Cited by 84Food Waste Reduction and SustainabilityNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact

Household food waste and eating behavior: empirical survey

Lanfranchi, Maurizio, Calabrò, Grazia, De Pascale, Angelina, Fazio, Alessandro, Giannetto, Carlo·2016·British Food Journal

Abstract

Purpose: In the food chain the identification of household food wastes represents the most problematic aspect to analyze: both as regards the assessment of its qualitative and quantitative aspects and for the detection of measures to reduce or control its generation. In 2012, in fact, the analyzed area showed an inequality index for disposable income of 6.3, and a relative poverty risk index of 42.3. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach: In order to get deeper insights into consumers’ wasting behaviors, a survey on food waste generation in households was carried out in a province of Sicily (Italy). The questionnaire has been formulated taking into account the socio-demographic characteristics for the person who, in the family, usually makes the expenditure, in particular: gender, age, marital status, number of household members, education level, type (single, with or without children, married with or without children), worker and/or student if responsible for food shopping, the number of monthly meals, the kind of ready meal eaten (frozen, fresh, canned or freeze-dried), net monthly income for the family, etc. (adapted by Bae et al., 2010). The data collected from the statistical return of the consumers were drawn up to transform the same data into information of simpler and more concise interpretation. Findings: The results of the survey are presented in this paper. They can help understand the reasons for discarding edible food and to identify the food groups that are most wasted. Research limitations/implications: The analysis of a larger land area or community allows most relevant conclusions. The research has an exploratory perspective since the sample strategy is not probabilistic. Social implications: The findings could be susceptible to support practical and social implications for the identification of measures and instruments aimed at reducing food waste and at increasing consumers’ awareness on that issue. Originality/value: The study can stimulate sustainable consumption and consumer behavior especially in light of the current economic crisis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/bfj-01-2016-0001

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Concerns about foodborne illnesses, together with a desire to eat fresh food, are prominent reasons for discarding food.

    “Indeed, concerns about foodborne illnesses, together with a desire to eat fresh food, are prominent reasons for discarding food (Lanfranchi et al., 2016;Neff et al., 2015;Qi and Roe, 2016).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lanfranchi, M., Calabrò, G., De Pascale, A., Fazio, A., & Giannetto, C.
Affiliations
University of Messina (IT)
Venue
British Food Journal
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2016-12-05
Volume
118
Issue
12
Pages
3059-3072
ISSN
0007-070X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2534775174
Cited by
84
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
5.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
British Food Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Keywords
household food waste, dietary habits, food waste generation, consumer behavior, food waste reduction, food consumption patterns, relative poverty, sustainable consumption, Sicily

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review