Cited by 188Management and Optimization Techniquesscientometrics and bibliometrics researchBusiness and Management Studies

Is production and operations management a discipline? A citation/co‐citation study

Pilkington, Alan, Liston‐Heyes, Catherine·1999·International Journal of Operations & Production Management

Abstract

For the past 20 years, the field of production and operations management (POM) has tried to establish itself as a discipline distinct from operations research (OR), management science (MS) and industrial engineering (IE). Sceptics argue that POM has failed to develop its own body of literature, lacks a distinct intellectual structure and that there is little appreciation of what it stands for. In this paper we use bibliometric techniques (a factor analysis of co‐citations) to investigate the intellectual pillars of the POM literature and explore whether these are distinct from those commonly associated with its rival fields. We also use simple non‐parametric techniques to show that the research agenda of European POM scholars differs substantially from that of their North American counterparts, and argue that such transatlantic differences may have exacerbated the difficulties POM has experienced in developing as a respected academic discipline.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/01443579910244188

Cites

99 of 99 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Co-citation analysis can be used in authors and/or publications order to track and study the relationship between authors, topics, journals or keywords.

    “Co-citation analysis can be used in authors and/or publications order to track and study the relationship between authors, topics, journals or keywords (Small 1973;Pilkington and Liston Heyes 1999).”

    From Big Data and supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis (2018) · cites this paper as Pilkington and Liston Heyes 1999

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pilkington, A., & Liston‐Heyes, C.
Affiliations
Royal Holloway University of London (GB)
Venue
International Journal of Operations & Production Management
Publisher
Emerald
Published
1999-01-01
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
7-20
ISSN
0144-3577 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2038078580
Cited by
188
References
99
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 14
FWCI
4.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Operations & Production Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management and Optimization Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Business and Management Studies
Keywords
operations management, academic discipline status, intellectual structure, co-citation analysis, operations research, management science, industrial engineering, research agenda

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review