CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 122

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Microcavity-based generation of full Poincaré beams with arbitrary skyrmion numbers

Lin, Wenbo, Ota, Yasutomo, Arakawa, Yasuhiko, Iwamoto, Satoshi·2021·Physical Review Research
DOI 10.1103/physrevresearch.3.023055
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevresearch.3.023055

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Meron textures of the polarization Stokes field were experimentally generated by confining light into a liquid-crystal-filled microcavity.

    “The meron textures of the polarization Stokes field was experimentally generated by confining light into a liquid-crystal-filled microcavity (Fig. 4e) [57].”

    From Optical skyrmions and other topological quasiparticles of light (2024) · cites this paper as [57]

    The main text (page unavailable) says the authors numerically modeled full Poincaré beams from a silicon microring cavity, rather than experimentally generating meron textures in a liquid-crystal-filled cavity. The cited paper’s Stokes-vector discussion concerns those modeled beams; it does not change the contrary device and method descriptions. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. 10.1364/OL.22.000052 · DOI
  2. 10.1103/PhysRevA.91.023801 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/nphoton.2016.37 · DOI
  4. 10.1364/PRJ.5.000015 · DOI
  5. 10.1364/OE.18.010777 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2019.05.030 · DOI
  7. 10.1364/OE.20.020814 · DOI
  8. 10.1364/OE.23.034029 · DOI
  9. 10.1088/2040-8978/18/8/084003 · DOI
  10. 10.1088/2040-8978/18/7/074012 · DOI
  11. 10.1364/JOSAB.33.002172 · DOI
  12. 10.3807/COPP.2017.1.6.631 · DOI
  13. 10.1364/AO.51.002925 · DOI
  14. 10.1364/OE.21.008815 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1364/OE.23.012444 · DOI
  16. 10.1088/2040-8986/ab4c25 · DOI
  17. 10.1073/pnas.1610123114 · DOI
  18. 10.1103/PhysRevA.102.053513 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1038/nature09124 · DOI
  20. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.035301 · DOI
  21. 10.1038/ncomms1250 · DOI
  22. 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.045315 · DOI
  23. 10.1038/s41567-019-0487-7 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1364/OE.384718 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.106103 · DOI
  26. 10.1038/s41467-019-10252-7 · DOI
  27. 10.1364/OE.395590 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1126/science.1260635 · DOI
  29. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.037402 · DOI
  30. 10.1038/ncomms11183 · DOI
  31. 10.1126/science.1226528 · DOI
  32. 10.1364/OE.24.003168 · DOI
  33. 10.1038/s41467-018-03237-5 · DOI
  34. 10.1364/AOP.9.000129 · DOI
  35. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.147205 · DOI
  36. 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.024415 · DOI
  37. 10.1364/JOSAA.32.001468 · DOI
  38. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.013601 · DOI
  39. 10.1021/acsphotonics.7b00002 · DOI
  40. 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.054421 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1038/s41586-018-0745-3 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1364/OL.38.000534 · DOI
  43. 10.1364/OL.40.000597 · DOI
  44. 10.1038/nnano.2013.243 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lin, W., Ota, Y., Arakawa, Y., & Iwamoto, S.
Venue
Physical Review Research
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Published
2021-04-19
Volume
3
Issue
2
ISSN
2643-1564
DOI
10.1103/physrevresearch.3.023055
Cited by
122
References
4
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)
Funders
  • Japan Science and Technology Agency
  • Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (JPMJCR19T1)
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP15H05700, JP17H02796, JP19J13955)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review