The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparative Genomics in Salt Tolerance between Arabidopsis and Arabidopsis-Related Halophyte Salt Cress Using Arabidopsis Microarray
Open accessAbstract
Salt cress (Thellungiella halophila), a halophyte, is a genetic model system with a small plant size, short life cycle, copious seed production, small genome size, and an efficient transformation. Its genes have a high sequence identity (90%–95% at cDNA level) to genes of its close relative, Arabidopsis. These qualities are advantageous not only in genetics but also in genomics, such as gene expression profiling using Arabidopsis cDNA microarrays. Although salt cress plants are salt tolerant and can grow in 500 mm NaCl medium, they do not have salt glands or other morphological alterations either before or after salt adaptation. This suggests that the salt tolerance in salt cress results from mechanisms that are similar to those operating in glycophytes. To elucidate the differences in the regulation of salt tolerance between salt cress and Arabidopsis, we analyzed the gene expression profiles in salt cress by using a full-length Arabidopsis cDNA microarray. In salt cress, only a few genes were induced by 250 mm NaCl stress in contrast to Arabidopsis. Notably a large number of known abiotic- and biotic-stress inducible genes, including Fe-SOD, P5CS, PDF1.2, AtNCED, P-protein, β-glucosidase, and SOS1, were expressed in salt cress at high levels even in the absence of stress. Under normal growing conditions, salt cress accumulated Pro at much higher levels than did Arabidopsis, and this corresponded to a higher expression of AtP5CS in salt cress, a key enzyme of Pro biosynthesis. Furthermore, salt cress was more tolerant to oxidative stress than Arabidopsis. Stress tolerance of salt cress may be due to constitutive overexpression of many genes that function in stress tolerance and that are stress inducible in Arabidopsis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Chandok, M. R., Ytterberg, A. J., van Wijk, K. J., & Klessig, D. F. (2003) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00350-7 · Cited by 173
RetractedCluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns
Eisen, M. B., Spellman, P. T., Brown, P. O., & Botstein, D. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.25.14863 · Cited by 16,184
Zhu, J.-K. (2001) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/s1360-1385(00)01838-0 · Cited by 3,511
Self-citationYang, Y. H. (2002) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/30.4.e15 · Cited by 3,464
Salt Tolerance Conferred by Overexpression of a Vacuolar Na + /H + Antiport in Arabidopsis
Apse, M. P., Aharon, G. S., Snedden, W. A., & Blumwald, E. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.285.5431.1256 · Cited by 1,963
Seki, M., Narusaka, M., Ishida, J., Nanjo, T., Fujita, M., Oono, Y., Kamiya, A., Nakajima, M., Enju, A., Sakurai, T., et al. (2002) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.2002.01359.x · Cited by 1,924
Self-citationRegulatory network of gene expression in the drought and cold stress responses
Shinozaki, K., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K., & Seki, M. (2003) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/s1369-5266(03)00092-x · Cited by 1,787
Self-citationShinozaki, K., & Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. (2000) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/s1369-5266(00)80068-0 · Cited by 1,628
Self-citationCross talk between signaling pathways in pathogen defense
Kunkel, B. N., & Brooks, D. M. (2002) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/s1369-5266(02)00275-3 · Cited by 1,451
Kishor, P., Hong, Z., Miao, G. H., Hu, C., & Verma, D. (1995) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.108.4.1387 · Cited by 1,351
Cited by
Salinity tolerance in halophytes*
Flowers, T. J., & Colmer, T. D. (2008) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02531.x · Cited by 2,789
Research on plant abiotic stress responses in the post‐genome era: past, present and future
Hirayama, T., & Shinozaki, K. (2010) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2010.04124.x · Cited by 1,215
Self-citationTalke, I. N., Hanikenne, M., & Krämer, U. (2006) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.105.076232 · Cited by 452
Khanal, N., Bray, G., Grisnich, A., Moffatt, B., & Gray, G. (2017) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants6030032 · Cited by 32
Genetic response of growth phases for abiotic environmental stress tolerance in cereal crop plants
Ali, Q., & Malik, A. (2021) · Genetika · doi:10.2298/gensr2101419a · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Taji, T., Seki, M., Satou, M., Sakurai, T., Kobayashi, M., Ishiyama, K., Narusaka, Y., Narusaka, M., Zhu, J.-K., & Shinozaki, K.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-07-01
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1697-1709
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2163131631
- Cited by
- 594
- References
- 38
- FWCI
- 34.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative Genomics in Salt Tolerance between Arabidopsis and Arabidopsis-Related Halophyte Salt Cress Using Arabidopsis Microarray. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.104.039909
- The paper
- Taji, T., Seki, M., Satou, M., Sakurai, T., Kobayashi, M., Ishiyama, K., Narusaka, Y., Narusaka, M., Zhu, J.-K., & Shinozaki, K. (2004). Comparative Genomics in Salt Tolerance between Arabidopsis and Arabidopsis-Related Halophyte Salt Cress Using Arabidopsis Microarray. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.104.039909
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.