Cited by 139Work-Family Balance ChallengesJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorStress and Burnout Research

The role of leisure crafting for emotional exhaustion in telework during the COVID-19 pandemic

Open access
Abdel Hadi, Sascha, Bakker, Arnold B., Häusser, Jan A.·2021·Anxiety, Stress, & Coping

Abstract

BACKGROUND: After the worldwide outbreak of COVID-19 in 2020, many employees transitioned from in-office work to telework to slow down the spread of the virus. Building on the Job Demands-Resources model, we examined day-level relationships between job demands, home demands and emotional exhaustion during telework. Moreover, we tested if leisure crafting (i.e., the proactive pursuit and enactment of leisure activities targeted at goal setting, socializing, growth and development) is negatively related to emotional exhaustion. We expected that proactive personality would be positively related to leisure crafting. Finally, emotional exhaustion was predicted to relate negatively to job performance. METHODS: We tested our assumptions using a daily diary study on seven consecutive days with 178 employees (964 observations in total). RESULTS: Multilevel path analysis supports the assumptions that daily job demands as well as daily home demands during telework are positively related to emotional exhaustion. As predicted, we found leisure crafting to be negatively related to emotional exhaustion, and proactive personality to be positively related to leisure crafting. Finally, emotional exhaustion was negatively related to job performance. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our study supports a health-promoting role of leisure crafting above the unfavorable relationships between job demands and home demands with emotional exhaustion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10615806.2021.1903447

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2017). Mplus User's Guide. Sixth Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
  2. Semmer, N., Zapf, D., & Dunckel, H. (1999). Instrument zur Stress-bezogenen Tätigkeitsanalyse [Instrument for stress-oriented job analysis] (ISTA). In H. Dunckel (Ed.), Handbuch psychologischer Arbeitsanalyseverfahren [Handbook of instruments for psychological work analysis] (pp. 179-204). Vdf Hochschulverlag an der ETH.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abdel Hadi, S., Bakker, A. B., & Häusser, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Department of Psychology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
  • Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE)
Venue
Anxiety, Stress, & Coping
Published
2021-03-26
Volume
34
Issue
5
Pages
530-544
ISSN
  • 1061-5806 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-2205
OpenAlex
W3137092628
Cited by
139
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 11
FWCI
36.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Anxiety Stress & Coping (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • German Research Foundation (HA6455/3-1, HA6455/3-2)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
Keywords
leisure crafting, emotional exhaustion, remote work, COVID-19 pandemic, job demands, home demands, proactive personality, employee performance, job demands-resources model, employee well-being
MeSH terms
Work Performance, Work-Life Balance, Rumination, Cognitive, Teleworking, COVID-19, Adult, Burnout, Professional, Female, Germany, Humans, Leisure Activities, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Workload

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review