CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 306AI in Service InteractionsCustomer Service Quality and LoyaltyTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 127 of the 128 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Can AI chatbots help retain customers? Impact of AI service quality on customer loyalty

Chen, Qian, Lu, Yaobin, Gong, Yeming, Xiong, Jie·2023·Internet Research
DOI 10.1108/intr-09-2021-0686
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigates whether and how the service quality of artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots affects customer loyalty to an organization. Design/methodology/approach: Based on the sequential chain model of service quality loyalty, this study first classifies AI chatbot service quality into nine attributes and then develops a research model to explore the internal mechanism of how AI chatbot service quality affects customer loyalty. The analysis of survey data from 459 respondents provided insights into the interrelationships among AI chatbot service quality attributes, perceived value, cognitive and affective trust, satisfaction and customer loyalty. Findings: The results show that AI chatbot service quality positively affects customer loyalty through perceived value, cognitive trust, affective trust and satisfaction. Originality/value: This study captures the attributes of the service quality of AI chatbots and reveals the significant influence of service quality on customer loyalty. This study develops research on service quality in the information system (IS) field and extends the sequential chain model of quality loyalty to the context of AI services. The findings not only help an organization find a way to improve customers' perceived value, trust, satisfaction and loyalty but also provide guidance in the development, adoption, and post-adoption stages of AI chatbots.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/intr-09-2021-0686

Cites

127 of 127 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 128 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. 2002, An integrative approach to the assessment of e-commerce quality, Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 3, 114
  2. 2020, Exploring oppositional loyalty and satisfaction in firm-hosted communities in China: effects of social capital and e-quality, Internet Research, 30, 487
  3. 1994, Qualitative Data Analysis
  4. 1997, Satisfaction: A Behavioural Perspective on the Consumer
  5. 2015, SmartPLS 3
  6. 2000, Should we delight the customer?, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28, 6
  7. 2001, Developing a scale to measure the perceived quality of an internet shopping site (SITEQUAL), Quarterly Journal of Electronic Commerce, 2, 31

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 306

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Chen, Q., Lu, Y., Gong, Y., & Xiong, J.
Affiliations
  • Huazhong Agricultural University (CN)
  • Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
  • École de management de Lyon (FR)
  • ESSCA School of Management (FR)
ORCID
Venue
Internet Research
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2023-01-17
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
2205-2243
ISSN
1066-2243 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1108/intr-09-2021-0686
OpenAlex
W4316468117
Semantic Scholar
94eded573134ce189a6362aed40b62d3f26b60b8
Cited by
260
References
128
Citations by year
2026: 60 · 2025: 109 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 21
FWCI
24.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)
Locations
Internet Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › AI in Service Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Keywords
AI chatbots, service quality, customer loyalty, perceived value, cognitive trust, affective trust, customer satisfaction, AI services, customer retention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review