Cited by 515Customer Service Quality and LoyaltyConsumer Market Behavior and PricingCustomer churn and segmentation

A cross-cultural study of switching barriers and propensity to stay with service providers

Patterson, Paul G., Smith, Tasman·2003·Journal of Retailing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-4359(03)00009-5

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Patterson, P. G., & Smith, T.
Affiliations
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • Thammasat University (TH)
Corresponding author
Patterson, Paul G.
Venue
Journal of Retailing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-01
Volume
79
Issue
2
Pages
107-120
ISSN
0022-4359 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980355260
Cited by
515
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 35
FWCI
14.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Retailing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Customer churn and segmentation
Keywords
switching barriers, switching costs, customer retention, service loyalty, cross-cultural comparison, search costs, functional risk, social bonds, customer satisfaction, retail services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review