Cited by 547Organizational Change and LeadershipManagement and Organizational StudiesAppreciative Inquiry and Organizational Change

Discursive manifestations of contradictions in organizational change efforts: A methodological framework

Engeström, Yrjö, Sannino, Annalisa·2011·Journal of Organizational Change Management

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to introduce a new methodological framework for the identification and analysis of different types of discursive manifestations of contradictions. Design/methodology/approach: The paper is based on the dialectical tradition of cultural‐historical activity theory. The methodological framework is developed by means of analyzing the entire transcribed corpus of the discourse conducted in a change laboratory intervention consisting of eight sessions and altogether 189,398 words. Findings: Four types of discursive manifestations, namely dilemmas, conflicts, critical conflicts, and double binds, could be effectively identified in the data. Specific linguistic cues were a useful first level of approaching the different types of manifestations. Critical conflicts and double binds were found to be particularly effective lenses on systemic contradictions. Research limitations/implications: The paper points to the need for theoretical and conceptual rigor in studies using the notion of contradiction . Further empirical testing of the framework is needed and may lead to more refined or alternative categories. Practical implications: Dynamics of different organizational change interventions may be effectively analyzed and compared with the help of the framework. Originality/value: The paper presents an original, empirically‐tested methodological framework that may be a valuable resource for analyzes of contradictions driving organizational change.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/09534811111132758

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although critical conflicts refer to experienced inner conflicts of an individual, their roots are often in contradictions that stem from the culture, institutions and organisations to which the individual is attached.

    “Although critical conflicts refer to experienced inner conflicts of an individual, their roots are often in contradictions that stem from the culture, institutions and organisations to which the individual is attached (Engeström and Sannino 2011; Sannino 2010).”

    From Tensions and striving for coherence in an academic’s professional identity work (2018) · cites this paper as Engeström and Sannino 2011

  • The discursive manifestation of these conflicts or inner tensions can appear as critical conflicts or double-binds.

    “The discursive manifestation of these conflicts or inner tensions can appear as critical conflicts or double-binds (Engeström and Sannino 2011; Sannino 2010).”

    From Tensions and striving for coherence in an academic’s professional identity work (2018) · cites this paper as Engeström and Sannino 2011

  • Tensions and contradictions, and their discursive manifestations, such as critical conflicts and double binds, can be seen as a means of arousing (and tracing) changes in one's identity and I-positioning.

    “Tensions and contradictions, and their discursive manifestations, such as critical conflicts and double binds (Engeström and Sannino 2011; Sannino 2010), can be seen as a means of arousing (and tracing) changes in one ' s identity and I-positioning.”

    From Tensions and striving for coherence in an academic’s professional identity work (2018) · cites this paper as Engeström and Sannino 2011

  • Anna's emotionally and morally charged personal distress is manifested in conflicting motives.

    “Her emotionally and morally charged personal distress is manifested in confl icting motives (Engeström and Sannino 2011; Sannino 2010).”

    From Tensions and striving for coherence in an academic’s professional identity work (2018) · cites this paper as Engeström and Sannino 2011

  • There is a contradiction in Anna's discourse that can be explained through the concept of double-bind.

    “There is a contradiction in Anna ' s discourse that can be explained through the concept of double-bind (Engeström and Sannino 2011).”

    From Tensions and striving for coherence in an academic’s professional identity work (2018) · cites this paper as Engeström and Sannino 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A.
Affiliations
University of Helsinki (FI)
Venue
Journal of Organizational Change Management
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2011-05-24
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
368-387
ISSN
0953-4814 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1574578141
Cited by
547
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 7
FWCI
35.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Organizational Change Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Change and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Appreciative Inquiry and Organizational Change
Keywords
contradiction, organizational change, cultural-historical activity theory, dilemmas, conflict, double bind, systemic contradictions, linguistic cues, methodological framework

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review