The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Co‐creating unique value with customers
Abstract
The traditional system of company‐centric value creation (that has served us so well over the past 100 years) is becoming obsolete. Leaders now need a new frame of reference for value creation. In the emergent economy, competition will center on personalized co‐creation experiences, resulting in value that is truly unique to each individual. The authors see a new frontier in value creation emerging, replete with fresh opportunities. In this new frontier the role of the consumer has changed from isolated to connected, from unaware to informed, from passive to active. As a result, companies can no longer act autonomously, designing products, developing production processes, crafting marketing messages, and controlling sales channels with little or no interference from consumers. Armed with new tools and dissatisfied with available choices, consumers want to interact with firms and thereby co‐create value. The use of interaction as a basis for co‐creation is at the crux of our emerging reality. The co‐creation experience of the consumer becomes the very basis of value. The authors offer a DART model for managing co‐creation of value processes.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“More recently, cocreation is viewed as an appropriate customer-centric mechanism for health care organizations in which value is created with customers rather than for customers [7,8].”
From Improving the Theoretical Understanding Toward Patient-Driven Health Care Innovation Through Online Value Cocreation: Systematic Review (2020) · cites this paper as [7]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 1,003
Verma, R., Arya, V., Thomas, A., et al. (2023) · Journal of Intellectual Capital · doi:10.1108/jic-07-2022-0162 · Cited by 23
Value co‐creation and customer retention in services: Identifying a relevant moderator and mediator
Banik, S., & Rabbanee, F. K. (2023) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.2150 · Cited by 25
Bi-directional and stratified demeanour in value forming service encounter interactions
Echeverri, P., & Salomonson, N. (2017) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.01.007 · Cited by 25
“…and marketing conceptualizes value in terms of being interactively formed, meaning that value is realized during the interaction between a provider and a customer (Echeverri and Skålén, 2011; Grönroos, 2008, 2011; Grönroos and Gummerus, 2014; Prahalad and Ramaswamy, 2004; Schau et al., 2009).”
BackgroundRoy, R., & Cohen, S. K. (2015) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2015.01.004 · Cited by 23
SMEs and poverty alleviation in Nigeria: Marketing resources and capabilities implications
Asikhia, O. (2010) · New England journal of entrepreneurship · doi:10.1108/neje-13-02-2010-b005 · Cited by 23
“Barney (1991), Best (2005), and Prahalad and Ramaswamy (2004) further suggest two classifications of marketing resource: • Market-based resources: Those resources that can be immediately deployed in the marketplace to directly create or maintain competitive advantage.”
Offering a framework for value co-creation in virtual academic learning environments
Ranjbarfard, M., & Sureshjani, M. H. (2018) · Interactive Technology and Smart Education · doi:10.1108/itse-08-2017-0040 · Cited by 23
Disabled People’s Vulnerability in the European Single Market: The Case of Consumer Information
Eskytė, I. (2019) · Journal of Consumer Policy · doi:10.1007/s10603-019-09422-3 · Cited by 23
Bowen, G. L., Appiah, D., & Okafor, S. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12156057 · Cited by 23
Rajković, B., Đurić, I., Zarić, V., & Glauben, T. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13041884 · Cited by 29
“We believe that the explanation might be found in the effects not covered by the data collection: the consumers’ sense of transparency and value co-creation [95].”
BackgroundCompeting on social resources: the case of the Day Chocolate Company in the UK confectionery sector
Doherty, B., & Meehan, J. (2006) · Journal of Strategic Marketing · doi:10.1080/09652540600947847 · Cited by 23
“Downstream partnerships with customers to ‘co-create value’ are deemed desirable as the route to better product development and targeting (Leavy, 2004; Prahalad and Ramaswamy, 2004; Stabel and Fjeldstad, 1998).”
BackgroundJohns, R., & Davey, H. (2021) · Journal of Services Marketing · doi:10.1108/jsm-08-2021-542 · Cited by 25
McHugh, P., & Domegan, C. T. (2017) · Journal of Social Marketing · doi:10.1108/jsocm-10-2016-0063 · Cited by 22
Strategizing for the bottom of the pyramid: an action research into a Mexican agribusiness
Hernandez-Cazares, R., Lawson-Lartego, L., Mathiassen, L., et al. (2019) · Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing · doi:10.1108/jbim-01-2019-0042 · Cited by 22
User-Driven Innovation in Poland: Determinants and Recommendations
Szopik‐Depczyńska, K., Cheba, K., Bąk, I. D., & Ioppolo, G. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12010171 · Cited by 22
Robotic technologies and well-being for older adults living at home
Ge, G. L., & Schleimer, S. C. (2022) · Journal of Services Marketing · doi:10.1108/jsm-03-2022-0076 · Cited by 22
The role of value co-creation in building trust and reputation in the digital banking era
Vela, M. R., Frau, M., & Ferrer, A. (2024) · Cogent Business & Management · doi:10.1080/23311975.2024.2375405 · Cited by 35
“…companies actively listen to and act on customer feedback, they demonstrate commitment and responsiveness, enhancing trust and fostering loyalty (Prahalad & ramaswamy, 2004a). this continuous feedback loop not only improves the immediate value co-creation outcomes but also strengthens the…”
InfluentialReflections on student‐university interactions for next generation learning
Wong, D. H. (2012) · Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics · doi:10.1108/13555851211218084 · Cited by 22
“Keeping in mind that in this model value is created by the experiences of all actors involved in the interaction process (Prahalad, 2004; Prahalad and Ramaswamy, 2004), the question arises as to whether particular types of students are ‘good’ or ‘bad’ as co-producers in this process.”
BackgroundThe orchestrating firm: value creation in the video game industry
Gidhagen, M., Ridell, O. P., & Sörhammar, D. (2011) · Managing Service Quality · doi:10.1108/09604521111146261 · Cited by 24
Bigorra, A. M., & Isaksson, O. (2016) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2016.1238114 · Cited by 22
Co‐creating nonprofit brand equity
Juntunen, M., Juntunen, J., & Autere, V. (2012) · International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing · doi:10.1002/nvsm.1453 · Cited by 22
Who creates value in a user innovation community? A case study of MyStarbucksIdea.com
Lee, H., & Suh, Y. (2016) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/oir-04-2015-0132 · Cited by 23
“The success of Starbucks’ user innovation strategy supports the argument of Prahalad and Ramaswamy (2004) that customers can be a unique source of knowledge which is critical for the new product or service development and cannot be attained Online Information Review Vol. 40 No. 2, 2016 pp. 170-186…”
BackgroundBahyan, H., Ajmal, M. M., & Saber, H. (2024) · Benchmarking An International Journal · doi:10.1108/bij-10-2023-0699 · Cited by 27
Introducing structuration theory in communal consumption behavior research
Algesheimer, R., & Gurǎu, C. (2008) · Qualitative Market Research An International Journal · doi:10.1108/13522750810864468 · Cited by 21
Design Principles for Business-Model-based Management Methods—A Service-Dominant Logic Perspective
Blaschke, M., Haki, K., Riss, U. V., & Aier, S. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-59144-5_11 · Cited by 21
“While some studies introduce networks and partnerships in BM representation [40] or emphasize the importance of customers in BM design [6, 41], others lay emphasis on management tool to control the value distribution in joint value creation [40, 42].”
Pranita, D. (2018) · KnE Social Sciences · doi:10.18502/kss.v3i11.2763 · Cited by 21
“Prahalad & Ramaswamy (2004) proposed DART Model to enable value co creation, which consists of interactive dialogue mechanism in each value chain stage, access to company’s resources including the supply chains, customer’s opportunities to compare risks and benefits when consuming the products…”
BackgroundZafarullah, H., & Siddiquee, N. A. (2021) · Public Administration and Development · doi:10.1002/pad.1944 · Cited by 21
Yang, D., Chen, X., Ma, B., & Wei, H. (2021) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102841 · Cited by 21
A service-dominant logic of co-creation in higher education: emerging topics and conceptualizations
Cruz, M. D. F., Alves, H., & Rodrigues, R. G. (2022) · Journal of Marketing for HIGHER EDUCATION · doi:10.1080/08841241.2022.2134957 · Cited by 21
“…company perspective, presenting the DART model that allows understanding how companies can enhance the process of value co-creation with consumers (Prahalad & Ramaswamy, 2004a), advocating that dialogue, access, transparency and understanding of the risk-bene fi t are central aspects in creating…”
A multi-method bibliometric review of value co-creation research
Saxena, S., Amritesh, Mishra, S. C., & Mukerji, B. (2023) · Management Research Review · doi:10.1108/mrr-09-2022-0646 · Cited by 21
Moisander, J. K., Könkkölä, S., & Laine, P. (2012) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2012.01107.x · Cited by 22
Creating value in multiple cooperative relationships
Ippolito, A. (2009) · International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences · doi:10.1108/17566690911004195 · Cited by 20
“In order to define value creation, we must necessarily focus our attention on the process of co-creation, in other words on the active role played by the customer (Prahalad and Ramaswamy, 2004; Vargo and Lusch, 2004).”
BackgroundHonyenuga, B. Q., Tuninga, R. S. J., & GHIJSEN, P. W. T. (2014) · Journal of Transnational Management · doi:10.1080/15475778.2014.960786 · Cited by 21
“Globalization and ICT has led to intense competition generated by non-traditional competitors (Prahalad & Ramaswamy, 2004).”
BackgroundValue co-creation in health care
Rantala, K., & Karjaluoto, H. (2016) · International Academic Mindtrek Conference (Mindtrek) · doi:10.1145/2994310.2994325 · Cited by 23
Service Quality Experience and Customers’ Behavioural Intentions in Active Sport Tourism
Romiti, A., & Sarti, D. (2016) · Modern Economy · doi:10.4236/me.2016.712127 · Cited by 21
“In this kind of experience, the value is co-created with the customer [41].”
BackgroundValue Co-Creative Manufacturing with IoT-Based Smart Factory for Mass Customization
Kokuryo, D., Kaihara, T., Kuik, S. S., et al. (2017) · International Journal of Automation Technology · doi:10.20965/ijat.2017.p0509 · Cited by 21
The Role of Augmented Reality in the Interactivity of Co-Creation
Alimamy, S., Deans, K. R., & Gnoth, J. (2018) · International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction · doi:10.4018/ijthi.2018070106 · Cited by 21
How public sport centers can improve the sport consumer experience
Cepeda-Carrión, I., & Cepeda‐Carrión, G. (2018) · International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship · doi:10.1108/ijsms-02-2017-0008 · Cited by 23
From one-sized to over-individualized? Service logic’s value creation
Eriksson, E. M., & Nordgren, L. (2018) · Journal of Health Organization and Management · doi:10.1108/jhom-02-2018-0059 · Cited by 21
Współczesne trendy w innowacyjności : w kierunku otwartych innowacji
Kozarkiewicz, A. (2010) · Przegląd Organizacji · doi:10.33141/po.2010.05.05 · Cited by 21
Direct marketing channels in the French wine industry
Gurǎu, C., & Duquesnois, F. (2008) · International Journal of Wine Business Research · doi:10.1108/17511060810864606 · Cited by 21
Collaborative orientation to advance value co-creation in buyer–seller relationships
Gupta, S., Polonsky, M. J., & Lazaravic, V. (2017) · Journal of Strategic Marketing · doi:10.1080/0965254x.2017.1384747 · Cited by 21
“Willingness to share knowledge in value co-creation Scholars like Prahalad and Ramaswamy (2004, 2006) claim that buyers and sellers can no longer act independently in designing products or developing production processes.”
BackgroundZare, S., Bettiga, D., & Lamberti, L. (2019) · Journal of Strategic Marketing · doi:10.1080/0965254x.2018.1464051 · Cited by 20
“The involvement of consumers, as not merely passive audience but as co-inventors and co-developers with firms, is an emerging phenomenon in the market (Fernandes & Remelhe, 2016; Prahalad & Ramaswamy, 2004b) and firms need to know how to and which consumers involve in this conjoint process.”
BackgroundAnkrah, S. T., He, Z., Arku, J. K., & Asare-Kyire, L. (2024) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-01-2024-0076 · Cited by 21
Chung, K. C., & Tan, P. J. B. (2022) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440221079926 · Cited by 20
“In a subsequent study, Prahalad and Ramaswamy (2004) explored the concepts and factor analysis of value creation from the interactions between customers and enterprises, which led them to propose the DART (dialogue, access, risk assessment, and transparency) model, through which enterprises and…”
BackgroundInfluentialShamim, A., Ahn, J., Khan, I. M., et al. (2022) · The International Review of Retail Distribution and Consumer Research · doi:10.1080/09593969.2022.2109714 · Cited by 20
“In contrast to the goods-dominant phenomenon (Vargo and Lusch 2004), the service-dominant logic (SDL) emphasises on value-in-use, where customers and service providers deliberately and experientially co-create value (Prahalad and Ramaswamy 2004; Vargo and Lusch 2017).”
BackgroundPaulino, E. P. (2022) · Journal of Entrepreneurship Management and Innovation · doi:10.7341/20221823 · Cited by 27
Liang, X., Hu, X., Li, E. Y., & Meng, H. (2023) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-12-2021-0921 · Cited by 20
Reframing customer value from a dominant logics perspective
Schlager, T., & Maas, P. (2011) · der markt · doi:10.1007/s12642-011-0068-5 · Cited by 20
Syysnummi, P., & Laihonen, H. (2013) · International Journal of Educational Management · doi:10.1108/ijem-04-2013-0067 · Cited by 20
Enactments and the design of trail running equipment: An example of carrying systems
Rochat, N., Hauw, D., & Seifert, L. (2018) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2018.07.002 · Cited by 20
Ideation contests: Crowd management and valorization to avoid negative feelings of participants
Hanine, S., & Steils, N. (2019) · Creativity and Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/caim.12325 · Cited by 20
Social Capital and Value Co-Creation: The Case of a Polish Car Sharing Company
Tchorek, G., Brzozowski, M., Dziewanowska, K., Allen, A., Kozioł, W., Kurtyka, M., & Targowski, F. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12114713 · Cited by 31
“IT capacities will make the theories of co-creation pioneers Prahalad and Ramaswamy more relevant than they are now [9,65].”
BackgroundMethodValue creation in mobile social media: a systematic review and agenda for future research
Ju, X., Chocarro, R., & Martín, Ó. M. (2021) · Baltic Journal of Management · doi:10.1108/bjm-04-2021-0157 · Cited by 25
Corporate marketing management and corporate‐identity building
Tsai, S. (2008) · Marketing Intelligence & Planning · doi:10.1108/02634500810902866 · Cited by 20
Aspects of a cybernetic theory of tacit knowledge and innovation
Johannessen, J., & Olsen, B. (2011) · Kybernetes · doi:10.1108/03684921111117979 · Cited by 19
Learning the Models of Customer Behavior: From Television Advertising to Online Marketing
Bassano, C., Gaeta, M., Piciocchi, P., et al. (2017) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10864415.2016.1355654 · Cited by 20
“Clients, therefore, are becoming co-creators of value in the collaborative and sharing economy [35, 43].”
BackgroundCatalyzing innovation and knowledge sharing
Cullen, J. G. (2008) · Business Information Review · doi:10.1177/0266382108098059 · Cited by 20
“There has been a tangible acceleration in trying to clarify and understand what to make of social networking trends [1], customer co-creation of value [2] and wikinomics [3], which has not necessarily helped us arrive at a clear answer of what exactly this means for business librarians and information professionals.”
BackgroundLiebl, F. (2005) · Gabler Verlag eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-322-90786-8_7 · Cited by 20
How Consumers Shop in Virtual Reality? How It Works?
Lau, H.-F., Kan, C. W., & Lau, K.-W. (2013) · Advances in Economics and Business · doi:10.13189/aeb.2013.010104 · Cited by 19
“Numerous researches indicate that different consumers’ experiences are able to induce consumers’ shopping engagement [6-14].”
BackgroundPrasad, A., & Kumar, R. S. (2022) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.12844 · Cited by 19
Mohamad, A., Rizal, A. M., Kamarudin, S., et al. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su142316119 · Cited by 19
Facebook, self‐disclosure, and brand‐mediated intimacy: Identifying value creating behaviors
Hassan, M., Mydock, S., Pervan, S., & Kortt, M. A. (2016) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.1586 · Cited by 23
Innovation Instruments to Co-Create Needs-Based Solutions in a Living Lab
Haukipuro, L., Väinämö, S., & Hyrkäs, P. (2018) · Technology Innovation Management Review · doi:10.22215/timreview/1156 · Cited by 19
“Adopting the principles of the lead user method (von Hippel, 1986, 2005), the concept of co-creation was originally developed and popularized by Prahalad and Ramaswamy (2004).”
BackgroundMethodUsing Empathic Design as a Tool for Urban Sustainability in Low-Resource Settings
Sandman, H., Levänen, J., & Savela, N. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10072493 · Cited by 19
Unraveling Mechanisms of Value Cocreation in Festivals
Luonila, M., Suomi, K., & Lepistö, T. (2018) · Event Management · doi:10.3727/152599518x15378845225320 · Cited by 19
Complexity of Understanding Consumer Behavior from the Marketing Perspective
Arenas-Gaitán, J., Altamira, B. S., & Ramírez-Correa, P. (2019) · Complexity · doi:10.1155/2019/2837938 · Cited by 19
Actor engagement in online health communities
Stadtelmann, M., Woratschek, H., & Diederich, C. (2019) · International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing · doi:10.1108/ijphm-06-2018-0033 · Cited by 19
Listen to your customer - how to manage your restaurant more effectively
Nemeschansky, B. (2019) · Journal of Foodservice Business Research · doi:10.1080/15378020.2019.1671119 · Cited by 19
“In the restaurant industry, this knowledge is especially pertinent, as consumers’ influence is continually increasing as they interact with the business to co-create value (Prahalad & Ramaswamy, 2004a, 2004b).”
BackgroundNguyen, H. M., Onofrei, G., Harrison, N., & Truong, D. (2020) · Operations Management Research · doi:10.1007/s12063-020-00163-y · Cited by 19
“While there are costs associated with MF operations, at the same time, it creates value to cost reduction, enhance profitability and customer satisfaction (Prahalad and Ramaswamy 2004).”
BackgroundIdentifying multi-channel value co-creator groups in the banking industry
Hosseini, M., Shajari, S., & Akbarabadi, M. (2020) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102312 · Cited by 19
Transforming the news value chain in the social era: a community perspective
Serrano, M. J. H., Greenhill, A., & Graham, G. (2015) · Supply Chain Management An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-05-2014-0147 · Cited by 19
“The meaning of value shifts to the experiences, the market is shifting to a forum for conversation and interaction between consumers, consumer communities, and the firm (Prahalad and Ramaswamy, 2004).”
BackgroundEnvisioning E-HRM and strategic HR: Taking seriously identity, innovative practice, and service
Barrett, M., & Oborn, E. (2013) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2013.07.002 · Cited by 22
Castriotta, M., Floreddu, P. B., Guardo, M. C. D., & Cabiddu, F. (2013) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s1877-6361(2013)0000011008 · Cited by 19
The Potential of Student Co-Creation in Extracurricular Experiences
Celuch, K. G., Bačić, D., Chen, M. W., et al. (2018) · Marketing Education Review · doi:10.1080/10528008.2017.1419432 · Cited by 19
“Our findings and implications are consistent with the calls for organizational processes characterized by access, transparency, and dialogue in the service co-creation literature (Prahalad & Ramaswamy, 2004).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialGhatak, R. R. (2020) · Journal of Modelling in Management · doi:10.1108/jm2-07-2019-0168 · Cited by 19
Guerra, R. J. D. C., & Gonçalves, E. C. C. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16010321 · Cited by 18
“…of a product or service; (ii) “role” that the customer takes according to their “lifestyle”; (iii) level of use of “technological tools”; (iv) clarity of the “benefit” that the customer’s contribution to co-creation has; (v) “heterogeneity” of customers involved in the co-creation process [36].”
BackgroundKiba-Janiak, M., Cheba, K., Mucowska, M., de Oliveira, L. K., Piecyk, M. I., Evangelista, P., Prockl, G. G., & Rześny-Cieplińska, J. (2024) · Research in Transportation Business & Management · doi:10.1016/j.rtbm.2024.101194 · Cited by 19
Lopdrup-Hjorth, T. (2015) · Journal of Cultural Economy · doi:10.1080/17530350.2014.989883 · Cited by 18
“This transformation has been accompanied by the rise of new concepts such as ‘boundaryless organizations’ (Ashkenas et al. 2002), ‘partial organizations’ (Ahrne & Brunsson 2011), ‘permanently beta’ (Neff & Stark 2004), and ‘cocreation’ (Prahalad & Ramaswamy 2000, 2003, 2004a, 2004b).”
BackgroundTao, K., Ye, J., Xiao, H., & Chen, P. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.808114 · Cited by 19
“The most frequently quoted definition of value co-creation is proposed by Prahalad and Ramaswamy (2004), who view value co-creation as an aggregation of customers and as an exchange of service and product offerings.”
BackgroundThe Changing Landscape of Retail Banking and the Future of Digital Banking
Omarini, A. (2022) · Perspectives in law, business and innovation · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-7830-1_8 · Cited by 18
Erhardt, N., Martin‐Rios, C., Bolton, J. C., & Luth, M. T. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14052826 · Cited by 18
How to create more customer value in independent shops: A set-theoretic approach to value creation
Peng, P., Jacobs, S., & Cambré, B. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.066 · Cited by 18
Framing Changes of the Value Proposition of Emerging Technologies in a B2B Context
Nussipova, G. (2022) · Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing · doi:10.1080/1051712x.2022.2051833 · Cited by 21
Facets of Human-Centered Design: The Evolution of Designing by, with, and for People
Auernhammer, J. M. K., Zallio, M., Domingo, L., & LEIFER, L. J. (2022) · Understanding innovation · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-09297-8_12 · Cited by 24
How small family-owned businesses may compete with retail superstores
Dessì, C., Ng, W., Floris, M., & Cabras, S. (2014) · Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development · doi:10.1108/jsbed-02-2014-0025 · Cited by 18
“For example, Prahalad (2004) argued that today’s highly informed consumers are dissatisfied with available choices and “want to interact with firms and co-create value” (p.”
BackgroundInvestigating the unexplored possibilities of digital-physical toolkits in lay design
Hermans, G. (2014) · International journal of design · Cited by 18
The Impact of Cocreation on the Student Satisfaction: Analysis through Structural Equation Modeling
Díaz, O. P., Giner, G. R., & Perello-Marin, M. R. (2016) · Abstract and Applied Analysis · doi:10.1155/2016/3729791 · Cited by 18
“Communication between firms and clients (students) has an important influence in the cocreation process [33, 34] and constitutes one of the four building blocks (dialogue) identified by [35] in the DART model (dialogue, access, risk, and transparency).”
BackgroundAbendroth, L. J., & Pels, J. (2017) · Marketing Theory · doi:10.1177/1470593117702291 · Cited by 18
“While his theory is not entirely inconsistent with current marketing theory, it stops short of treating consumers as active players who jointly produce value with the firm (Humphreys and Grayson, 2008; Payne et al. 2008; Prahalad and Ramaswamy, 2004; Vargo and Lusch 2004).”
BackgroundMethodCustomer participation risk management: conceptual model and managerial assessment tool
Damali, U., Secchi, E., Tax, S. S., & McCutcheon, D. M. (2020) · Journal of service management · doi:10.1108/josm-05-2018-0147 · Cited by 20
Fostering Generative Partnerships in an Inclusive Business Model
Zhu, R., & Sun, S. L. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12083230 · Cited by 19
Communities of practice at the center of circular water solutions
Fulgenzi, A., Brouwer, S., Baker, K. C., & Frijns, J. (2020) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water · doi:10.1002/wat2.1450 · Cited by 23
“For instance, well-informed and active customers are increasingly recognized as a crucial external source of knowledge for innovation processes (Prahalad & Ramaswamy, 2004).”
BackgroundAn attention-based view on managing information processing channels in organizations
Holm, D. B., Drogendijk, R. H., & Haq, H. U. (2020) · Scandinavian Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2020.101106 · Cited by 22
“…to provide suggestions and have a realization that their voices will be heard, which depends on proper attention (both cognitively and through actual allocation of resources) being given to the customers by the top managers (see Khanagha, Volberda, & Oshri, 2017; Prahalad & Ramaswamy, 2004).”
BackgroundWu, C. H., & Mursid, A. (2019) · European Journal of Tourism Research · doi:10.54055/ejtr.v23i.395 · Cited by 19
“This finding contributes to the body of knowledge of customer participation in value co-creation stimulated by Vargo and Lusch (2004) and Prahalad and Ramaswamy (2004), especially in articulating three positive factors among the Big Five personality traits, namely extraversion, agreeableness and…”
BackgroundShen, X., Wang, L., Huang, X., & Yang, S. (2021) · Chinese Management Studies · doi:10.1108/cms-03-2020-0106 · Cited by 18
Hsieh, J. (2016) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.488 · Cited by 18
Mining social media for open innovation in transportation systems
Ulloa, D., Saleiro, P., Rossetti, R. J. F., & Silva, E. R. (2016) · IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) · doi:10.1109/itsc.2016.7795549 · Cited by 19
“Now, literature about innovation posits that this process lies in an altogether approach to value creation, based on an individual-centered co-creation of value between consumers and companies [1].”
BackgroundErtz, M. (2024) · Encyclopedia · doi:10.3390/encyclopedia4010012 · Cited by 18
Premises, practices and politics of co-creation for urban sustainability transitions
Frantzeskaki, N., Collier, M. J., Hölscher, K., Gaziulusoy, İ., Ossola, A., Albulescu, P., Bonneau, M., Borgström, S. T., Connop, S. P., Dumitru, A., et al. (2025) · Urban Transformations · doi:10.1186/s42854-025-00075-9 · Cited by 19
Promoting customer engagement in service settings through identification
Black, H. G., Jeseo, V., & Vincent, L. H. (2021) · Journal of Services Marketing · doi:10.1108/jsm-06-2020-0219 · Cited by 17
Enhancing brand experience in the online social media network context: a contingency perspective
Marmat, G. (2021) · Qualitative Market Research An International Journal · doi:10.1108/qmr-07-2020-0096 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Venue
- Strategy & Leadership
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 4-9
- ISSN
- 0094-064X (ISSN-L)
- 1087-8572
- OpenAlex
- W2046500054
- Cited by
- 2,463
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 131 · 2025: 166 · 2024: 167 · 2023: 149 · 2022: 165 · 2021: 160 · 2020: 130 · 2019: 167 · 2018: 159 · 2017: 144 · 2016: 153 · 2015: 138 · 2014: 148 · 2013: 139 · 2012: 92
- FWCI
- 38.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Strategy and Leadership (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Innovation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Keywords
- value co-creation, customer co-creation, consumer interaction, consumer empowerment, DART model, value creation, emerging economy, customer experience
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review