Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,308

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Presenting your structures: the CCP 4 mg molecular-graphics software

Open access
McNicholas, S., Potterton, E., Wilson, K. S., Noble, M. E. M.·2011·Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography
DOI 10.1107/s0907444911007281
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

CCP4mg is a molecular-graphics program that is designed to give rapid access to both straightforward and complex static and dynamic representations of macromolecular structures. It has recently been updated with a new interface that provides more sophisticated atom-selection options and a wizard to facilitate the generation of complex scenes. These scenes may contain a mixture of coordinate-derived and abstract graphical objects, including text objects, arbitrary vectors, geometric objects and imported images, which can enhance a picture and eliminate the need for subsequent editing. Scene descriptions can be saved to file and transferred to other molecules. Here, the substantially enhanced version 2 of the program, with a new underlying GUI toolkit, is described. A built-in rendering module produces publication-quality images.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1107/s0907444911007281

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Abagyan, 2006, Trends Biochem. Sci., 31, 76, 10.1016/j.tibs.2005.12.006 · DOI
  2. Artymiuk, 1989, J. Inform. Sci., 15, 287, 10.1177/016555158901500411 · DOI
  3. Bernstein, 2000, Trends Biochem. Sci., 25, 453, 10.1016/S0968-0004(00)01606-6 · DOI
  4. Carson, 1997, Methods Enzymol., 277, 493, 10.1016/S0076-6879(97)77027-7 · DOI
  5. Chan, 2004, J. Mol. Biol., 341, 503, 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.06.028 · DOI
  6. Christopher, 1996, Comput. Chem., 20, 339, 10.1016/0097-8485(95)00075-5 · DOI
  7. Connolly, 1983, Science, 221, 709, 10.1126/science.6879170 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Cowtan, 2003, IUCr Comput. Commun. Newsl., 2, 4
  9. Dayringer, 1986, J. Mol. Graph., 4, 82, 10.1016/0263-7855(86)80002-9 · DOI
  10. Edgar, 2004, Nucleic Acids Res., 32, 1792, 10.1093/nar/gkh340 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Emsley, 2010, Acta Cryst. D, 66, 486, 10.1107/S0907444910007493 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Esnouf, 1999, J. Mol. Graph., 15, 132, 10.1016/S1093-3263(97)00021-1 · DOI
  13. Esnouf, 1999, Acta Cryst. D, 55, 938, 10.1107/S0907444998017363 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Ferrin, 1988, J. Mol. Graph., 6, 13, 10.1016/0263-7855(88)80054-7 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Gans, 2001, J. Mol. Graph. Model., 19, 557, 10.1016/S1093-3263(01)00090-0 · DOI
  16. García-Nafría, 2010, Acta Cryst. D, 66, 953, 10.1107/S0907444910026272 · DOI
  17. González, 2001, Acta Cryst. D, 57, 767, 10.1107/S0907444901004255 · DOI
  18. Green, 2009, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 11713, 10.1073/pnas.0903228106 · DOI
  19. Gruber, 2007, Acta Cryst. D, 63, 50, 10.1107/S0907444906046762 · DOI
  20. Guex, 1997, Electrophoresis, 18, 2714, 10.1002/elps.1150181505 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Hartshorn, 2002, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des., 16, 871, 10.1023/A:1023813504011 · DOI
  22. Johnson, 2008, Nucleic Acids Res., 36, W5, 10.1093/nar/gkn201 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Kraulis, 1991, J. Appl. Cryst., 24, 946, 10.1107/S0021889891004399 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Krissinel, 2010, J. Comput. Chem., 31, 133, 10.1002/jcc.21303 · DOI
  25. Krissinel, 2004, Acta Cryst. D, 60, 2256, 10.1107/S0907444904026460 · DOI
  26. Krissinel, E. & Henrick, K. (2005). CompLife 2005, edited by M. R. Berthold, R. Glen, K. Diederichs, O. Kohlbacher & I. Fischer, pp. 163-174. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
  27. Krissinel, 2007, J. Mol. Biol., 372, 774, 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.05.022 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Krissinel, 2004, Acta Cryst. D, 60, 2250, 10.1107/S0907444904027167 · DOI
  29. Lee, 1971, J. Mol. Biol., 55, 379, 10.1016/0022-2836(71)90324-X · DOI
  30. Lesk, A. M., Bernstein, H. J. & Bernstein, F. C. (2008). Computational Structural Biology: Methods and Applications, edited by T. Schwede & M. Peitsch, pp. 729-770. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company.
  31. Martz, 2002, Trends Biochem. Sci., 27, 107, 10.1016/S0968-0004(01)02008-4 · DOI
  32. McWilliam, 2009, Nucleic Acids Res., 37, W6, 10.1093/nar/gkp302 · DOI
  33. Merritt, 1997, Methods Enzymol., 277, 505, 10.1016/S0076-6879(97)77028-9 · DOI
  34. Petterson, 2004, J. Comput. Chem., 25, 1605, 10.1002/jcc.20084 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Potterton, 2002, Acta Cryst. D, 58, 1955, 10.1107/S0907444902015391 · DOI
  36. Potterton, 2004, Acta Cryst. D, 60, 2288, 10.1107/S0907444904023716 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Sayle, 1995, Trends Biochem. Sci., 20, 374, 10.1016/S0968-0004(00)89080-5 · DOI

Cited by

See all 1,308

Metadata

Authors
McNicholas, S., Potterton, E., Wilson, K. S., & Noble, M. E. M.
Venue
Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography
Publisher
International Union of Crystallography (IUCr)
Published
2011-03-18
Volume
67
Issue
4
Pages
386-394
ISSN
0907-4449 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1107/s0907444911007281
OpenAlex
W1892158199
Cited by
1,308
References
2
FWCI
36.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Presenting your structures: the CCP 4 mg molecular-graphics software. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1107/s0907444911007281
The paper
McNicholas, S., Potterton, E., Wilson, K. S., & Noble, M. E. M. (2011). Presenting your structures: the CCP 4 mg molecular-graphics software. Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography. https://doi.org/10.1107/s0907444911007281

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.