The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
OPTIMIZING PERFORMANCE BY CONFLICT STIMULATION
Abstract
To enhance the quality of group decision making, to promote affective acceptance of decisions by all participants involved, or to increase joint outcomes, a principal party or a third party may stimulate social conflict. We argue that when conflict focuses on identity issues, when tension level is high, and when disputants' goals are negatively interdependent, conflict stimulation generally decreases joint performance. However, conflict stimulation enhances performance when conflict focuses on task issues, when tension level is low, and when disputants' goals are positively interdependent. We conclude by arguing that conflict may be stimulated either by creating or extending conflict issues, or by promoting contentious conflict behaviors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Effects of the expert, devil's advocate, and dialectical inquiry methods on prediction performance
Schwenk, C. R., & Cosier, R. A. (1980) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(80)90076-8 · Cited by 132
Research works printed but not linked: 41
- Bach G. R., 1969, The intimate enemy
- Bartunek J. M., 1992, D. M. Kolb & J, 209
- Brown, B. R. (1977). Face-saving and face-restoration in negotiation. In D. Druckman (Ed.),Negotiations: Social-psycliologicalperspectives (pp.275-299). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
- Brown L. D., 1983, Managing conflict at organizational interfaces
- Carnevale P. J., Cognition and affect in cooperation and conflict. Paper presented at the annual conference of the International Association for Conflict Management
- 10.1037/14788-000 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2391588 · DOI
- 10.1016/0030-5073(78)90018-1 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.4250030409 · DOI
- 10.1002/ejsp.2420230608 · DOI
- 10.1108/eb022708 · DOI
- 10.1177/001872674900200204 · DOI · Paper page
- Deutsch M., 1973, The resolution of conflict: Constructive and destructive processes, 10.1177/000276427301700206 · DOI · Paper page
- Fisher S., 1986, Stress and anxiety
- Folger J. P., 1984, Working through conflict: A communication perspective
- Glasl F., 1980, Konfliktmanagement: Diagnose und Behandlung von Konflikten in Organisationen [Conflict management: Diagnosis and treatment of conflicts in organizations]
- 10.1108/eb022688 · doi:10.1108/eb022688
- Johnson D. W., 1989, Cooperation and competition: Theory and research
- Kelley H.H., 1978, Interpersonal relations
- Kelly J., 1970, HarvardBusiness Review, 48, 103
- 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb00564.x · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb00564.x
- Levi L., 1981, Preventing work stress
- Minuchin S., 1974, Families andfamily therapy: A structural approach, 10.4159/9780674041127 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60308-1 · DOI · Paper page
- Pritchard D., 1992, M. D. Dunnette & L, 3, 443
- Rahim M. A., 1992, Managing conflict in organizations
- Robbins S. P., 1974, Managing organizational conflict: A nontraditional approach
- Robbins S. P., 1991, Organizational behavior: Concepts, controversies, and applications
- Rubin J. Z., 1994, Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement
- 10.1016/0749-5978(90)90051-A · DOI · Paper page
- Sheppatd B. H., 1984, B. M. Staw & L, 141
- Sherif M., 1966, common predicament
- 10.1002/job.4030130307 · DOI · Paper page
- Thomas K. W., 1992, M. D. Dun? nette & L, 651
- Tjosvold D., 1991, The conflict-positive organization: Stimulate diversity and create unity
- 10.1177/002188638502100103 · doi:10.1177/002188638502100103
- Van de Vliert E., 1994, Agreeableness and activeness as components of conflict behavior.JournalofPersonality and Social Psychology, 66, 614-6&1
- Van de Vliert E., Journal of Applied Psychology.
- 10.1177/001872678904200901 · DOI
- Walton R. E., 1969, Interpersonalpeacemaking: Confrontations and third party consultation
- 10.1002/cne.920180503 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis.
De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.741 · Cited by 3,071
Self-citationGETTING IT TOGETHER: TEMPORAL COORDINATION AND CONFLICT MANAGEMENT IN GLOBAL VIRTUAL TEAMS.
Montoya-Weiss, M. M., Massey, A. P., & Song, M. (2001) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/3069399 · Cited by 832
TOWARD A THEORY OF MANAGING ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICT
Afzalur Rahim, M. (2002) · International Journal of Conflict Management · doi:10.1108/eb022874 · Cited by 953
Ensley, M. D., Pearson, A. W., & Amason, A. C. (2002) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/s0883-9026(00)00065-3 · Cited by 565
How task and person conflict shape the role of positive interdependence in management teams
Janssen, O. (1999) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/s0149-2063(99)80006-3 · Cited by 377
Metadata
- Authors
- van de Vliert, E., & de Dreu, C. K. W.
- Venue
- International Journal of Conflict Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 1994-03-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 211-222
- ISSN
- 1044-4068 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1979396662
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: OPTIMIZING PERFORMANCE BY CONFLICT STIMULATION. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/eb022743
- The paper
- van de Vliert, E., & de Dreu, C. K. W. (1994). OPTIMIZING PERFORMANCE BY CONFLICT STIMULATION. International Journal of Conflict Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022743
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
