CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 802ERP Systems Implementation and ImpactCorporate Governance and ManagementEnterprise Management and Information Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 68 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Enterprise resource planning: An integrative review

Shehab, E.M., Sharp, M.W., Supramaniam, L., Spedding, T.A.·2004·Business Process Management Journal
DOI 10.1108/14637150410548056
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Enterprise resource planning (ERP) system solutions are currently in high demand by both manufacturing and service organisations because they provide a tightly integrated solution to an organisation's information system needs. During the last decade, ERP systems have received a significant amount of attention from researchers and practitioners from a variety of functional disciplines. In this paper, a comprehensive review of the research literature (1990‐2003) concerning ERP systems is presented. The literature is further classified and the major outcomes of each study are addressed and analysed. Following a comprehensive review of the literature, proposals for future research are formulated to identify topics where fruitful opportunities exist.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/14637150410548056

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Appleton, E.L. (1997), “How to survive ERP”,Datamation, pp. 50‐3.
  2. Sieber, T., Siau, K., Nah, F. and Sieber, M. (2000), “SAP implementation at the University of Nebraska: teaching case article”,Journal of Information Technology: Cases and Applications, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 41‐66.
  3. 10.1080/02683960010009079 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 802

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Shehab, E. M., Sharp, M. W., Supramaniam, L., & Spedding, T. A.
Affiliations
University of Greenwich (GB)
ORCID
Shehab, E.M.
Venue
Business Process Management Journal
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2004-08
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
359-386
ISSN
1463-7154 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1108/14637150410548056
OpenAlex
W1536465007
Cited by
801
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 78 · 2013: 78 · 2012: 69
FWCI
56.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.emeraldinsight.com/page/tdm (tdm)
Locations
Business Process Management Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Governance and Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Enterprise Management and Information Systems
Keywords
enterprise resource planning, integrated information systems, manufacturing organisations, service organizations, research agenda

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review