The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social media and international advertising: theoretical challenges and future directions
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: The primary aim of this article is to identify theoretical foundations that can be used in research on social media in the context of international advertising research. An additional objective is to identify future research directions for theory building in this research area. Design/methodology/approach: The article draws on the extant literature to identify three key theoretical foundations that can be used in research on advertising in media from an advertising perspective: networking capability; image transferability; and personal extensibility. For each of these perspectives, the current state of knowledge, theoretical challenges, and future research directions are summarized. Findings: The three key theoretical perspectives (networking capability, image transferability, and personal extensibility) provide strong potential for better understanding the advantages and disadvantages of social media use for advertisers. They are also useful for identifying important research gaps that need to be filled in the future. Research limitations/implications: Research on social media advertising in an international context is still in its infancy, and needs further attention. As few cross‐cultural studies have been conducted, the theories and their application will likely evolve in the future. Originality/value: A review and conceptual framework pertaining to theoretical perspective used in social media research in an international advertising context has been practically non‐existent. Thus, this article is designed to serve as a solid starting point for future research endeavors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003 · Cited by 17,875
Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix
Mangold, W. G., & Faulds, D. J. (2009) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2009.03.002 · Cited by 4,111 · cited 2×
“According to self-schema theory, consumers tend to talk to others about products when those products reflect their desired self-image, or the way they want others to see them (Mangold and Faulds, 2009).”
BackgroundDonath, J., & Boyd, D. (2004) · BT Technology Journal · doi:10.1023/b:bttj.0000047585.06264.cc · Cited by 1,399
How Does Brand-related User-generated Content Differ across YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter?
Smith, A. N., Fischer, E., & Yongjian, C. (2012) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2012.01.002 · Cited by 1,044
Electronic word of mouth (eWOM): How eWOM platforms influence consumer product judgement
Lee, M., & Youn, S. (2009) · International Journal of Advertising · doi:10.2501/s0265048709200709 · Cited by 662
Cited by
Social media in marketing: A review and analysis of the existing literature
Alalwan, A. A., Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Algharabat, R. (2017) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2017.05.008 · Cited by 1,123
Advertising in social media: a review of empirical evidence
Knoll, J. (2016) · International Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/02650487.2015.1021898 · Cited by 362
Odoom, R., Anning-Dorson, T., & Acheampong, G. (2017) · Journal of Enterprise Information Management · doi:10.1108/jeim-04-2016-0088 · Cited by 267
Zhou, S., Blazquez, M., McCormick, H., & Barnes, L. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.011 · Cited by 181
Like or dislike? Adolescents’ responses to personalized social network site advertising
Walrave, M., Poels, K., Antheunis, M. L., Van den Broeck, E., & van Noort, G. (2018) · Journal of Marketing Communications · doi:10.1080/13527266.2016.1182938 · Cited by 112
Metadata
- Authors
- Okazaki, S., & Taylor, C. R.
- Venue
- International Marketing Review
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2013-02-15
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 56-71
- ISSN
- 0265-1335 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2074161260
- Cited by
- 396
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 79.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social media and international advertising: theoretical challenges and future directions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/02651331311298573
- The paper
- Okazaki, S., & Taylor, C. R. (2013). Social media and international advertising: theoretical challenges and future directions. International Marketing Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651331311298573
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.