Cited by 43Quality and Supply ManagementHealthcare Quality and ManagementSustainable Supply Chain Management

Exploring integrated supply chain performance in healthcare: a service provider perspective

Srivastava, Shefali, Singh, Rohit Kr·2021·Benchmarking: An International Journal

Abstract

Purpose: The paper identifies the antecedents and consequences of integrated supply chain performance (ISCP) in healthcare systems. Design/methodology/approach: Based on a review of the literature constructs of supply chain flexibility (SCF), employee relationships (ERs), organizational orientation (OO) and knowledge exchange (KE) were identified as antecedents of ISCP, and patient centricity (PC) emerged as its consequence. This structural relationship was tested using partial least square structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Findings: ERs, SCF, OO and KE positively impacted the performance of an integrated healthcare supply chain. Furthermore, enhanced ISCP in operational processes of the hospital positively influenced patient centeredness and care quality. Research limitations/implications: Paper contributes by identifying antecedents and consequences of ISCP. Future researchers may explore the inter-relationships among the antecedents of ISCP. Practical implications: Insights from this study will help practitioners in enhancing hospital operations by integrating processes along the healthcare service supply chain and developing a patient-centric approach. Social implications: This paper highlights how PC may be achieved by focusing on a facilitative internal environment. This understanding may help in designing processes that deliver health as a social good in an effective manner. Originality/value: The empirical evidence from this study can help hospitals integrate their functions, thus, enabling them to deliver quality care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/bij-03-2020-0125

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Srivastava, S., & Singh, R. K.
Affiliations
Asia Pacific Institute of Management (IN)
Venue
Benchmarking: An International Journal
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2020-09-01
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
106-130
ISSN
1463-5771 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3082575431
Cited by
43
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3
FWCI
5.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Benchmarking An International Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Keywords
healthcare supply chain, supply chain flexibility, employee relationships, organizational orientation, knowledge sharing, patient-centricity, quality of care, hospital operations, service provider perspectives

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review