The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using Neural Network Analysis to Evaluate Buyer‐Seller Relationships
Abstract
Conceptual arguments favouring a relational rather than a transactional approach to the study of buyer‐seller relationships are now well understood. However, attempts to quantify the factors contributing towards relationship quality have been held back by the complexity of the underlying factors and their interrelatedness. Traditional regression techniques are not effective in analysing data with high levels of multi‐collinearity and missing information, typical in many studies of buyer behaviour. Makes use of a relatively new technique – neural network analysis – to try to quantify the factors contributing to buyer‐seller relationship quality. The technique uses a statistically‐based learning procedure modelled on the workings of the human brain which quantifies the relationship between input and output variables through an intermediate “hidden” variable level analogous to the brain. For this study, a neural network was developed with two outcome components of relationship quality (relationship satisfaction and trust), and five input antecedents (the salesperson′s sales orientation, customer orientation, expertise, ethics and the relationship′s duration). In a comparison of multiple regression and neural network techniques, the latter was found to give statistically more significant outcomes. New applications within marketing for neural network analysis are being found. Contributes towards the development of the technique and suggests a number of further possible applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Developing buyer-seller relationships
Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H., & Oh, S. (1987) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224298705100202 · Cited by 9,139
Relationship Quality in Services Selling: An Interpersonal Influence Perspective
Crosby, L. A., Evans, K. R., & Cowles, D. (1990) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299005400306 · Cited by 4,763
Crosby, L. A., & Stephens, N. (1987) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151388 · Cited by 456
Cited by
Investments in Consumer Relationships: A Cross-Country and Cross-Industry Exploration
De Wulf, K., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Iacobucci, D. (2001) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.65.4.33.18386 · Cited by 2,083
Relationship quality as a predictor of B2B customer loyalty
Rauyruen, P., & Miller, K. E. (2007) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.11.006 · Cited by 1,123
Woo, K., & Ennew, C. T. (2004) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/03090560410548960 · Cited by 273
Effects of e-CRM on customer–bank relationship quality and outcomes: The case of Thailand
Sivaraks, P., Krairit, D., & Tang, J. C. S. (2011) · The Journal of High Technology Management Research · doi:10.1016/j.hitech.2011.09.006 · Cited by 98
Determinants of relationship quality and customer loyalty in retail banking
Izogo, E. E., Reza, A., Ogba, I.-E., & Oraedu, C. (2017) · African Journal of Economic and Management Studies · doi:10.1108/ajems-01-2016-0011 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Wray, B., Palmer, A., & Bejou, D.
- Venue
- European Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 1994-10-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 32-48
- ISSN
- 0309-0566 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1968806916
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 2.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using Neural Network Analysis to Evaluate Buyer‐Seller Relationships. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/03090569410075777
- The paper
- Wray, B., Palmer, A., & Bejou, D. (1994). Using Neural Network Analysis to Evaluate Buyer‐Seller Relationships. European Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569410075777
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.