The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What determines Turkish customers' acceptance of internet banking?
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: The purpose of this article is to provide an insight into the determinants of customers' internet banking (IB) acceptance. Therefore, it attempts to address a research need for extending the technology acceptance model (TAM) by adding contextual factors for IB case. Design/methodology/approach: A research model reflecting the effects of perceived risk (PR), perceived playfulness (PPL) and perceived behavioral control (PBC) on TAM constructs is proposed. The partial least squares (PLS) procedure is used to analyze 161 cases collected from individual IB users through a web‐based survey. Findings: The results indicate that perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived ease of use (PEOU) are immediate direct determinants of customers' attitudes towards using IB (ATT). PU, PR and ATT determine the large proportion of behavioral intentions to use IB (BI). Although PPL positively influences only PEOU, PBC exerts positive direct effects on PEOU and PU and indirect effects on PU and ATT. Research limitations/implications: The study findings were obtained from the single snapshot research, the small data set covering only active e‐mail users and the participants' self‐reports about BI. Therefore, the future research should carry a longitudinal nature to show the temporal change effects, remedy the possibility of self‐selection bias with a broader research sample and validate the IB usage externally instead of self‐reported BI. Originality/value: This study supplies the valuable information for researchers and practitioners about the effects of PR, PPL and PBC on IB adaptation behavior of Turkish customers. Furthermore, the study reveals that extended TAM could be used to provide a solid theoretical foundation of IB acceptance case.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03206553 · Cited by 17,383
A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.83 · Cited by 9,406
Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.6.2.144 · Cited by 8,815
Confidence Limits for the Indirect Effect: Distribution of the Product and Resampling Methods
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4 · Cited by 7,806
Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888 · Cited by 7,611 · cited 1×
“TAM is an extension of the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA), developed by Fishbein and Ajzen (1977)”
Venkatesh, V. (2000) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872 · Cited by 6,664
Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace 1
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x · Cited by 6,231 · cited 3×
“Based on TRA, TAM assumes that two personal beliefs about the ease of use (PEOU) and usefulness (PU) of the computer system influence ATT, which in turn lead to BI and then generate behavior to use the system (Davis et al., 1992; Venkatesh and Davis, 1996).”
BackgroundResultWork and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value
Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., & Griffin, M. (1994) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209376 · Cited by 6,020
Cited by
Alalwan, A. A., Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., & Algharabat, R. (2018) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.08.026 · Cited by 576
Padilla-Meléndez, A., del Aguila-Obra, A. R., & Garrido-Moreno, A. (2013) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.014 · Cited by 447
Online banking adoption: an empirical analysis
Yee‐Loong Chong, A., Ooi, K., Lin, B., & Tan, B. (2010) · International Journal of Bank Marketing · doi:10.1108/02652321011054963 · Cited by 343
Tiwari, C. K., Bhat, M. A., Khan, S. T., Subramaniam, R., & Khan, M. A. I. (2024) · Interactive Technology and Smart Education · doi:10.1108/itse-04-2023-0061 · Cited by 315
A systematic review of Internet banking adoption
Hanafizadeh, P., Keating, B. W., & Khedmatgozar, H. R. (2014) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2013.04.003 · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- Çelik, H.
- Venue
- International Journal of Bank Marketing
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2008-07-25
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 353-370
- ISSN
- 0265-2323 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1969941463
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 12.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What determines Turkish customers' acceptance of internet banking? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/02652320810894406
- The paper
- Çelik, H. (2008). What determines Turkish customers' acceptance of internet banking? International Journal of Bank Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/02652320810894406
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.