Cited by 112Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsRelativity and Gravitational Theory

Observational limits on quantum geometry effects

Open access
Konopka, Tomasz J, Major, Seth A·2002·New Journal of Physics

Abstract

Using a form of modified dispersion relations derived in the context of quantum geometry, we investigate limits set by current observations on potential corrections to Lorentz invariance. We use a phenomological model in which there are separate parameters for photons, leptons and hadrons. Constraints on these parameters are derived using thresholds for the processes of photon stability, photon absorption, vacuum Cerenkov radiation, pion stability and the GZK cutoff. Although the allowed region in parameter space is tightly constrained, non-vanishing corrections to Lorentz symmetry due to quantum geometry are consistent with current astrophysical observations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1367-2630/4/1/357

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The level of constraints from threshold reactions at 50 TeV is around 10−2.

    “The level of constraints from threshold reactions at 50 TeV is around 10−2 [152, 167].”

    From Modern Tests of Lorentz Invariance (2005) · cites this paper as [167]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Ellis J, Mavromatos N E and Nanopoulos D V 2001 Space-time foam effects on particle interactions and the GZK cutoff Phys. Rev. D 63 124025 (Preprint hep-th/0012216) · arXiv
  2. Krennrich F et al 2001 Preprint astro-ph/0107113 · arXiv
  3. Kowalski-Glikman J and Nowak S 2002 Preprint hep-th/0203040 · arXiv
  4. Konopka T 2001 Quantum gravity effects on ultra high energy particles BA Thesis Hamilton College
  5. de Jager O C and Stecker F W 2002 Astrophys. J. 566 738 (Preprint astro-ph/0107103) · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Konopka, T. J., & Major, S. A.
Affiliations
Hamilton College (US)
Venue
New Journal of Physics
Published
2002-08-02
Volume
4
Pages
57-57
ISSN
1367-2630 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2076790486
Cited by
112
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
12.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • New Journal of Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Institut Périmètre de physique théorique
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Keywords
quantum geometry, modified dispersion relations, Lorentz violation, observational constraints, photon absorption, GZK cutoff, phenomenological model, high-energy astrophysics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review