Cited by 31Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorWork-Family Balance ChallengesWorkplace Health and Well-being

How do young employees perceive stress and job engagement while working from home? Evidence from a telecom operator during COVID-19

Olsen, Karen Modesta, Hildrum, Jarle, Kummen, Kamilla, Leirdal, Caroline·2023·Employee Relations: The International Journal

Abstract

Purpose: The study examines the extent to which job demands and resources are related to job stress and engagement among young employees exposed to remote work. The study draws on the job demands–resources (JD-R) model, adapted to working from home during the pandemic. Design/methodology/approach: The study uses data from a survey among young employees (35 years and younger) in a large, telecommunications company in Norway (N = 303), conducted in May 2021. Linear regression analysis was employed. Findings: The results show that the difficulty of work tasks is positively related to stress while time spent working from home, managing work–life balance and receiving support from leaders are negatively related to stress. Furthermore, overtime, support from leaders and colleagues and managing work–life balance are positively related to job engagement. Having a dedicated workspace at home is not related to either job stress or engagement and no gender differences exist. Originality/value: The study theoretically contributes to the literature by showing that the nature of work plays out differently for the well-being of employees working from home. In terms of practical implications, the study suggests that adjusting the level of difficulty of work tasks and providing support can alleviate stress among young employees. Providing the option to work from home may reduce stress among these young employees, however working from home may face limitations regarding enhancing job engagement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/er-05-2022-0230

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Olsen, K. M., Hildrum, J., Kummen, K., & Leirdal, C.
Affiliations
  • Norwegian School of Economics (NO)
  • Telenor (Norway) (NO)
Venue
Employee Relations: The International Journal
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2023-02-10
Volume
45
Issue
3
Pages
762-775
ISSN
0142-5455 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4319780874
Cited by
31
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8
FWCI
9.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Employee Relations (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
Keywords
working from home, remote work, occupational stress, work engagement, young workers, job demands-resources model, work-life balance, leader support, coworker support, overtime, task difficulty, gender differences, COVID-19 pandemic, telecommunications industry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review