Cited by 218Technology Adoption and User BehaviourKnowledge Management and SharingHealth, Technology, Consumer Behavior

Predicting mobile social network acceptance based on mobile value and social influence

Lin, Kuan-Yu, Lu, Hsi-Peng·2015·Internet Research

Abstract

Purpose – Building upon studies of value theory and social psychology literature, the purpose of this paper is to empirically test a research model that incorporates antecedents of value (mobile convenience, service compatibility, security risk, and cognitive effort) and mobile value (utilitarian and hedonic value), and social influence (social norms and number of peers) to examine factors affecting user intention toward mobile social networking sites (SNSs). Design/methodology/approach – The proposed model was empirically evaluated using survey data collected from 318 users on their perceptions of mobile SNSs. A structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to assess the relationships of the research model. Findings – The results revealed that mobile convenience, service compatibility, security risk, and cognitive effort have a significant and indirect impact on the user acceptance of mobile SNSs through their respective paths on hedonic value and utility value. Practical implications – Mobile SNSs practitioners should focus on enhancing users’ mobile value through perceived benefits, lower perceived costs, and simultaneously developing social influence to further boost users’ intention to use for mobile social networking services. Originality/value – This study contributes to a theoretical understanding of factors that explain users’ intention to use the mobile SNSs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/intr-01-2014-0018

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, K.-Y., & Lu, H.-P.
Affiliations
  • Ling Tung University (TW)
  • National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (TW)
Venue
Internet Research
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2015-02-02
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
107-130
ISSN
1066-2243 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2090453507
Cited by
218
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 2
FWCI
45.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Internet Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Knowledge Management and Sharing
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
Keywords
technology acceptance, social influence, utilitarian value, hedonic value, service compatibility, security risks, cognitive effort, social norms, peer influence, intention to use, axiology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review