The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact of privacy concern in social networking web sites
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to understand the impact of users' privacy concerns on their acceptance of social networking web sites (SNWs). Design/methodology/approach: This paper develops two research models, with privacy concern conceptualized either as an antecedent of acceptance intention, or as a moderator of the relationships in the technology acceptance model (TAM). Using a survey questionnaire, empirical data were collected from 428 undergraduate college students. Structured equation modeling was used to test the validity of the proposed research models. Findings: The privacy concerns of the research respondents were found to be statistically significant. However, they did not directly affect users' acceptance of social networking web sites. Instead, privacy concerns did moderate the effects of perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use, on users' intention to continue to use SNWs. Research limitations/implications: The study identifies the theoretical foundations of privacy and privacy concerns in the context of SNWs. This empirical study, based on an established theoretical foundation, will help the research community to gain a deeper understanding of the impacts of privacy concern in the context of social networking. Practical implications: The findings of this study can provide SNW operators with useful strategies and tactics to enhance users' acceptance depending on their level of privacy concern. Originality/value: With the worldwide rapid growth of SNWs, there have been ongoing concerns about how users' private information is viewed or used by others. This study provides much needed empirical evidence about the impact of privacy concerns on users' acceptance of SNWs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship
boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x · Cited by 16,251
Venkatesh, V. (2000) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872 · Cited by 6,664
The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future
Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., & Larsen, K. R. T. (2003) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.01250 · Cited by 2,572
Information revelation and privacy in online social networks
Gross, R., & Acquisti, A. (2005) · Proceedings of the 2005 ACM workshop on Privacy in the electronic society · doi:10.1145/1102199.1102214 · Cited by 2,028 · cited 3×
“Even though there is privacy concern in general, their attitude toward SNW is not significantly negative (Gross and Acquisti, 2005).”
BackgroundInfluentialExamining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology
Hu, P. J., Chau, P. Y. K., Sheng, O. R. L., & Tam, K. Y. (1999) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.1999.11518247 · Cited by 1,951
Dabholkar, P. A., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2002) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070302303001 · Cited by 1,898
Imagined Communities: Awareness, Information Sharing, and Privacy on the Facebook
Acquisti, A., & Gross, R. (2006) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/11957454_3 · Cited by 1,895
The Relative Importance of Perceived Ease of Use in IS Adoption: A Study of E-Commerce Adoption
Drexel University, Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Georgia State University (2000) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00008 · Cited by 1,833
Testing the technology acceptance model across cultures: A three country study
Straub, D., Keil, M., & Brenner, W. (1997) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(97)00026-8 · Cited by 1,246
Cited by
The age of mobile social commerce: An Artificial Neural Network analysis on its resistances
Hew, J.-J., Leong, L.-Y., Tan, G. W.-H., Ooi, K.-B., & Lee, V.-H. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.10.007 · Cited by 283
Cheung, C., Lee, Z. W. Y., & Chan, T. K. H. (2015) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-09-2013-0192 · Cited by 270
Information technology adoption: a review of the literature and classification
Salahshour Rad, M., Nilashi, M., & Mohamed Dahlan, H. (2018) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-017-0534-z · Cited by 181
Sheng, N., Yang, C., Han, L., & Jou, M. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107500 · Cited by 162
Xie, L., & Lei, S. (2022) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103312 · Cited by 123
Metadata
- Authors
- Tan, X., Qin, L., Kim, Y., & Hsu, J.
- Venue
- Internet Research
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2012-03-30
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 211-233
- ISSN
- 1066-2243 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2094138884
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 30.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of privacy concern in social networking web sites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/10662241211214575
- The paper
- Tan, X., Qin, L., Kim, Y., & Hsu, J. (2012). Impact of privacy concern in social networking web sites. Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662241211214575
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.