Cited by 71School Leadership and Teacher PerformanceJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorEducational Leadership and Practices

Emotional reframing as a mediator of the relationships between transformational school leadership and teachers’ motivation and commitment

Berkovich, Izhak, Eyal, Ori·2017·Journal of Educational Administration

Abstract

Purpose: Empirical evidence links transformational school leadership to teachers’ autonomous motivation and affective organizational commitment. Little empirical research, however, has focused on the emotional mechanisms behind these relations. Following the argument in the literature that transformational leadership can transform followers’ emotions, the purpose of this paper is to examine whether teacher’s experience of emotional reframing by principal mediates the relationships between transformational school leadership and these work-related outcomes (i.e. teachers’ motivation and commitment). Design/methodology/approach: Questionnaires were used to collect information from 639 primary school teachers nested in 69 randomly sampled schools. The data were analyzed using multilevel path analysis software. Findings: The results indicated that the effect of transformational school leadership behaviors on teachers’ autonomous motivation was fully mediated by emotional reframing, and that the effect of transformational school leadership on affective organizational commitment was partially mediated by it. The authors further found an indirect relationship of transformational school leadership with affective organizational commitment through emotional reframing and autonomous motivation. Originality/value: The present study makes a unique contribution to the literature by confirming that teachers’ sense of emotional reframing is a key affective mechanism by which school leaders influence teachers’ motivation and commitment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/jea-07-2016-0072

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Transformational leadership has a positive effect on teachers' motivation and commitment.

    “Empirical studies in education indicate the positive effect of transformational leadership on teachers' motivation and commitment (Berkovich & Eyal, 2017;Eyal & Roth, 2011).”
  • There is a strong and positive relationship between transformational leadership and affective organisational commitment.

    “Various studies confirmed a strong and positive relationship between transformational leadership and affective organisational commitment (Berkovich & Eyal, 2017;Bogler & Berkovich, 2022;Berkovich & Bogler, 2021;Dou, Devos, & Valcke, 2017;Sayadi, 2016).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berkovich, I., & Eyal, O.
Affiliations
  • Open University of Israel (IL)
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Venue
Journal of Educational Administration
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2017-08-07
Volume
55
Issue
5
Pages
450-468
ISSN
0957-8234 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2693890940
Cited by
71
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
17.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Educational Administration (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Leadership and Teacher Performance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Leadership and Practices
Keywords
affective commitment, mediation, primary school teachers, principal-teacher relations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review