The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Customer perceptions of e‐service quality in online shopping
Abstract
Purpose: This paper develops a research model to examine the relationship among e‐service quality dimensions and overall service quality, customer satisfaction and purchase intentions. Design/methodology/approach: Data from a survey of 297 online consumers were used to test the research model. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to examine the reliability and validity of the measurement model, and the structural equation modelling technique was used to test the research model. Findings: The analytical results showed that the dimensions of web site design, reliability, responsiveness, and trust affect overall service quality and customer satisfaction. Moreover, the latter in turn are significantly related to customer purchase intentions. However, the personalization dimension is not significantly related to overall service quality and customer satisfaction. Research limitations/implications: Future research can use different methodologies, such as longitudinal studies, focus groups and interviews, to examine the relationship between service quality and customer purchase behaviour in online shopping contexts. Practical implications: This study suggests that to enhance customer purchase intentions, online stores should develop marketing strategies to better address the trustworthiness, reliability, and responsiveness of web‐based services. Online stores can devote valuable corporate resources to the important e‐service quality attributes identified by this study. Originality/value: This study developed the instrument dimensions of e‐service quality by modifying the SERVQUAL model to consider online shopping context. Moreover, the results of this study provide a valuable reference for managers of online stores, as well as for researchers interested in internet marketing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/bf02723327 · Cited by 26,163
SERVQUAL: A multiple-Item Scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality
Parasuraman, A., Berry, L. L., & Zeithaml, V. A. (1988) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.14579729 · Cited by 21,118
Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model1
Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036519 · Cited by 8,635
E-commerce: the role of familiarity and trust.
Gefen, D. (2000) · Omega · doi:10.1016/s0305-0483(00)00021-9 · Cited by 3,529
eTailQ: dimensionalizing, measuring and predicting etail quality
Wolfinbarger, M., & Gilly, M. C. (2003) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/s0022-4359(03)00034-4 · Cited by 2,340
Antecedents of B2C Channel Satisfaction and Preference: Validating e-Commerce Metrics
Devaraj, S., Fan, M., & Kohli, R. (2002) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.13.3.316.77 · Cited by 1,205
Conceptualizing Web site quality and its consequences in the lodging industry
Jeong, M., Oh, H., & Gregoire, M. (2003) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/s0278-4319(03)00016-1 · Cited by 337
Research works printed but not linked: 40
- Baker, D.A. and Crompton, J.L. (2000), “Quality, satisfaction and behavioural intentions”, Annual of Tourism Research, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 785‐804. · DOI · Paper page
- Bakos, Y. (1991), “A strategic analysis of electronic marketplace”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 295‐310. · DOI · Paper page
- Barnes, S.J. and Vidgen, R. (2001), “An evaluation of cyber‐bookshops: the WebQual method”, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 11‐30. · DOI · Paper page
- Carr, C.L. (2002), “A psychometric evaluation of the expectation, perceptions, and difference‐scores generated by the IS‐adapted SERVQUAL instrument”, Decision Sciences, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 281‐96. · DOI
- Cho, N. and Park, S. (2001), “Development of electronic commerce user – consumer satisfaction index (ECUSI) for internet shopping”, Industrial Management and Data Systems, Vol. 101 No. 8, pp. 400‐5. · DOI · Paper page
- Cronin, J.J. and Taylor, S.A. (1992), “Measuring service quality: a re‐examination and extension”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 56 No. 3, pp. 55‐68. · DOI · Paper page
- Graeff, T.R. and Harmon, S. (2002), “Collecting and using personal data: consumers' awareness and concerns”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 302‐18. · DOI · Paper page
- Gurau, C., Ranchhod, A. and Gauzente, C. (2003), “To legislate or not to legislate: a comparative exploratory study of privacy/personalisation factors affecting French, UK and US web sites”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 20 No. 7, pp. 652‐64. · DOI
- Hoyle, R.H. (1995), Structuring Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues and Applications, Sage Publications, London.
- Janda, S., Trocchia, P.J. and Gwinner, K.P. (2002), “Customer perceptions of internet retail service quality”, International Journal of Service Industry Management, Vol. 13 No. 5, pp. 412‐31. · DOI · Paper page
- Jiang, J.J., Klein, G. and Carr, C.L. (2002), “Measuring information system service quality: SERVQUAL from the other side”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 145‐66. · DOI · Paper page
- Kaynama, S.A. and Black, C.L. (2000), “A proposal to assess the service quality of online travel agencies: an exploratory study”, Journal of Professional Services Marketing, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 63‐88. · DOI · Paper page
- Kim, J. and Lee, J. (2002), “Critical design factors for successful e‐commerce systems”, Behaviour and Information Technology, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 185‐9. · DOI · Paper page
- Kimery, K.M. and McCard, M. (2002), “Third‐party assurances: mapping the road to trust in e‐retailing”, Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 63‐82.
- Krauter, S.G. and Kaluscha, E.A. (2003), “Empirical research in online trust: a review and critical assessment”, International Journal of Human Computer Studies, Vol. 58 No. 6, pp. 783‐812. · DOI · Paper page
- Kuo, Y.F. (2003), “A study on service quality of virtual community web sites”, Total Quality Management, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 461‐73. · DOI
- Li, Y.N., Tan, K.C. and Xie, M. (2002), “Measuring web‐based service quality”, Total Quality Management, Vol. 13 No. 5, pp. 685‐700. · DOI · Paper page
- Liao, Z. and Cheung, M.T. (2002), “Internet based e‐banking and consumer attitudes: an empirical study”, Information and management, Vol. 39 No. 4, pp. 283‐95. · DOI · Paper page
- Liu, C. and Arnett, K.P. (2000), “Exploring the factors associated with web site success in the context of electronic commerce”, Information and Management, Vol. 38 No. 1, pp. 23‐33. · DOI · Paper page
- Llusar, J.C.B., Zornoza, C.C. and Tena, A.B.E. (2001), “Measuring the relationship between firm perceived quality and customer satisfaction and its influence on purchase intentions”, Total Quality Management, Vol. 12 No. 6, pp. 719‐34. · DOI
- Martensen, A., Gronholdt, L. and Kristensen, K. (2000), “The drivers of customer satisfaction and loyalty: cross industry finding from Denmark”, Total Quality Management, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 544‐53. · DOI
- McKnight, D.H., Chudhury, V. and Kacmar, C. (2002), “The impact of initial customer trust on intentions to transact with a web site: a trust building model”, Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 297‐323. · DOI · Paper page
- Negash, S., Ryan, T. and Igbaria, M. (2003), “Quality and effectiveness in web‐based customer support systems”, Information and Management, Vol. 40 No. 8, pp. 757‐68. · DOI · Paper page
- Nunnally, J.C. and Bernstein, I.H. (1994), Psychometric Theory, McGraw‐Hill, New York, NY.
- Parasuraman, A. and Grewal, D. (2000), “The impact of technology on the quality‐value‐loyalty chain: a research agenda”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 168‐74. · DOI · Paper page
- Pitt, L.F., Watson, R.T. and Kavan, C.B. (1997), “Measuring information systems service quality: concerns for a complete canvas”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 209‐21. · DOI · Paper page
- Reichheld, F.F. and Schefter, P. (2000), “E‐loyalty: your secret weapon on the web”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 78 No. 4, pp. 105‐13.
- Rust, R.T. and Zahorik, A. (1993), “Customer satisfaction, customer retention, and market share”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 69 No. 2, pp. 193‐215. · DOI · Paper page
- Santos, J. (2003), “E‐service quality: a model of virtual service quality dimensions”, Management Service Quality, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 233‐46. · DOI · Paper page
- Sivadas, E. and Prewitt, J.B. (2000), “An examination of the relationship between service quality, customer satisfaction, and store loyalty”, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, Vol. 28 No. 2, pp. 73‐82. · DOI · Paper page
- Than, C.R. and Grandon, E. (2002), “An exploratory examination of factors affecting online sales”, Journal of Computer Information Systems, Vol. 42 No. 3, pp. 87‐93.
- Tsikriktsis, N. (2002), “Does culture influence web site quality expectations? An empirical study”, Journal of Service Research, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 101‐12. · DOI
- van Dyke, T.P., Prybutok, V.R. and Kappelman, L.A. (1999), “Cautions on the use of the SERVQUAL measure to assess the quality of information systems services”, Decision Sciences, Vol. 30 No. 3, pp. 877‐91. · DOI · Paper page
- van Riel, A.C.R., Liljander, V. and Jurriens, P. (2001), “Exploring customer evaluations of e‐service: a portal site”, International Journal of Service Industry Management, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 359‐77. · DOI · Paper page
- Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.F. (2000), “A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies”, Management Science, Vol. 46 No. 2, pp. 186‐204. · DOI · Paper page
- Wu, S.I. (2003), “Relationship between consumer characteristics attitude toward online shopping”, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 37‐44. · DOI · Paper page
- Yang, Z. (2001), “Customer perceptions of service quality in internet‐based electronic commerce”, Proceedings of the 30th EMAC Conference, Bergen, pp. 8‐11.
- Yang, Z. and Jun, M. (2002), “Consumer perception of e‐service quality: from internet purchaser and non‐purchaser perspectives”, Journal of Business Strategies, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 19‐41. · DOI · Paper page
- Zeithaml, V.A. (2002), “Service excellent in electronic channels”, Managing Service Quality, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 135‐8. · DOI · Paper page
- Zhu, F.X., Wymer, W. and Chen, I. (2002), “IT‐based services and service quality in consumer banking”, International Journal of Service Industry Management, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 69‐90. · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
The impact of e-service quality and customer satisfaction on customer behavior in online shopping
Rita, P., Oliveira, T., & Farisa, A. (2019) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02690 · Cited by 917
Shiau, W.-L., & Luo, M. M. (2012) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.030 · Cited by 471
(2011) · Journal of electronic commerce research · Cited by 456
Predicting consumer intentions to shop online: An empirical test of competing theories
Lin, H.-F. (2007) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2007.02.002 · Cited by 435
Self-citationDeveloping e-service quality scales: A literature review
Ladhari, R. (2010) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2010.06.003 · Cited by 414
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, G., & Lin, H.
- Venue
- International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2005-02-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 161-176
- ISSN
- 0959-0552 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1971684258
- Cited by
- 1,318
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 35.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Customer perceptions of e‐service quality in online shopping. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/09590550510581485
- The paper
- Lee, G., & Lin, H. (2005). Customer perceptions of e‐service quality in online shopping. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/09590550510581485
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.