Predicting mobile social network acceptance based on mobile value and social influence
Abstract
Purpose – Building upon studies of value theory and social psychology literature, the purpose of this paper is to empirically test a research model that incorporates antecedents of value (mobile convenience, service compatibility, security risk, and cognitive effort) and mobile value (utilitarian and hedonic value), and social influence (social norms and number of peers) to examine factors affecting user intention toward mobile social networking sites (SNSs). Design/methodology/approach – The proposed model was empirically evaluated using survey data collected from 318 users on their perceptions of mobile SNSs. A structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to assess the relationships of the research model. Findings – The results revealed that mobile convenience, service compatibility, security risk, and cognitive effort have a significant and indirect impact on the user acceptance of mobile SNSs through their respective paths on hedonic value and utility value. Practical implications – Mobile SNSs practitioners should focus on enhancing users’ mobile value through perceived benefits, lower perceived costs, and simultaneously developing social influence to further boost users’ intention to use for mobile social networking services. Originality/value – This study contributes to a theoretical understanding of factors that explain users’ intention to use the mobile SNSs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Security risk has been found a salient inhibitor to various online services.
“Security risk has been found a salient inhibitor to various online services”
From Why people participate in the sharing economy: an empirical investigation of Uber (2018) · cites this paper as Lin and Lu, 2015
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194 · see citing works
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483 · see citing works
Building Effective Online Marketplaces with Institution-Based Trust
Pavlou, P. A., & Gefen, D. (2004) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1040.0015 · Cited by 2,516 · see citing works
Value-based Adoption of Mobile Internet: An empirical investigation
Kim, H.-W., Chan, H. C., & Gupta, S. (2007) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2005.05.009 · Cited by 2,084 · see citing works
Using Social Network Sites: The Effects of Playfulness, Critical Mass and Trust in a Hedonic Context
Sledgianowski, D., & Kulviwat, S. (2009) · Journal of Computer Information Systems · doi:10.1080/08874417.2009.11645342 · Cited by 568 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The influence of perceived value on purchase intention in social commerce context
Gan, C., & Wang, W. (2017) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-06-2016-0164 · Cited by 442 · see citing works
Why people participate in the sharing economy: an empirical investigation of Uber
Lee, Z. W. Y., Chan, T. K. H., Balaji, M. S., & Chong, A. Y.-L. (2018) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-01-2017-0037 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
Gupta, K., & Arora, N. (2019) · South Asian Journal of Business Studies · doi:10.1108/sajbs-03-2019-0037 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Wu, Y., & Huang, H. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15054432 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
The effects of using social network sites on academic performance: the case of Qatar
Al-Yafi, K., El-Masri, M., & Tsai, R. (2018) · Journal of Enterprise Information Management · doi:10.1108/jeim-08-2017-0118 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Shopping in the digital world: How augmented reality mobile applications trigger customer engagement
Lin, K.-Y., & Huang, T. K. (2024) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102540 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Self-citationInvestigating the impact of mobile SNS addiction on individual’s self-rated health
Xue, Y., Dong, Y., Luo, M., Mo, D., Dong, W., Zhang, Z., & Liang, H. (2018) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-05-2017-0198 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Mohd Suki, N., & Mohd Suki, N. (2020) · Journal of Marketing Communications · doi:10.1080/13527266.2019.1569088 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lin, K.-Y., & Lu, H.-P.
- Affiliations
- Ling Tung University (TW)
- National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (TW)
- ORCID
- Lin, Kuan-Yu
- Venue
- Internet Research
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2015-02-02
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 107-130
- ISSN
- 1066-2243 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2090453507
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 45.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Internet Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Communication › Knowledge Management and Sharing
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
- Keywords
- technology acceptance, social influence, utilitarian value, hedonic value, service compatibility, security risks, cognitive effort, social norms, peer influence, intention to use, axiology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review