Emotional reframing as a mediator of the relationships between transformational school leadership and teachers’ motivation and commitment
Abstract
Purpose: Empirical evidence links transformational school leadership to teachers’ autonomous motivation and affective organizational commitment. Little empirical research, however, has focused on the emotional mechanisms behind these relations. Following the argument in the literature that transformational leadership can transform followers’ emotions, the purpose of this paper is to examine whether teacher’s experience of emotional reframing by principal mediates the relationships between transformational school leadership and these work-related outcomes (i.e. teachers’ motivation and commitment). Design/methodology/approach: Questionnaires were used to collect information from 639 primary school teachers nested in 69 randomly sampled schools. The data were analyzed using multilevel path analysis software. Findings: The results indicated that the effect of transformational school leadership behaviors on teachers’ autonomous motivation was fully mediated by emotional reframing, and that the effect of transformational school leadership on affective organizational commitment was partially mediated by it. The authors further found an indirect relationship of transformational school leadership with affective organizational commitment through emotional reframing and autonomous motivation. Originality/value: The present study makes a unique contribution to the literature by confirming that teachers’ sense of emotional reframing is a key affective mechanism by which school leaders influence teachers’ motivation and commitment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Transformational leadership has a positive effect on teachers' motivation and commitment.
“Empirical studies in education indicate the positive effect of transformational leadership on teachers' motivation and commitment (Berkovich & Eyal, 2017;Eyal & Roth, 2011).”
From Principals' digital transformational leadership, teachers' commitment, and school effectiveness (2025) · cites this paper as Berkovich & Eyal, 2017
There is a strong and positive relationship between transformational leadership and affective organisational commitment.
“Various studies confirmed a strong and positive relationship between transformational leadership and affective organisational commitment (Berkovich & Eyal, 2017;Bogler & Berkovich, 2022;Berkovich & Bogler, 2021;Dou, Devos, & Valcke, 2017;Sayadi, 2016).”
From Principals' digital transformational leadership, teachers' commitment, and school effectiveness (2025) · cites this paper as Berkovich & Eyal, 2017
Cites
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68 · Cited by 27,815 · see citing works
Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348 · Cited by 11,929 · cited 2× · see citing works
“For example, personality traits such as neuroticism and extraversion, have been found to be linked with a tendency toward self-reappraisal (Gross and John, 2003) and to be associated with individuals' willingness to open up and seek help (Nir, 2009; Tatar, 2009).”
BackgroundMethodLack of method variance in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: reality or artifact?
Williams, L. J., Cote, J. A., & Buckley, M. R. (1989) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.74.3.462 · Cited by 1,616 · see citing works
Leadership, affect and emotions: A state of the science review
Gooty, J., Connelly, S., Griffith, J., & Gupta, A. (2010) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.005 · Cited by 471 · see citing works
Leroy, H., Anseel, F., Gardner, W. L., & Sels, L. (2015) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206312457822 · Cited by 447 · see citing works
POPPER, M. (2004) · Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour · doi:10.1111/j.0021-8308.2004.00238.x · Cited by 76 · see citing works
How emotional is transformational leadership really?: Some suggestions for a necessary extension
Küpers, W., & Weibler, J. (2006) · Leadership & Organization Development Journal · doi:10.1108/01437730610677972 · Cited by 72 · cited 1× · see citing works
“According to Kupers and Weibler (2006), transformational behaviors cause followers to reinterpret negative emotions in a more positive way, mainly by challenging them intellectually and offering a different outlook on the situation, and by providing them personal support and encouragement.”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Principals' digital transformational leadership, teachers' commitment, and school effectiveness
Berkovich, I., & Hassan, T. (2025) · Education Inquiry · doi:10.1080/20004508.2023.2173705 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Berkovich, I., & Eyal, O.
- Affiliations
- Open University of Israel (IL)
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
- Venue
- Journal of Educational Administration
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2017-08-07
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 450-468
- ISSN
- 0957-8234 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2693890940
- Cited by
- 71
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 17.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Educational Administration (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › School Leadership and Teacher Performance
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Leadership and Practices
- Keywords
- affective commitment, mediation, primary school teachers, principal-teacher relations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review