Cited by 134Library Science and AdministrationSocial Capital and NetworksInformation Science and Libraries

Do libraries matter? Public libraries and the creation of social capital

Open access
Vårheim, Andreas, Steinmo, Sven, Ide, Eisaku·2008·Journal of Documentation

Abstract

Purpose Librarians and the library profession keep repeating that libraries contribute greatly to generating social capital by “building community”. However, little evidence of this has been presented. This paper aims to be a first step towards correcting this situation by asking whether public libraries matter in the creation of generalized trust. Design/methodology/approach This study used quantitative data in analyzing macro‐level data on whether public library expenditure could explain social trust patterns in the OECD countries. Additionally, a few qualitative interviews with public library leaders in the USA and Norway were used to indicate by what mechanisms, or by which processes, libraries generate generalized trust. Findings The main finding is that public libraries seem the most important factor in creating generalized trust in the OECD area, even more so than efficient/impartial public institutions. However, there is the problem of causal direction. It might be the case that it is high trusting countries that prioritize public libraries. Therefore, times series data are needed as well as qualitative data on the process of trust creation in the library. Interviews with library leaders point towards the fact that they see outreach activities as creating trust and that people trust the library. Replication of these results, however, is crucial. Moreover, the findings appear to indicate that when the library's attention is directed at disadvantaged groups of non‐users…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/00220410810912433

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Since 2007, several studies have been published on public libraries and social trust.

    “Since 2007, however, several studies have been published on the topic ðVårheim et al. 2008; Johnson and Griffis 2009; Johnson 2010, 2012; Vårheim 2011, 2014Þ2”
  • Vårheim et al. (2008) found that the level of public library spending had an independent effect upon social trust within the OECD area.

    “Reporting macro-level data, Andreas Vårheim et al. ð2008Þ found that the level of public library spending had an independent effect upon social trust within the OECD area.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vårheim, A., Steinmo, S., & Ide, E.
Affiliations
  • European University Institute (IT)
  • Yokohama National University (JP)
Venue
Journal of Documentation
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2008-10-17
Volume
64
Issue
6
Pages
877-892
ISSN
0022-0418 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1995092968
Cited by
134
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
FWCI
20.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Documentation (publishedVersion)
  • Cadmus - EUI Research Repository (European University Institute) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Administration
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Science and Libraries
Keywords
public libraries, social capital, generalized trust, social trust, library expenditures, community building, library outreach, library users, non-users, OECD countries, causal direction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review