The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Talent management decision making
Abstract
Purpose: The paper sets out to understand the key issues that emerge in the context of decision making. Design/methodology/approach: The paper is a literature review. Findings: First, the authors review debates around talent management decision making. Second, they examine some of the main factors currently influencing decision making in talent management. Third, they seek to identify some future research areas that will inform future decision making in talent management. Practical implications: The paper will be of interest to practitioners in designing and developing talent management decision systems. Originality/value: The paper presents a state of the art review of talent management decision marking.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution
Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. (2009) · Rugman Reviews · doi:10.1007/978-1-137-28787-8_25 · Cited by 4,101
The Meaning of Employee Engagement
Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.0002.x · Cited by 3,203
Managerial Perspectives on Risk and Risk Taking
March, J. G., & Shapira, Z. (1987) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.33.11.1404 · Cited by 3,183
Rational Decision-Making in Business OrganizationsPreprint
Simon, H. A. (1979) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 2,870
Strategic talent management: A review and research agenda
Collings, D. G., & Mellahi, K. (2009) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.04.001 · Cited by 1,837
Self-citationTalent management: A critical review
Lewis, R. E., & Heckman, R. J. (2006) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2006.03.001 · Cited by 1,341
The Boundaryless Career: A New Employment Principle for a New Organizational Era
Crocitto, M., Arthur, M. B., & Rousseau, D. M. (1998) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259107 · Cited by 1,233
Tarique, I., & Schuler, R. S. (2010) · Journal of World Business · doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2009.09.019 · Cited by 914
Collings, D. G., Scullion, H., & Morley, M. J. (2007) · Journal of World Business · doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2007.02.005 · Cited by 708
Self-citation
Cited by
Innovation in knowledge-intensive industries: The double-edged sword of coopetition
Bouncken, R. B., & Kraus, S. (2013) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.032 · Cited by 548
Transparency among S&P 500 companies: an analysis of ESG disclosure scores
Tamimi, N., & Sebastianelli, R. (2017) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-01-2017-0018 · Cited by 473
Meyers, M. C., & van Woerkom, M. (2014) · Journal of World Business · doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2013.11.003 · Cited by 417
Festing, M., & Schäfer, L. (2014) · Journal of World Business · doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2013.11.010 · Cited by 306
The search for global competence: From international HR to talent management
Cascio, W. F., & Boudreau, J. W. (2016) · Journal of World Business · doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2015.10.002 · Cited by 276
Metadata
- Authors
- Vaiman, V., Scullion, H., & Collings, D.
- Venue
- Management Decision
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2012-05-25
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 925-941
- ISSN
- 0025-1747 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2072249856
- Cited by
- 358
- References
- 63
- FWCI
- 53.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Talent management decision making. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/00251741211227663
- The paper
- Vaiman, V., Scullion, H., & Collings, D. (2012). Talent management decision making. Management Decision. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741211227663
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
