The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Data tables for Lorentz andCPTviolation
Open accessAbstract
This work tabulates measured and derived values of coefficients for Lorentz and $CPT$ violation in the standard-model extension. Summary tables are extracted listing maximal attained sensitivities in the matter, photon, and gravity sectors. Tables presenting definitions and properties are also compiled.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CPT violation and the standard model
Colladay, D., & Kostelecký, V. A. (1997) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.55.6760 · Cited by 1,779
Self-citationSignals for Lorentz violation in electrodynamics
Kostelecký, V. A., & Mewes, M. (2002) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.66.056005 · Cited by 767
Self-citationConstraints on Lorentz violation from clock-comparison experiments
Kostelecký, V. A., & Lane, C. D. (1999) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.60.116010 · Cited by 378
Self-citationLimit on Lorentz and CPT Violation of the Neutron Using a Two-Species Noble-Gas Maser
Bear, D., Stoner, R. E., Walsworth, R. L., Kostelecký, V. A., & Lane, C. D. (2000) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.85.5038 · Cited by 309
Self-citationCPTand Lorentz Tests with Muons
Bluhm, R., Kostelecký, V. A., & Lane, C. D. (2000) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.84.1098 · Cited by 237
Self-citationPast Electron-Positrong−2Experiments Yielded Sharpest Bound onCPTViolation for Point Particles
Dehmelt, H., Mittleman, R., Van Dyck, R. S., & Schwinberg, P. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.4694 · Cited by 191
Observational limits on quantum geometry effects
Konopka, T. J., & Major, S. A. (2002) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/4/1/357 · Cited by 112
Bear, D., Stoner, R. E., Walsworth, R. L., Kostelecký, V. A., & Lane, C. D. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.209902 · Cited by 45
Self-citation
Cited by
The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
Will, C. M. (2014) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-4 · Cited by 3,996
Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics
Will, C. M. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781316338612 · Cited by 3,637
Quantum tests of the Einstein Equivalence Principle with the STE–QUEST space mission
Altschul, B., Bailey, Q. G., Blanchet, L., Bongs, K., Bouyer, P., Cacciapuoti, L., Capozziello, S., Gaaloul, N., Giulini, D., Hartwig, J., et al. (2015) · Advances in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.asr.2014.07.014 · Cited by 204
A parts-per-billion measurement of the antiproton magnetic moment
Smorra, C., Sellner, S., Borchert, M. J., Harrington, J. A., Higuchi, T., Nagahama, H., Tanaka, T., Mooser, A., Schneider, G., Bohman, M., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature24048 · Cited by 149
High-precision comparison of the antiproton-to-proton charge-to-mass ratio
Ulmer, S., Smorra, C., Mooser, A., Franke, K., Nagahama, H., Schneider, G., Higuchi, T., Van Gorp, S., Blaum, K., Matsuda, Y., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14861 · Cited by 147
Metadata
- Authors
- Kostelecký, V. A., & Russell, N.
- Venue
- Reviews of Modern Physics
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2011-03-10
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11-31
- ISSN
- 0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-0756
- OpenAlex
- W2157409049
- Cited by
- 1,390
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 72.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Data tables for Lorentz andCPTviolation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/revmodphys.83.11
- The paper
- Kostelecký, V. A., & Russell, N. (2011). Data tables for Lorentz andCPTviolation. Reviews of Modern Physics. https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.83.11
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
