaï, G., Chika, K., Vahedi, J., Namarvar, O. F., Julien, J. P., Honecker, A., Magaud, L., et al. (2025) · Physica E Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures · doi:10.1016/j.physe.2025.116362 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Castro, E. V., Novoselov, K. S., Morozov, S. V., Peres, N. M. R., dos Santos, J. M. B. L., Nilsson, J., Guinea, F., Geim, A. K., & Neto, A. H. C.
- Affiliations
- Universidade do Porto (PT)
- University of Manchester (GB)
- University of Minho (PT)
- Boston University (US)
- Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2007-11-20
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 216802-216802
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2113467957
- Cited by
- 2,033
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 54 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 85 · 2021: 101 · 2020: 134 · 2019: 102 · 2018: 95 · 2017: 121 · 2016: 134 · 2015: 130 · 2014: 142 · 2013: 146 · 2012: 145
- FWCI
- 55.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Bulletin of the American Physical Society
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Graphene research and applications
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › 2D Materials and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Quantum and electron transport phenomena
- Keywords
- bilayer graphene, electric field effects, band gap tuning, gate bias, Shubnikov-de Haas effect, cyclotron mass, tight-binding model, quantum Hall effect, electron density
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
