Cited by 122Health Policy Implementation ScienceSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesEvaluation and Performance Assessment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

After randomised trials: issues related to dissemination of evidence‐based interventions

Bumbarger, Brian, Perkins, Daniel·2008·Journal of Children's Services

Abstract

Demonstrating the efficacy and effectiveness of prevention programmes in rigorous randomised trials is only the beginning of a process that may lead to better public health outcomes. Although a growing number of programmes have been shown to be effective at reducing drug use and delinquency among young people under carefully controlled conditions, we are now faced with a new set of obstacles. First, these evidence‐based programmes are still under‐utilised compared to prevention strategies with no empirical support. Second, when effective programmes are used the evidence suggests they are not being implemented with quality and fidelity. Third, effective programmes are often initiated with short‐term grant funding, creating a challenge for sustainability beyond seed funding. We discuss each of these challenges, and present lessons learned from a large‐scale dissemination effort involving over 140 evidence‐based programme replications in one state in the US.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/17466660200800012

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Backer TE, 2001, Finding the Balance: Programme Fidelity in Substance Abuse Prevention: A State-of-the-Art Review
  2. Caporino N, 2003, Emotional and Behavioral Disorders in Youth, 63, 73
  3. Dusenbury L, 2003, Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education, 47, 4
  4. FL, Louis de la
  5. Greenberg MT, 2005, The Study of Implementation in School-based Preventive Interventions: Theory, Research, and Practice
  6. Marek LI, 2000, Blacksburg VA: Virginia Cooperative Extension. Retrieved
  7. National Institute on Drug Abuse, 2007, Development of Prevention Services Research at NIDA

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 122

Metadata

Authors
Bumbarger, B., & Perkins, D.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Children's Services
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2008-04-12
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
55-64
ISSN
1746-6660 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2118705140
Cited by
122
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
FWCI
12.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Children s Services (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Keywords
dissemination of evidence-based interventions, prevention programmes, implementation fidelity, implementation quality, seed funding, substance use prevention, juvenile delinquency prevention, youth, public health outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review