The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consumers and brands: a study of the impact of self‐image congruence on brand preference and satisfaction
Abstract
Previous research indicates that the self‐image product image congruity (commonly known as self‐image congruence) can affect consumers’ product preferences and their purchase intentions. Self‐image congruence can also facilitate positive behaviour and attitudes toward products. This paper reports findings from a research study which was conducted to determine the effect of self‐image congruity on brand preference and satisfaction in the precious jewellery market in the UK. A questionnaire was sent to 500 consumers of precious jewellery in five major cities of the UK. Results indicate that self‐image congruity was a very strong predictor of consumers’ brand preferences and a good predictor of consumer satisfaction. Respondents with higher levels of self‐image congruity were more likely to prefer the brand and enjoy higher levels of satisfaction with the brand as compared to those with lower levels of self‐image congruity. The paper discusses the implications for brand managers so that they can position their brands in an effective way.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions
Oliver, R. L. (1980) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378001700405 · Cited by 14,494
Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.41.9.954 · Cited by 5,806
An Investigation into the Determinants of Customer Satisfaction
Churchill, G. A., & Surprenant, C. (1982) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151722 · Cited by 2,914
Personality and consumer behavior: A review
Kassarjian, H. H. (1971) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377100800401 · Cited by 601
Cited by
De Vries, N. J., & Carlson, J. (2014) · Journal of Brand Management · doi:10.1057/bm.2014.18 · Cited by 418
Yoon, N., & Lee, H.-K. (2021) · Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research · doi:10.3390/jtaer16050107 · Cited by 104
A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Consumers’ Conspicuous Consumption of Branded Fashion Accessories
Souiden, N., M’Saad, B., & Pons, F. (2011) · Journal of International Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1080/08961530.2011.602951 · Cited by 104
The Role of Authenticity in Airbnb Experiences
Lalicic, L., & Weismayer, C. (2017) · Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2017 · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-51168-9_56 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Jamal, A., & Goode, M. M. H.
- Venue
- Marketing Intelligence & Planning
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2001-12-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 482-492
- ISSN
- 0263-4503 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1994013453
- Cited by
- 407
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 6.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.