Cited by 53Food Waste Reduction and SustainabilityAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactConsumer behavior in food and health

Using consumer surveys to determine food sustainability

Open access
Martindale, Wayne·2014·British Food Journal

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to define the sustainability attributes of frozen and fresh food consumption in a typical household. The reason for writing this paper is that food preservation is often overlooked when developing sustainability strategies. Design/methodology/approach – This study uses established carbon footprint data for specific food types and consumer survey data to determine how consumers use fresh and frozen products in the home. Consumption and waste data for 83 households was obtained using a combination of narrative and graphical association questions. Findings – The results show greenhouse gas emissions associated with a diets containing frozen food are reduced because 47 per cent less frozen foods is wasted as compared to fresh foods with a typical household wasting 10.4 per cent of fresh food and 5.9 per cent frozen food. Research limitations/implications – This research has highlighted the importance of understanding the waste impacts of catering and food service consumption outside the home. Practical implications – This research will guide future product development for frozen foods with regard to dietary planning and portion control. Social implications – The cost and sustainability benefits of meal planning are identified and these will inform policy making and education to improve dietary choices. Originality/value – This work extends the scope of current consumer surveys that assess quality, value and taste attributes to sustainability criteria and it will enable collaboration between fresh and frozen product categories to deliver sustainable dietary options.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/bfj-09-2013-0242

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martindale, W.
Affiliations
Sheffield Hallam University (GB)
Corresponding author
Martindale, Wayne
Venue
British Food Journal
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2014-07-01
Volume
116
Issue
7
Pages
1194-1204
ISSN
0007-070X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2015254967
Cited by
53
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
4.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Food Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Lincoln Repository (University of Lincoln) (acceptedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • SHURA (Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive) (Sheffield Hallam University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Consumer behavior in food and health
Keywords
food sustainability, frozen food, fresh food, household food consumption, food waste, greenhouse gas emissions, carbon footprint, food preservation, meal planning, portion control, consumer attitudes, sustainable diets

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review