Cited by 374Health Policy Implementation SciencePublic Health Policies and EducationEvaluation and Performance Assessment

Making public health programs last: conceptualizing sustainability

Pluye, Pierre, Potvin, Louise, Denis, Jean-Louis·2004·Evaluation and Program Planning

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2004.01.001

Cites

108 of 108 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pluye, P., Potvin, L., & Denis, J.-L.
Affiliations
  • McGill University (CA)
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
Corresponding author
Pluye, Pierre
Venue
Evaluation and Program Planning
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-05
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
121-133
ISSN
0149-7189 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2017443876
Cited by
374
References
108
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 18
FWCI
20.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Evaluation and Program Planning (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Keywords
program sustainability, public health programs, organizational routines, institutional standards, social structure, program implementation, organizational theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review