Cited by 68Patient Satisfaction in HealthcareService and Product InnovationCustomer Service Quality and Loyalty

The excellence of patient-centered healthcare: Investigating the links between empowerment, co-creation and satisfaction

Moretta Tartaglione, Andrea, Cavacece, Ylenia, Cassia, Fabio, Russo, Giuseppe·2018·The TQM Journal

Abstract

Purpose: Nowadays, international healthcare agendas are focused on patient centeredness. Policies are aimed at improving patient’s satisfaction by enhancing patient empowerment and value co-creation. However, a comprehensive model addressing the relationships between these constructs has not so far been developed. The purpose of this paper is to develop and test a model which explains the effects of patient empowerment and value co-creation on patients’ satisfaction with the quality of the services they experience. Design/methodology/approach: The links between patient satisfaction, empowerment and value co-creation are theoretically outlined via an in-depth literature review. The resulting model is tested through a survey administered to 186 chronically ill patients. The results are analyzed through covariance-based structural equation modeling. Findings: The results show that patient empowerment positively influences value co-creation which, in turn, is positively related to patient satisfaction. In addition, the analysis reveals that patient empowerment has no direct effects on satisfaction. Research limitations/implications: Although the cross-sectional design made it possible to clearly estimate the relationships among variables, it overlooked the longitudinal dimensions of co-creation processes. Practical implications: The study provides practitioners with suggestions to design patient-centered healthcare services by leveraging on patient knowledge, participation, responsibility in care and involvement in the value-creation process. Originality/value: Over the last decade, healthcare management literature has shifted its focus from healthcare organizations to patients. The number of contributions about patient satisfaction, empowerment and value co-creation exponentially increased. However, these dimensions are often studied separately. This work advances available knowledge by clarifying and testing the relationships between these three constructs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/tqm-11-2017-0138

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moretta Tartaglione, A., Cavacece, Y., Cassia, F., & Russo, G.
Affiliations
  • Università degli studi di Cassino e del Lazio Meridionale (IT)
  • University of Verona (IT)
Venue
The TQM Journal
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2018-03-05
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
153-167
ISSN
  • 0954-478X (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-2731
OpenAlex
W2784914332
Cited by
68
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14
FWCI
13.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The TQM Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi di Cassino (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
Keywords
patient-centered care, patient empowerment, value co-creation, patient satisfaction, quality of healthcare services, chronic disease patients, patient participation, health service design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review