The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Investigating an innovative service with hospitality robots
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to identify the factors that influence the development of service robots, and to apply a service innovation strategic mindset to the hotel industry in Taiwan. Design/methodology/approach: A mixed-methods approach, combining an expert panel and semi-structured interviews using a SMART SWOT ranking survey, was applied to understand the perspectives of hotel owners and robotics experts. Findings: Fifty-three items were collected regarding the demand side of the hospitality market, showing that the Taiwan hospitality industry has good potential to implement service robots. Sixty-one items on the supply side of business were collected, showing that this robotics service can help hotels handle seasonal employment and labor utilization. The SWOT analysis identifies “The fun and curiosity aroused in consumers can enhance the promotion of service robots”, “Lack of talent in system integration”, “Taiwan’s aging society can increase the demand for service robots” and “China and South-east countries have aggressively poached talent in the global robotics market” as key issues. Originality/value: Few studies have investigated robotics service for hotels using the six-dimensional service innovation model. This model helps identify six factors and implies that this new service concept can position hotels to better compete by using IT and relationship marketing strategies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036 · Cited by 14,779
Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6 · Cited by 7,824
Managing the co-creation of value
Payne, A. F., Storbacka, K., & Frow, P. (2008) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-007-0070-0 · Cited by 3,502
People respond better to robots than computer tablets delivering healthcare instructions
Mann, J. A., MacDonald, B. A., Kuo, I.-H., Li, X., & Broadbent, E. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.029 · Cited by 156
Cited by
Adoption of AI-based chatbots for hospitality and tourism
Pillai, R., & Sivathanu, B. (2020) · International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management · doi:10.1108/ijchm-04-2020-0259 · Cited by 986
Impact of artificial intelligence on employees working in industry 4.0 led organizations
Malik, N., Tripathi, S. N., Kar, A. K., & Gupta, S. (2022) · International Journal of Manpower · doi:10.1108/ijm-03-2021-0173 · Cited by 416
Chi, O. H., Denton, G., & Gursoy, D. (2020) · Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management · doi:10.1080/19368623.2020.1721394 · Cited by 334
Hotel managers’ perceptions towards the use of robots: A mixed-methods approach
Ivanov, S., Seyitoğlu, F., & Markova, M. (2020) · Information Technology & Tourism · doi:10.1007/s40558-020-00187-x · Cited by 243
Ivanov, S., & Webster, C. (2019) · Robots, Artificial Intelligence, and Service Automation in Travel, Tourism and Hospitality · doi:10.1108/978-1-78756-687-320191002 · Cited by 102
When Robot (Vs. Human) Employees Say “Sorry” Following Service Failure
Wang, X., Hwang, Y., & Guchait, P. (2023) · International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Administration · doi:10.1080/15256480.2021.2017812 · Cited by 60
Spektor, F., Fox, S. E., Awumey, E., Begleiter, B., Kulkarni, C., Stringam, B., Riordan, C. A., Rho, H. J., Akridge, H., & Forlizzi, J. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3579466 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuo, C.-M., Chen, L.-C., & Tseng, C.-Y.
- Venue
- International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2017-05-08
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1305-1321
- ISSN
- 0959-6119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2602156528
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 13.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.