Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 300

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Organizational change as shifting conversations

Ford, Jeffrey D.·1999·Journal of Organizational Change Management

Abstract

Abstract This article explores producing and managing change within conversationally constructed realities. Conversations are proposed as both the medium and product of reality construction within which change is a process of shifting conversations in the network of conversations that constitute organizations. In this context, change entails bringing new conversations into a sustained existence and the job of change managers is to create the conversational realities that produce effective action rather than to align organizations with some ` ̀ true' ' reality. What might be the implications for organizational change management if we took the idea of organizations as socially constructed realities seriously? Although some of the organization change literature adopts such a constructivist view (e.g. Czarnawaska, 1997; Tenkasi and Boland, 1993), most of it adopts a structural-functionalist view (Burrell and Morgan, 1979) in which the job of change agents is to align, fit, or adapt organizations, through interventions, to an objective reality that exists ` ̀ out there''. The efficacy of these interventions is seen both as a demonstration of a change agent's ability to accurately mirror reality, i.e. the world is as the agent knows it to be (Watzlawick, 1990), and the ability to apply the appropriate intervention(s) for that reality (Beer, 1980). Successful change, therefore, ultimately depends on the ability to accurately mirror or represent reality and to choose and implement interventions appropriate to that reality. But what if we consider organizations as socially constructed realities in which the reality we know is interpreted, constructed, enacted, and maintained through discourse (Berger and Luckmann, 1966; Holzner, 1972; Searle, 1995; Watzlawick, 1984a; Weick, 1979). What if our knowledge and understanding of reality is not a mirror of some underlying ` ̀ true' ' reality, nor a reproduction of that reality? Rather, what if our knowledge of reality is itself a construction that is created in the process of making sense of things (Astley, 1985; Knorr-Cetina,

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/09534819910300855

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 68 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Hamel, G. and Prahalad, C. (1989), “Strategic intent”,Harvard Business Review, Vol. 66 No. 3, pp. 63‐76.
  2. 10.1108/09534819410072755 · doi:10.1108/09534819410072755
  3. Johnson, P. (1988), “Why I race against phantom competitors”,Harvard Business Review, Vol. 66 No. 5, pp. 105‐12.
  4. Marzano, R., Zaffron, S. Zraik, L. Robbins, S. and Yoon, L. (1995), “A new paradigm for educational change”,Education, Vol. 116 No. 2, pp. 162‐73.
  5. 10.1287/orsc.6.3.322 · doi:10.1287/orsc.6.3.322
  6. Pascarella, P. (1987), “Create breakthroughs in performance by changing the conversation”,Industry Week, 15 June, pp. 50‐7.
  7. 10.1002/hrm.3930280308 · doi:10.1002/hrm.3930280308
  8. Spivey, N. (1997),The Constructivist Metaphor, Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
  9. Thachankary, T. (1992), “Organizations as ‘texts’: hermeneutics as a model for understanding organizational change”,Research in Organizational Change and Development, Vol. 6,pp. 197‐233.

Cited by

See all 300

Metadata

Authors
Ford, J. D.
Venue
Journal of Organizational Change Management
Publisher
Emerald
Published
1999-12
Volume
12
Issue
6
Pages
480-500
ISSN
0953-4814 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2058940833
Cited by
300
References
68
FWCI
4.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.emeraldinsight.com/page/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organizational change as shifting conversations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/09534819910300855
The paper
Ford, J. D. (1999). Organizational change as shifting conversations. Journal of Organizational Change Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534819910300855

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.